using the LDAP as storage of hostnames/IPs/MACs for the DHCP server on CentOS.Also once the IP is allocated via DHCP to the hosts,it would be useful to insert such host into the DNS. (BIND? dnsmasq?)I've found this link [URL] which deals with a patch for the ISC DHCP package, but I don't think this is actually up-to-date.
View 1 RepliesI've tried to followed exactly the steps in:
[URL]
on how to setup Samba PDC w/ LDAP backend. I've reach far up to page two of the tutorial. However I'm stucked in the middle of the part of page two:
[URL]
in the part of the Start the LDAP Samba installation up and I should type the :
#useradd user1
#smbldap-useradd -a -G 'Domain Users' -m -s /bin/bash -d /home/user2 -F "" -P user1
I get this error:
Error looking for next uid in sambaDomainName=sambaDomain,dc=DOMAINNAME:No such object at /usr/lob/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/smbldap_tools.pm line 1194.why does this appear, Is there any configurations missing?
I installed CentOS 5.2 and then run yum update. I configured this server as LDAP/Samba primary domain controller. LDAP seems to be OK and for testing I am able to create users with:smbldap-tools useradd -am usernameI can ssh into the server as root and also as a Linux user which was locally created in the server. But ssh into the server as LDAP user fails (from a Fedora 11 machine) with "Permission denied, please try again", prompting again for password.Some data:
# rpm -qa | grep ldap
python-ldap-2.2.0-2.1
php-ldap-5.1.6-23.2.el5_3
[code]....
Following situation:
I'm trying to make a network-installation of my rootserver with CentOS 5.4 x86_64.
This server is hosted by 1and1 a company of the united internet group, which is a big player in europe.
The network environment of 1and1 is providing classless static routes via dhcp by using the dhcp option 121.
If i'm right anaconda does not support this dhcp option 121 and therefore does not "ask" for the routes.
Without the routes configured the traffic does not get through and the network installation fails.
An installation from fedora12 (anaconda 12.46) works without any problems.
Is there someone in the dev team that can patch or backport it?
I have been battling with FreeRadius with LDAP backend and Microsofts built-in supplicant. I found on some directions that the certificate you use have to have a EKU(Enhanced Key Usage) with an ODI of 1.3.6.1.5.5.7.3.1 and a Client side Cert with the same except a ODI of 1.3.6.1.5.5.7.3.2. First off, is this still the case in Windows 7/xp?If it is, how do I add that to a certificate with OpenSSL, FYI I am using the ca.cnf/server.cnf under the /etc/raddb/certs directory.Another question, has anyone got the MS Supplicant to work with Freeradius and a LDAP backend? If so can you point me in the direction of some good walk through?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am having a problem getting a wireless network connection on my DELL laptop running CentOS 5. I have no problem getting a wireless connection when the laptop is booted in Windows XP. I also don't have a problem when booted under CentOS 5 and there is no authentication setup on the wireless router. I only have a problem when I setup authentication. The router wireless log shows the PC connectinng, authenticating, and succeeding authentication.I am using the Broadcom Hybrid-wl wireless driver.
View 19 Replies View RelatedI want to install GTK+. I see there are also numerous dependencies, which i've been slowly tackling, and the Cairo package has been particularly difficult. It claims the following upon ./configure --prefix=/usr configure: WARNING: Could not find libpng in the pkg-config search path checking whether cairo's PNG backend could be enabled... no configure: error: requested PNG backend could not be enabled I've done some searching and found that libpng.pc is in my /usr/lib/pkgconfig/ directory and that the following commands don't do the trick:
PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/usr/lib/pkgconfig
export PKG_CONFIG_PATH
How to install open ldap on CentOS 5
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm setting up a LDAP server to centralize the admin of a bunch of Centos 5.2 servers. I've got the LDAP server set up. I've got my client machines reading their autofs mount tables from LDAP. Now, I'd like to get name resolution working via LDAP.
Here's what I have so far:
1) /etc/nsswitch.conf contains the line "hosts: files dns ldap"
2) /etc/openldap/ldap.conf has URI and NSS_BASE_HOSTS set up to indicate root of "hosts" subtree in LDAP database.
3) "hosts" node in database is an "orginizationalUnit" object.
4) Below "hosts" I have a number of "ipHost" nodes defined with "cn" set to host name and "ipHostNumber" set to host's IP address
This setup doesn't work. Attempting to ping a host by name locks up. If I take the "ldap" keyword off of the "hosts:" entry in the nsswitch.conf file, the ping then returns immediately with "unknown host".
I'm surprised that there isn't better information available online on how to do this. I've found bits and pieces, but nothing concise. how to get name resolution working through LDAP?
I have LDAP server but I'm not admin. When I type: ldapsearch -x -b "ou=2007,o=faculty" "cn=7username"
View 11 Replies View RelatedI have a running PDC with Samba and LDAP. But when I want to join the Domain with an XP Pro Client I just get following error message.
"A Device connected to the System is not working".
I have an existing home network with fixed ip's. I'd like to connect a "dish network" HDTV box into the network but it can't use fixed ip's. So is it possible to use one of my computers and setup a DHCP subnetwork?
View 19 Replies View Relatedhow to configure DHCP server on centos linux and how to configure FTP server on centos linux
View 2 Replies View RelatedAssume I installed originally CentOS Desktop with IP receiving from DHCP server.Later I decided to assign a fixed IP to the local CentOS installation.How do I switch (permanently) the dynamic DHCP IP assignment to a fixed IP?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have installed Centos 5 on a virtual machine (esx4i). I set it to obtain an IP address from the DHCP sever, which is a broadband router, it has been given an IP address of 10.10.11.159 the router is 10.10.11.1 but I can't ping the router and I can't get any access to the network! I have a SCO Openserver server on the same physical box and it works fine so I know the network card & cable is ok.
View 9 Replies View RelatedHow can I verify the following service configuration files/setup are ok with?(in RedHat)
httpd
sendmail
ldap
DHCP
DNS
SQUID
For example, I can use "testparm" to verify the my samba configuration . I want a similar kind of testing option for the above mentioned options.
I have Centos 5 installed on a PC in the local network. I have installed the RPM dhcpv6-client-1.0.10-16.el5.i386.rpm on this PC to configure it as DHCP V6 client. The RPM was installed successfully, and I have done modifications to the following files:
1. /etc/sysconfig/network, set the networking to yes.
2. /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1 set the BOOTPROTO=DHCP.
Now the problem is when I start the client on this pc as dhclient, it throws the following errors, and logs out after some time. All the network configurations were lost and the PC gets disconnected from the network.
[root@ServerB]# dhclient
Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Client V3.0.5-RedHat
Copyright 2004-2006 Internet Systems Consortium.
All rights reserved.
For info, please visit http://www.isc.org/sw/dhcp/
[Code]...
I am attempting to get this network card running under CentOS 5.2 but have had no luck. Some sites say to use the sk98lin driver, others the skge, which I can't find at all. I have tried multiple versions of the driver in rpm but none seem to work. The card shows under the network manager but will not get an IP address from the DHCP server.
Here are the outputs for this card.
uname -rmi
2.6.18-92.1.10.el5 x86_64 x86_64
lspci -m
04:01.0 "Ethernet controller" "D-Link System Inc" "DGE-530T Gigabit Ethernet Adapter (rev 11)" -r11 "D-Link System Inc" "DGE-530T Gigabit Ethernet Adapter (rev 11)"
lspci -n | grep "$(/sbin/lspci | awk '/net/ { print $1 }')"
04:01.0 0200: 1186:4b01 (rev 11)
lspci -vv
04:01.0 Ethernet controller: D-Link System Inc DGE-530T Gigabit Ethernet Adapter (rev 11) (rev 11)
Subsystem: D-Link System Inc DGE-530T Gigabit Ethernet Adapter (rev 11)
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV+ VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
Latency: 64 (5750ns min, 7750ns max), Cache Line Size: 32 bytes
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 121
Region 0: Memory at febfc000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
Region 1: I/O ports at e800 [size=256]
Expansion ROM at e0000000 [disabled] [size=128K]
Capabilities: [48] Power Management version 2
Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1+,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold+)
Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=1 PME-
Capabilities: [50] Vital Product Data
How to get this working as we have 3 of these cards for computers without a Gb NIC and I don't want to fight with it 3 separate times.
I decided to take the plunge and change the existing static ip configuration for my home network to a dynamic (DHCP) configuration. The DHCP server in this new network config is my gt701-wg actiontec DSL modem.
[Code]....
I'm trying to make a DHCP server work on my CentOS 5.4 box, but I have placed it on another subnet than the one that it is going to serve. I use a helper address on my router to make the the DHCP requests being routed to the DHCP server on the other subnet.
dhcpd.conf file:
ddns-update-style interim
ignore client-updates
ubnet 10.160.195.160 netmask 255.255.255.224
[code]...
I am having several boxex with centos on it. No pb. I have recently setup a new box with centos 5.4 and I am not able to get the network working on it when configuring a static ip.I've configured eth0 and dns using "setup": unsuccessfulI've used the network config GUI: unsuccessfulAnd it is working very well when I let the dhcp getting the setting.I need a static IP.Here is the getinfo output when static ip setup, and below it, the getinfo for dhcp setting
== BEGIN uname -rmi ==
2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 i686 i386
== END uname -rmi ==
[code]....
I have a Lan with 100 computers with microsoft windows xp and vista on it, and I need to build a CentOS Primary domain control- PDC. So I am building a PDC , with samba 3.x +Ldap ( Light Directory Acess Protocol), with static eth0 and DHCP-server( Dynamic Host Control Protocol) on eth1.
Eth0 : 192.168.1.3
Eth1 : 192.168.1.5
Here is the configurations files:
== BEGIN uname -rmi ==
2.6.18-194.17.4.el5 x86_64 x86_64
== END uname -rmi ==
== BEGIN rpm -q centos-release ==
centos-release-5-5.el5.centos
== END rpm -q centos-release ==
== BEGIN cat /etc/redhat-release ==
CentOS release 5.5 (Final)
== END cat /etc/redhat-release ==
== BEGIN getenforce ==
Permissive
== END getenforce ==
== BEGIN rpm -q yum rpm python ==
yum-3.2.22-26.el5.centos
rpm-4.4.2.3-20.el5_5.1
python-2.4.3-27.el5
== END rpm -q yum rpm python ==
== BEGIN ifconfig -a == .....
I had something I think if very odd happen to one of my computers at work today, it appears to have spontaneously switched from having a static address set to getting its address by dhcp.this is a small office with a mix of mostly linux servers and desktops with a few stand alone windows computers, mostly notebooks. Most of the desktop computers get their address by dhcp, they all have NIS /NFS for remote mounted home directories (interchangeable desktops so anyone can log in at any desk). The particular desktop computer in question here has a shared printer on its parallel port, so has a static IP. Yesterday a UPS in the server rack died, after pulling it and plugging things back in and restarting the servers, it was easiest just to reboot all the desktops, everything came up ok including the desktop in question, and the printer did work.
Today I pulled the oversized UPS from this desktop to replace the dead one, and put a more appropriately sized one in its place, shut the servers down again, rebooted, etc,About an hour later someone tells me the printer is not working on the desktop, and after a lot of searching I find this desktop has the wrong IP address, I ran system-config-network and it showed the address was set to dhcp, I changed this back to the correct static IP and things seem to be working ok now.
I got a CentOS server setup as a dhcp server using dnsmasq. I followed this guide more or less: [URL] So, the problem seems to be concerning the DNS server on the clients. In windows I get the "limited connectivity" icon for the network, and when I select troubleshoot it says the DNS server does not respond. Issuing 'ipconfig /all' clearly shows the IP of the CentOS machine as the DNS server, which should be correct, yes?
ETH0 is working as WAN connection and that works great.. no problem with the WAN connection at all on the CentOS machine. ETH1 has the IP 192.168.0.1 and mask 255.255.255.0 When starting eth1, it sometimes says that it can't start eth1 because the IP 192.168.0.1 is already in use.. but that is most certainly not the case. Maybe there's some kind of issue here that messes with the DNS? What's mind boggling is that it works great on a linux machine (dhcp client) and on a windows xp machine. but it does not work on the windows 7 laptop and a vista laptop and a pda device.
configuring DHCP server with two NICs. I need DHCP server with 2 NICs:
eth1 - 192.168.103.11
eth2 - 192.168.123.11
The client also has two NICs and suppose to receive ip addresses eth1 from 192.168.103.0 and eth2 from 192.168.123.0 Here is the dhcpd.conf from dhcp server:
ddns-update-style interim;
authoritative;
ignore client-updates;
[code]....
I'm trying to set up a Linux server and I am new to this. I have gone through most of the configuration using SAMBA 3.0 and when I populate the ldap directory all I get this error before the password request:
Then when I perform an ldapsearch to see if the directory is populated I get this message:
I'm positive all my .conf files are done right.
I am going barking mad with this - I have forward mapping working fine, but my system simply refused to add in the reverse mapping.Anyway can someone with a clearer head and more knowledge have a look at my configs and see if they can point me in the right direction.I've setup the keys and permissions and they seem to be working, local UNIX file permissions are named.named and even 777Nothing seems to create reverse mappings - no PTR records etc.Weird (I am 99% there to blowing my stack and giving up after 4 days of buggering around).
(A) my dhcpd.conf
==============
authoritative;
[code]....
I have an issue with the DHCP clients in a lab environment I am building. The lab is in a dns subdomain but the clients should be able to resolve any machine in the lab subdomain or the parent by using just the hostname. According to everything I have read, the client resolver should do this automagically, trying first the naked hostname, then the FQDN, then walking up the tree of parent domains. But it doesn't.
So I thought I'd just have the dhcp server set the domain search list to include both the local and parent domain. But adding "option domain-search" to dhcpd.conf causes dhcpd to fail on start up. Does the current version of dhcpd in CentOS 5.3 really not support this option?
I was just wondering if someone could tell me the best method to connect all my hardwares together to achieve better result.HARDWARES.Cable ModemNETGEAR ROUTERNETGEAR FS728TS Smart switchLINUX SERVER WITH 2NICS.I want my dhcp server to serve 3VLAN networks. I need someone to show me how to do this. What do I need to do. keep in mind, I want eth0 to be used for public address only while eth1 for LAN. DHCP will be on eth0, but I need LAN on eth1 to be relayed back to eth0. This is my school project.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to install CentOS 5.4 from my local repo, booting the server from centos54-netinstall iso (vmware). I write "linux URL..." during boot. I eventually get prompted for network config, where I choose manual configuration. Hitting OK ignores my config and defaults back to dhcp, which won't work since I don't have any dhcp server available.Whats wrong? Is there a bug in anaconda?
View 1 Replies View Related