There appears to be three rpms duplicated between the base repo and the updates repo:
gnome-python2-gtkhtml2-2.14.2-6.el5.x86_64.rpm
gnome-python2-extras-2.14.2-6.el5.x86_64.rpm
gnome-python2-libegg-2.14.2-6.el5.x86_64.rpm
This causes a big problem for Spacewalk as the packages are non-unique among channels.
I'm assuming these should be in base but not updates?Can they be removed to address this issue?
I have noticed that the updates to my f12 64bit systems are running longer due to the fact that fewer fedora updates are delta rpms. Why is this. I know that rpmfusion updates and other third party updates are not covered.
View 9 Replies View RelatedI just installed F14 (so far I like it ). I had F13 but decided to wipe the old OS and install F14 fresh. In the course of replacing all of my old programs, I had to download several .rpms like the .rpms for the RPMFusion repos and the .rpm for Adobe Reader. After downloading the .rpms to a download directory I ran yum localinstall to install them. The installations went well and I didn't have any problems.
However, now the packages are showing up as updates which need to be installed in the software updates window. I also ran yum check-update and they are showing up as updates which need to be installed. I tried deleting the .rpms and also running yum clean all but they are still showing up as updates which need to be installed.
Does anyone know where we can get the rpms (x86_64) for MySQL v4.0.26 or 27?
We are in the process of upgrading a very old server to CentOS 5 and need to retain this version. We still have a lot of clients that utilize this version.
Just checking to be sure. 5.3>5.4 update went without a hitch:) But a message ran about (/etc/yum.repo.d) CentOS-Base.repo.rpmnew. Comparing CentOS-Base.repo with the new one show the 1st has the correct priorities and .rpmnew does not have the correct priorities. Should I remove the *.rpmnew repo after making sure it otherwise is the same as the original CentOS-Base.repo?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have been challenged to install CentOS occupying just 200 MB. As for now, I installed the OS with only first CD.
Just put :
@core
under %package directive in ks.cfg. I can see the space as of now is:
Code:
# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda3 13G 740M 12G 9% /
/dev/sda1 99M 12M 83M 12% /boot
tmpfs 125M 0 125M 0% /dev/shm
I need to make it to atleast 300MB.I can see those RPM lying in Linux Box:
Code:
df -hyum remove 389*df -hyum remove *ldap*df -hrpm -qa --qf '%11{SIZE} %{NAME}
' | sort -k1n
0 basesystem
0 filesystem
[code]...
I will remove java, selinux-* but what other package I can remove.
Note: I dont need any application to run but just bare OS.
I wanted to upgrade my Apache from 2.2.3 to 2.2.4 because some application issues. where we can get Apache 2.2.4 rpms for CentOS/RHEL build? I say 2.2.4 rpms in Fedora repositories? Will fedora builds work in CentOS/RHEL?
View 4 Replies View RelatedIs there a list of RPMs with known vulnerabilities? I was hoping to run some scripts across the list of currently installed packages vs such a list of vulnerable, to get an idea of what systems need attention. And no, just updating everything is neither an option, nor possible. My servers don't have access (nor do I want them to) to the outside world. Further, being production systems, I can't cause a disruption outside of scheduled down time, and due to running commercial software I can't upgrade some packages due to vendor support issues.
View 1 Replies View RelatedAside from a few minor issues, I've been happy with VLC 0.9.9.
I recently did a yum update to get to Centos 5.5. I've got yum pointed to Dag.
Everything worked fine, until I restarted VLC 0.9.9.
In the update it looks like ffmpeg was updated to the 6.X branch, x264, and how vlc 0.9.9 was recompiled.
wait wait wait.. let me clarify, vlc 0.9.9 still works, but a key function in it that i use has broken.
I am able to do a yum downgrade on x264 and ffmpeg, but I am unable to downgrade VLC because it tells me there is no down grade path. How do I go about requesting the previous version of VLC be added back to Dags RMP site?
I spent sometime hacking on things the last 2 days, and was able to compile using the same ./configure options that were compiled from Dag with ffmpeg 5.2, and x264 and I get them to compile cleanly. VLC 0.9.9 source compiles and the errors I'm hitting go away.
I don't think the ffmpeg 6.X rmp is broken, i just think its to new for vlc 0.9.9 and breaks certain functionality.
I have the following problem. I downloaded openoffice 3 decompressed to the RPMs directory and by using command "rpm -Uvh *.rpm" installed all packages. When I look to the yumex so I can see single installed rpm's. That is OK. BUT I cant start openoffice because I dont know where are executable files. where is their location and where is default location for all installed programs(from RPM)?
View 7 Replies View RelatedAs I was updating machines today, I was wondering... Is there some way to cache the RPM files locally that yum is grabbing? Like many, I have a number of VMs I run, and it most updates are the same between the nodes. I'm guessing I'd need some sort of http cache? Just looking for pointers, not sure what I'm looking for, however.
View 4 Replies View RelatedWe have an appliance with image being installed from CD/DVD installation
This appliance image is based on CentOS 4.7 kernel/installer/etc. Everything works fine, we ship this product for about 2 years. Recently I had to move it (port everything) to CentOS 5.5 Everything went fine and it works fine except one minor thing )) We can't install it from CD/DVD image yet. Actually it start fine, finds kickstart file, creates partitions correctly, copies install image to harddrive, but fails the next step when it tries to install RPM's
The message we get:
Quote:
the file termcap-5.5-1.20060701.1.noarch.rpm cannot be opened. This is due to a missing file, a corrupt package or corrupt media. Please verify your installation source. If you exit your system will be left in an inconsistent state that will likely require re-installation"
can we find logarithm to base 10 instead of base 2 on shell script??i can do it with bc..like 'l(1000)/l(10)' | bc -l
View 1 Replies View RelatedDoes anyone know where I can find RHEL compatible rpms for Bind 9.7 and DHCPD 4.1?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have installed Centos 5.3 64 bit version and run yum update so the system is up to date. However, I have noticed the kernel version that is installed is:
uname -a
Linux elektra.chemresearch 2.6.18-164.el5 #1 SMP Thu Sep 3 03:28:30 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
and when attempting to install from ATrpm.net the nvidia driver I get this message:
yum install nvidia-graphics169.07 nvidia-graphics169.07-kmdl-`uname -r`
...
Missing Dependency: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-164.2.1.el5 is needed by package 1:nvidia-graphics169.07-kmdl-2.6.18-164.2.1.el5-169.07-94.el5.x86_64 (atrpms)
Now, yum says the kernel is up to date so how can I get the nvidia driver rpms to install? The entries in /boot are:
vmlinuz-2.6.18-128.el5
vmlinuz-2.6.18-164.el5
I have checked to make sure that the update repo is enabled. There were quite a few updates applied after the initial installation and the initial kernel was updated as the yum log indicates and also the entries in /boot.
I'm running CentOS 5.4 and noticed that for the past month there haven't been any new updates showing up either on 'yum check-update' or 'yum update' (I'm interested in basic and security updates). Although this may be right, I wonder if there is an online reference where I can check the updates that are released for CentOS (security bulletins) and make sure if there is anything wrong with my update system.
View 11 Replies View RelatedWhen I try and use the YUM command I get the following:
Repository base is listed more than once in the configuration
Is there a way to fix this? I use Centos 5.2.
I need to install some software which allows me to read chm files. I cannot seem to find the appropriate package in the base repository. How can I install such a reader?
View 2 Replies View RelatedMy installed version of Open Office on my Centos 5 box, (3.1.1 OOO310m19 Build 9420) did not have the database component installed. No problem I thought and went to System>Add/Remove software and after logging in as root searched for it. All straight forward and simple. But two packages are listed as available. The package detail for both is identical so which one or both should I install? They are:
1. openoffice.org-base-3.1.1-19.5.el5.i386
2. openoffice.org-base-3.1.1-19.5.el5_5.1.i386
I have tried 'Googling' for both but none of the information availabe, and there is masses, seems offer any clear suggestions of which way to proceed. The first seems to be a bug release but bearing in mind that the pakage detail is identical to the second I am not so sure.
My server is really slow. When I did a top -c or ps aux, below shows up. Shouldn't there be only one? Shall I kill all those processes and leave only one?
3135 nobody 15 0 15900 5232 1860 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.17 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k restart -DSSL
3173 nobody 16 0 15900 5244 1848 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.05 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k restart -DSSL
3174 nobody 15 0 15900 5232 1860 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.15 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k restart -DSSL
5153 nobody 15 0 15900 5228 1860 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.04 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k restart -DSSL
7598 nobody 16 0 15900 5228 1872 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.20 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k restart -DSSL .....
Is it possible to duplicate a disk, then boot on a completely different machine? If so, how would you do such a thing?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a router that is 1000 Base T and two computers each with ethernet cards that support 1000 Base T. All are equipped with Cat 5e cable. Before I had a router that only went up to 100 Base T and I would setup one box with linux running proftpd. On the other box,I would use win xp pro and use firefox to ftp into the other box and download a file. Download speeds went up to 11.2 MB/sec. Now when I switched routers, I expected something like 120 MB/sec but I'm only getting 5.3 MB/sec. What do I need to change?
View 12 Replies View RelatedIn general CentOS search automatically after startup for available software updates.Then after some (~20-30) minutes an icon appears in the toolbar which the user can click and install the updates.How can I manually speed up/trigger IMMEDIATELY the search for updates (without waiting for the built-in search)?
View 3 Replies View RelatedThere have been no updates recently (for almost two months) on any of my CentOS 5.5 boxes when I run 'yum check-update'. I may be misunderstanding the repo setup, but looking at the file mod dates, it seems that there hasn't been an update since 2011-01-06:[URL]...Meanwhile, a prominent North American Enterprise Linux vendor has had multiple security and bug fixes since then:[URl]...Is CentOS 5.5 still getting updated, or am I missing something (quite possible).
View 12 Replies View RelatedAfter doing an update a couple of days ago (had previously upgraded to 5.6), the font size in firefox (file forward reload, etc), terminal and the panel (using xfce) are significately smaller. Searching the web, mail lists and the forums have not resulted in finding anyone else with this problem. I did notice that glibc has a bug that is currently being worked on at Redhat but it is unclear if the font problem I am seeing is related. Note also, that the initial upgrade to Centos 5.6 was successful.
View 8 Replies View RelatedI'm in trouble when I use the command yum, so I can not install anything on my CentOS 5.5 It's the following error: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/os...ata/repomd.xml Error importing repomd.xml for base: Damage repomd.xml file Trying other mirror Error: Can not retrieve repository metadata (repomd.xml) for repository based Already removed the most basic repository did not work. I have done some more changes still did not work
View 6 Replies View RelatedI installed centos 5.3 on my server one year back, it was getting update form yum till jan 2010. but now if i update it through yum it gives following error:
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* epel: ftp.jaist.ac.jp
* city-fan.org: download.virtensys.com
[Code].....
i have a server with 4 x 1 TB SATA II storages. My Raid-configuration consists of 2 Raidset with 2 Raid 1. My Raidcontroller is a LSI-Megaraid. After the installation of Centos 5.4 occurs the following errors:
Found duplicate PV 3auCs5BBXMHt9XRRdaqeY2juPEYMTqM5: using /dev/sdb2 not /dev/sda2 Found duplicate PV AkV8N3myHRgIl2bODWZ5ZSPHx0H6uHPL: using /dev/sdd1 not /dev/sdc1 I bound the storages in the LVM. How can i fix this error?
I'm using hughesjr' kernel-rt and would like to use ext4 as well. Since the stable release of ext4 is in 2.6.28, I'm wondering if there are any plannedupdates to this kernel-rt release? If not, is it possible to patch this version (2.6.24.7-65.el5rt.centos) of the kernel with stable ext4 patches/tools?
View 7 Replies View RelatedThe problem seems to be a memory issue. Seems the problem only started happening after the last few updates. I have tested the memory with memtest and both servers passed. There hasn't been any new software put on the servers for over 12 months. Server 1 - 3 gig of memory CentOS 5.2 - Linux version 2.6.18-92.1.18.el5 (mockbuild@builder10.centos.org) (gcc version 4.1.2 20071124 (Red Hat 4.1.2-42)) #1 SMP Wed Nov 12 09:19:49 EST 2008 Errors in log
[Code]...