Fedora :: Which Version Is Most Stable For Production Use
Apr 23, 2010I am going to install Fedora server for production use so, i want to know which Fedora version is most stable for production use.
View 12 RepliesI am going to install Fedora server for production use so, i want to know which Fedora version is most stable for production use.
View 12 RepliesI am using fedora 6 and i want to upgrade but i am not sure which version of fedora is more stable for production use.
View 3 Replies View RelatedWhich is the current stable version of kernel in fedora 10 and how can I installed because right now I have unstable kernel:
uname -a
Linux blind 2.6.29.3-60.fc10.x86_64 #1 SMP Sat May 9 04:18:14 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
I just want to get back to latest stable kernel of fedora 10. I'm not able from the grub to choose an older because there are only kernels for fedora 9. The problem was that previously I used fedora 9 however I upgrade it but it was still with kernel of fedora 9 so I pick it the unstable of fedora 10 and I installed it. Right now I just want to get back to current version of kernel in fedora 10 so I can upgrade it to fedora 11.
Is it possible to use ubuntu 10.04 lts desktop version as a web host for a production site?. If it is possible, can anyone give me links on how to do it?
View 5 Replies View RelatedWhy does update manager doesn't tell me that ubuntu 10.10 is out? I'm running 10.04.1 LTS. I have to do alt-F2 "update-manager -d" in order to see the 10.10 message even if ubuntu is config to notice me of normal releases.And then just before the update begins, the official readme says that 10.10 is (at the moment) a RELEASE CANDIDATE version. Just an old not-updated readme?Why does Ubuntu official home page annunces 10.10 as a stable version?
View 9 Replies View RelatedI want to install Debian Stable 8 Jessie. I've tried the main website, of course, first. But there are a lot of options there to download Debian 8: CD, DVD, Live etc. I downloaded debian-live-8.0.0-amd64-lxde-desktop.iso and I booted live in VirtualBox. It boots fine and the operating system looks in order.
Questions/problems:
1. The desktop icon for the installer says "Install Debian sid". But from what I know "sid" is unstable version. I do not want unstable, nor testing. I just want normal Stable. Did I got the wrong version? The website is a bit confusing about which version is which.
2. How do I check the md5 of the iso? I know how to do that with other distros, they usually specify it near the download link and I can execute in terminal the command 'md5sum' followed by the specific linux distro iso and then compare the numbers. But I can find no such thing for Debian. I searched the website but could not find any clear info.
3. After I install, what should I do in order to make Iceweasel work with Flash and multimedia codecs? I also need Skype and the proprietary Nvidia drivers.
And if I enable these non free, do I get automatic updates for them like for the rest of standard Debian software? Or, if not, what should I do?
The idea is that I want a system that is as stable and bug free as possible, but I won't use many apps beyond these ones. I don't need the latest and greatest software as long as these get security updates. Should I be ok with this configuration?
Is there a way to get the newest version of firefox on debian stable? Also I downloaded google chrome and installed it but it won't show up in my menu or under installed programs in the software center.
View 2 Replies View Relatedkernel with which most version number may be compiled in Debian 5 stable without updating to testing? 2.6.32.8 can't compile, if not turn off virtualization, since Documentation/least/least.c
contains
#include <sys/eventfd.h>
which is present in libc6-dev from testing, but is absent in stable.To drivers compiling kernel used own linux/eventfd.h.
I should update my Opensuse 11.0 to the last stable version?I need to know exactly how to do: should I download an iso image?Should I operate from Yast?
View 9 Replies View RelatedDoes a stable version of Chromium exist and is there a repository for it?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI'm using Ubuntu 9.10 and I'm trying to install DirectFB 1.4.3. I can do it with no problems by downloading the sources from the directfb website and installing it by hand. but I can't replace the 1.2 stable version that is in the apt-get tree. Is it possible to do it?
View 1 Replies View RelatedAny news on the stable version of skype? I cant find one anywhere.
View 5 Replies View RelatedIf I download the Ubuntu Beta, will it become the stable version from normal updating when the stable version comes out, or will I need to download and install the stable version when it comes out?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI recently bought a Dell 10v netbook and put Debian lenny on it. I got everything up and running, except that sound doesn't work. Two links I found said that the solution was to download alsa-drivers, alsa-lib, and alsa-util from the ALSA website and ./configure && make && make install:
[URL]
Another source says this can be fixed on Etch by recompiling alsa from source:
[URL]
However, I'm running stable lenny, and I'd rather do things the "right" way instead of doing a regular make install. Is there a way to grab the binary packages from testing/unstable and install those without problems? If that's not possible, can I grab the source package from testing/unstable and use that? If that's not possible, can I download the source from ALSA's website and build a package myself?
gnome.org that hosts gtk-doc seams to be down. Does anyone know where i can download the latest stable version of gtk-doc?
View 1 Replies View RelatedIt seems that the edition of GnomeSlackBuild for Slackware 13.37 has not been published yet ?Does the current run stable ? or the old version ?
View 7 Replies View RelatedI use openSUSE 11.4 64 bits with KDE. For a specific reason (incompatibility with our internal revenue website) I'll have to downgrade to the latest stable FireFox version, 3.6 or something. I however do not know how to :
1. find this repository
2. when found, install it over my current 4.0.1 version.
Ever since i found out that there was something called cinepaint i've tried to install it. On their website it says that the debian version currently isn't stable, and therefore not released. I've tried their own CVS file, and costum files. Nothing so far works.
View 9 Replies View RelatedCan someone tell me which is the latest stable kernel version available in the repositories?? Is it 2..6.35-22 ??? if so, when will 2.6.36 be available??
View 4 Replies View RelatedI want to upgrade my current evolution (2.30.3) with the latest stable release (2.32.2). How can I do it? Is there any PPA for that?
I am using Maverick.
I am running CentOS release 5.3 (Final)
kernel: CentOS (2.6.18-53.1.13.el5)
After updating to the version: CentOS (2.6.18-164.el5), the server is not stable and i have got a lot of this kind error:
Sep 19 02:08:36 server kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sda8): ext3_lookup: unlinked inode 3372068 in dir #5148223
Sep 19 02:08:36 server kernel: Aborting journal on device sda8.
Sep 19 02:08:36 server kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sda8): ext3_lookup: unlinked inode 3372071 in dir #5148223[code].....
I just ran "yum update" to download the latest kernel from the repository, and noticed that it's 2.6.18-164.11.1 while the latest on www.kernel.org is 2.6.32.4.Out of curiosity, why is there such a discripency between the two? Lack of resources to test and build binaries?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI am using OpenSUSE 11.4 64 bit with GNOME. I also use the Tumbleweed and Packman for Tumbleweed repositories. Accoording to uname -r, my current kernel version is 2.6.37.1-1.2-desktop.
How do I safely update to the latest stable kernel version?
I am new to OpenSUSE. Please provide step by step directions.
I have 3.6.2pre installed through PPA and everyday the updates are exactly the same files and same size totalling 18.6 mb I am assuming something is wrong and would like to get the 3.6 stable version installed without loosing my bookmarks and passwords...it shows Other Updates (LP-PPA-ubuntu-mozilla-daily)
View 3 Replies View Relatedevolution crash or shuts down by itself .version 2.28 and 2.30 has the same problem.
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1473440&page=4
i was thinking maybe and older version will be better.
I have recently upgraded to Firefox 3.6.2pre, I would like to downgrade to a stable version Firefox 3.5.?
View 9 Replies View RelatedGNOME commander (latest stable version) does not show mounted volumes at panel. OS: openSUSE 11.4 GNOME 64bit
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am using Fedora 11I have sound working for flash videos, audio files, and simple recording applications like Audacity and in general.I get tons of fatal error popups on the screen as well.Rather annoying but does anyone know what the source to the problem is?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI'm using Apache as a web server and mod_ssl to handle my certs. Everything was working fine on Fedora 11 running 0.9.8x of openssl until I updated to 12. Version 1.0.0beta4 of open ssl is full of bugs. It is basically incompatible with .net and php's implementation of SSL. Running wireshark actually shows it fails at handshake stages...
I'm not here to report the bugs relating to openssl but can somebody please explain why there is an unstable version of openssl in Fedora 12 as standard?
well I switched from windows several years ago and never looked back. I wanted to use fedora (and I did for a while) but ended up using ubuntu studio (actually ubuntu with selected studio components) and to be fair it has worked out well. the thing is I am looking to keep my server skills up to date and I know at this time redhat is king and fedora has most of the stuff I need to keep current (files in same places, yum/rmp vs apt-get) for that elusive linux job I am looking for. but I need a real time kernel, jack, ardour, hydrogen and other assorted open source packages because, well because that is my interest. so...
1) Are these packages available in fedora via yum (I don't want to maintain tar packages)
2) Is there a real time kernel as well from yum?
3) kvm/qemu virtual machines did not work with the rt kernel on ubuntu 9.04 but DID in fact work on ubuntu 9.10. Has anyone used the rt kernel and run kvm/qemu on fedora? cause if I cant have a few vm's (opensolaris, centos and xp to be exact) I cannot come back.
ubuntu is nice but after a year I still keep starting to type yum install vs apt-get so I guess fedora never really left me... oh I should mention my computer is 64 bit...