Debian Configuration :: Nmap Never Updates Scriptdb

Aug 25, 2015

nmap does not update the scripts when launching Code: Select allnmap --script-updatedb from ANY debian i EVER tried.

I cannot find a workaround, just old bug reports that this is fixed.

Why, is this not ever working on debian. I expected an update-nmap-db command to be Debian conform but there is no such thing.

Running Wheezy with latest updates.

View 0 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Debian Configuration :: Different Nmap Results And Configure A MTA?

Jan 26, 2010

I have been trying to configure an MTA (sendmail) on a new Debian installation to receive system messages and local network mail. I have no need to fetch or relay mail outside my teeny LAN. The logs on the sending machine told me the mails were refused by the receiving (Debian Lenny) system. So I ran some quick nmap scans. From the sending machine, scanning the Debian machine:

PORT STATE SERVICE
22/tcp open ssh
111/tcp open rpcbind

From the Debian machine, running 'nmap localhost':

PORT STATE SERVICE
22/tcp open ssh
25/tcp open smtp
111/tcp open rpcbind
587/tcp open submission

From the Debian machine, running 'nmap debian' (this is a virtual machine named debian) :

PORT STATE SERVICE
22/tcp open ssh
111/tcp open rpcbind

Why the two different results? How do I get the scans to be the same so I can, eventually, configure an MTA?

View 3 Replies View Related

Debian Configuration :: Save To Install Kernel 2.6.35.2 On Debian Lenny 5.0.5 Or Stick With Automatic Updates

Aug 20, 2010

is it save to install linux kernel 2.6.35.2 on Debian Lenny 5.0.5 or stick with automatic updates...

View 14 Replies View Related

Debian Configuration :: Xorg Drops Out After Squeeze Updates

May 27, 2010

From aptitude log

[UPGRADE] acpi 1.5-1 -> 1.5-2
[UPGRADE] acpid 1:2.0.4-1 -> 1:2.0.5-1
[UPGRADE] cron 3.0pl1-110 -> 3.0pl1-111
[UPGRADE] initscripts 2.87dsf-10 -> 2.88dsf-5
[UPGRADE] libavcodec52 5:0.5.1+svn20100427-0.0 -> 5:0.5.1+svn20100512-0.1
[UPGRADE] libavformat52 5:0.5.1+svn20100427-0.0 -> 5:0.5.1+svn20100512-0.1
[UPGRADE] libavutil50 5:0.5.1+svn20100427-0.0 -> 5:0.5.1+svn20100512-0.1
[UPGRADE] libcue1 1.3.0-1 -> 1.4.0-1
[UPGRADE] libpostproc51 5:0.5.1+svn20100427-0.0 -> 5:0.5.1+svn20100512-0.1
[UPGRADE] libswscale0 5:0.5.1+svn20100427-0.0 -> 5:0.5.1+svn20100512-0.1
[UPGRADE] sysv-rc 2.87dsf-10 -> 2.88dsf-5
[UPGRADE] sysvinit 2.87dsf-10 -> 2.88dsf-5
[UPGRADE] sysvinit-utils 2.87dsf-10 -> 2.88dsf-5
[UPGRADE] xserver-xorg-video-vesa 1:2.3.0-2 -> 1:2.3.0-3

I start my box from startx but after getting these updates, x tries to start, I see a mouse and a screen for a second and then it drops out again. I'm running the latest nvidia drivers from nvidia and have tried reinstalling them and they install fine, but no go.

Only thing I can find in xorg.log is:
(II) Power Button: Close
(II) UnloadModule: "evdev"
(II) Power Button: Close
(II) UnloadModule: "evdev"
(II) Logitech Logitech BT Mini-Receiver: Close
(II) UnloadModule: "evdev"
(II) Logitech Logitech BT Mini-Receiver: Close
(II) UnloadModule: "evdev"
(II) MLK wireless combo set: Close
(II) UnloadModule: "evdev"
(II) MLK wireless combo set: Close
(II) UnloadModule: "evdev"
(II) IR-receiver inside an USB DVB receiver: Close
(II) UnloadModule: "evdev"
(II) IR-receiver inside an USB DVB receiver: Close
(II) UnloadModule: "evdev"
(II) Macintosh mouse button emulation: Close
(II) UnloadModule: "evdev"

My xorg.conf file is void of anything related to input devices and has been working a treat. So it would seem one of these updates has screwed evdev. I've tried reverting back to earlier versions, but I get the same issues. I was running squeeze with kernel 2.6.32-4-amd64 when all this happened. It was running like a trooper. I've now tried 2.6.32-5-amd64 but still no go.

View 3 Replies View Related

Debian Configuration :: Updates Available But Aptitude Upgrade Ignores Them

Nov 21, 2010

After running "aptitude upgrade" I have been getting a message lately such as "There are x updates available, it is recommended to update your system". But, running aptitude update/upgrade again afterwards, aptitude ignores these supposedly available updates to the system. How can I clear up this situation?. I am using the latest Debian Squeeze distro

View 5 Replies View Related

Debian Configuration :: Updates Broke X Get A Blank Screen Instead Of The Login?

May 15, 2010

and this morning's updates broke x. I get a blank screen instead of the login. I'm running an Nvidia 7900GS. I tried re-installing the Nvidia drivers... no good. I switched to the nv drivers and got further; I got the login screen, but when I try to log in it gives me the KDE splash screen and then takes me back to the login screen. I'm not sure what to try next.

View 13 Replies View Related

Debian Configuration :: Stuck In Aptitude Limbo - Errors During Updates

Sep 1, 2011

It's trying to fix/complete failed installs but keeps encountering the same errors (error message below). I'm running basically Testing, but there are a few Stable and SID packages due to issues with the blasted nVidia legacy drivers. I've swapped out the video board with an ATI board so that is sorted, but now I can't do any updates. Hoping there is some way to manually override apt's determination to try to fix all broken packages whenever I do anything (install, remove, update, etc). A Google search of this error message didn't turn up anything recent. Any thoughts are welcome.

[Code].....

View 2 Replies View Related

Debian Configuration :: Wine And Squeeze Kernel - Future Updates To The Packages

Dec 21, 2010

Are the 1.3 Wine packages availible at [url] compatible with the Squeeze kernel? What about future updates to the packages there?

View 3 Replies View Related

Debian Configuration :: Latest Updates To "Grub Pc" Crashed System?

Dec 19, 2010

Debian squeeze (weekly build) with latest kernel "2.6.32-5-686"

installed the latest updates, but latest updates to "Grub pc" crashed my system... it stops before login-screen. Unfortunately i can see any error messages, the screen stays black...

i have to re-install i guess...

View 2 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Updates Installation - RPM Fusion Repository Configuration

Aug 17, 2010

I just installed RPMFusion free and non-free, and now update manager is telling me that it needs to install updates "RPM Fusion (free) Repository Configuration" and "RPM Fusion (non-free) Repository Configuration". When I try to install these I get a message asking 'Do you trust the source of the packages?" and i click 'Yes", it then asks for a password for authentication, and then I get message saying "Could not update packages. Failed to process request" and under more details:

failed to install signature: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/PackageKit/helpers/yum/yumBackend.py", line 2926, in install_signature
self.yumbase.getKeyForPackage(pkg, askcb = lambda x, y, z: True)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/__init__.py", line 4309, in getKeyForPackage
result = ts.pgpImportPubkey(misc.procgpgkey(info['raw_key']))
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/rpmUtils/transaction.py", line 59, in __getattr__
return self.getMethod(attr)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/rpmUtils/transaction.py", line 69, in getMethod
return getattr(self.ts, method)
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'pgpImportPubkey'

View 3 Replies View Related

Server :: Yum-updates Configuration - Option Doesn't Work At All

Dec 5, 2010

I can see that in yum-updatesd configuration i can use smtp_server to rely mail notifications as per below outputs from man pages smtp_server SMTP server to use when sending mail, host or a hostort string. Defaults to localhost:25. The problem that this option doesn't work at all and it rely into the local MTA not the one set on the smtp_server

View 2 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Security Updates Clobber Configuration Information?

Jan 13, 2010

Why can't Ubuntu store configuration information in a way that it wouldn't need to be clobbered in order to apply security updates? For example, this mornings updates told me I had to choose between using a new version of smb.conf that's part of the security patches, stick with the old version, or let the update installer merge them. Of course, the first two choices have obvious drawbacks: why should I have to choose between losing all my SMB settings or refusing security fixes? So I chose the merge, which came back with "Conflicts found during three-way merge! edit `/etc/samba/smb.conf' and sort them out manually."

View 5 Replies View Related

OpenSUSE :: How To Install Nmap?

Feb 20, 2011

So I tried to install it using the install/remove software and then run it out of the start menu but nothing happens. Bear with me I am new to linux,

View 9 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Security :: HOW TO Installing NMap 5.20 In X64

Jan 22, 2010

If you have been trying to compile & install the new NMAP 5.20 scanning utility as a 64 bit user, you may have run into some issues as I did...The compiler will halt when you attempt to 'make', saying that you need to recompile using -fPIC.The fix: "./configure CXXFLAGS=-fPIC CFLAGS=-fPIC LPFLAGS=-fPIC"then rerun "make".I hope this helps someone, as it took me way longer than it should have to get this going. Enjoy the new versions as it is supposed to have 10,000 updated OS detection signatures and new scripts!

View 2 Replies View Related

Networking :: Using NMAP On A Range Of IP Addresses

Dec 21, 2010

Hopefully Ody has found a result in the 5 years since he posted this question, for anyone else looking for an answer
NMAP scan for a range of individual IP's can be done using the '-' for example:
(this is accurate as of 2010, actual results have been altered to match OP's address range)


$nmap -sP 192.168.0.1-14

Starting Nmap 5.00 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2010-12-22 09:55
Interesting ports on 192.168.0.1:
Not shown: 999 closed ports
PORT STATE SERVICE
80/tcp open http


Interesting ports on 192.168.0.2
Not shown: 999 closed ports
PORT STATE SERVICE
80/tcp open http


Interesting ports on 192.168.0.3:
Not shown: 999 closed ports
PORT STATE SERVICE
80/tcp open http

Nmap done: 14 IP addresses (3 hosts up) scanned in 8.08 seconds

View 1 Replies View Related

General :: How To Upgrade Nmap On Backtrack

Mar 29, 2011

i have old version for nmap:root@bt:~# nmap --version nmap version 5.35DC1 ( http://nmap.org ) i download new version, but before i install it, is there a way to upgrade the old one on my system? or need to un-install the old version and install the new version? i tried this:

root@bt:~# yum upgrade nmap
Setting up Upgrade Process
Could not find update match for nmap
No Packages marked for Update
root@bt:~#

View 8 Replies View Related

General :: Using Awk To Clean Up Nmap Output?

Jan 13, 2011

Wondering how to use awk to take nmap's output "Discovered open port 23/tcp on 192.168.0.4" and create a output of "192.168.0.4:23"?

View 9 Replies View Related

Security :: Detect Nmap With Iptables?

Apr 27, 2011

i have a problem with iptables when i use nmap to scan ports then ports shown.this is my rules on my firewall.Quote:

*filter
:INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [1002:40080]
:RH-Firewall-1-INPUT - [0:0]
-A INPUT -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT

[Code]...

View 3 Replies View Related

Networking :: Can Nmap Detect Port-sharing

Sep 28, 2010

Since I no longer have access to a spare machine to actually test this out on, I was hoping some kind soul might know the answer, or be willing to try it out for me. I'm trying to find out if the port scanner nmap can detect two different services which are sharing a single port. For instance, if I'd managed to set up, I dunno, a web server and an ftp server to both run over the same port, would nmap with version detection be able to detect both of them, or just one?

View 7 Replies View Related

Networking :: Nmap Showing Wrong Information?

Oct 16, 2010

I'm not too sure if this is the right topic to post in but if it isn't please move it to the correct topic. I recently opened some ports for my Playstation 3 and the connection test on the PS3 tells me that the ports are open . But when I execute this command

nmap -p 0-60000 192.168.1.5 I get this

Quote:

Starting Nmap 5.21 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2010-10-16 20:54 AUS Eastern Daylight
Time Nmap scan report for PS3 (192.168.1.5)
Host is up (0.00063s latency).
All 60001 scanned ports on PS3 (192.168.1.5) are closed
MAC Address: **:**:**:**:**:** (Sony Computer Entertainment)

Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 4.12 seconds

I could be executing the wrong command or something but I have read through the manual and couldn't find anything that helped. I have tried this command on other machines that I have opened ports for and get similar results except for a few Ephemeral ports (80,443 etc.) which also makes me wonder why these aren't listed as open on the PS3?

View 2 Replies View Related

General :: Nmap (No Ports Showing Open)

Apr 16, 2011

I scanned my home machine (windows vista) with Nmap, after disabling the firewall and all ports came back with the status as unknown (No Open Ports). Why no ports are showing as open?

View 3 Replies View Related

General :: Scanning A LAN For Specifc Ports With Nmap?

Jul 16, 2011

I want to identify all the computers on my LAN that have port 80 open. So I want to scan an IP range (192.168.0-255.0-255) and have Nmap print onto the screen all the IPaddresses it scanned that are accepting connections on port 80. How do I do this?

View 1 Replies View Related

Security :: Show Banners On Nmap For Apache2?

May 5, 2011

when I nmap -sV domain I can see my chrooted apache2 banner how can I do not even show the banner even if is chrooted.

View 1 Replies View Related

Software :: NMap - OSScan Results May Be Unreliable

Jul 9, 2011

I'm currently doing some experiments with nmap in a Backtrack 5 VM environment. I am currently at a cafeteria and I'm connected to the (open :S) network at the shop with my Windows machine. In the BT VM I'm trying to scanning my Windows machine (with another network adapter) but I'm getting unexpected results:

nmap -A Aggressive -sS -O 10.236.xxx.xxx
Starting Nmap 5.51 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2011-07-09 12:11 CDT
Nmap scan report for Aggressive (67.215.xxx.xxx)
Host is up (0.17s latency).
rDNS record for 67.215.xxx.xxx: hit-nxdomain.opendns.com
Not shown: 999 filtered ports
PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION
80/tcp open http lighttpd 1.4.19
|_http-methods: No Allow or Public header in OPTIONS response (status code 302)
Warning: OSScan results may be unreliable because we could not find at least 1 open and 1 closed port
Device type: general purpose
Running: Linux 2.6.X
OS details: Linux 2.6.9, Linux 2.6.9 - 2.6.30
Network Distance: 1 hop
TRACEROUTE (using port 80/tcp)
HOP RTT ADDRESS
1 14.97 ms hit-nxdomain.opendns.com (67.215.xxx.xxx)

10.236.xxx.xxx is my Windows machine but another machine in the network (67.215.xxx.xxx) is currently replying to my nmap scanning.

View 1 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Networking :: Nmap Ping A Pc With Icmp Disabled?

Nov 13, 2010

I tried to ping some of the pcs on the local network but for those with icmp disabled it doesn't work. I've used

Code:
nmap -sP 192.168.2.0/24

View 3 Replies View Related

Security :: Nmap Retuns Many Non Existing Local Ip -- Hacked?

Nov 18, 2010

A scan on my computer reported as up many local ips which simply does not exist in my network. This host is supposed to have ip 192.168.0.4, but all other ip should not be there. I have a USB modem connected to a Linux box, connected itselfs to a wifi linksys router and thats it.

# nmap -sP '192.168.*.*' | grep -v down
Starting nmap 3.81 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2010-11-18 21:46 CET
Host 192.168.0.4 appears to be up.
Host 192.168.7.27 appears to be up.
Host 192.168.10.0 appears to be up.

[Code]...

View 3 Replies View Related

Programming :: Display Only IP Or IP And Hostname Output Of Nmap Scan?

Mar 28, 2011

I am running a scan via nmap (nmap -sP) and the out put looks similar to this:

Nmap scan report for x.y.z.com (10.x.x.x)
Nmap scan report for 10.x.x.x

If it can resolve the hostname it does, if not it just spits out the IP. I would like to know the best syntax to use with cut, or awk, so that the only output is either the IP or IP - HOSTNAME.

View 3 Replies View Related

Slackware :: Nmap - Install Required Lib - Http And Shortport

Oct 7, 2010

I want to use this: [url]

However, I got an error because it required "http" and "shortport" lib for NSE.

I don't know how to install them. All I got is nmap shipped by slackware.

View 1 Replies View Related

Debian Configuration :: ProFTPd Configuration - Use To Host MySQL Databases And A Few Websites

Nov 18, 2010

I am having no luck configuring ProFTPd on a Debian Lenny production server we use to host our MySQL databases and a few websites. I had originally set it up so I could login and manage our internal sites, but I have the need to allow a few clients in to access their sites that we host. I am trying to root the users in their site directory, which would be "/sites/www.whatever.com/".

It just hit me while typing this. Is it possible to create a user without a shell to prevent login via SSH and set the home folder to /sites/whatever instead of /home/username? That would allow me to continue operating with my current configuration and root them in their site while preventing SSH logins.

View 6 Replies View Related

Debian Configuration :: Multipath Configuration On 5.0 64 Bit - Doesn't Create The Relative Devices

Jul 20, 2011

i have a HP MSA 2312fc SAN with 2 LUNs configured. The first LUN (LUN ID 1) is correctly connected to the system, but when i connect the second LUN (LUN ID 30), i find in the syslog this message: multipathd: 8:64: size 6835937472, expected 5267578112. Discard

Here is the multipath.conf

[Code]....

So I correctly see the two luns, but multipath doesn't create the relative devices. Under /dev/mapper I see: control mpath0 mpath0-part1 mpath0-part1 is the first lun, the one I mounted in a directory under filesystem. I can't find the device for the second lun

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved