Networking :: Public Subnet Behind Router - Use IP Pool On LAN Side Interface?
Aug 5, 2010
following are my Linux router information
eth1= WAN IP= 110.88.89.66/32
Gateway= 110.88.89.65
eth0= LAN IP= 192.168.1.1/24
Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
MASQUERADE all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
[Code]....
My ISP gave me IP Pool 110.88.90.68/29 to use this on my LAN. my question is how can I use this IP pool on LAN side interface. i think now its simple. 192.168.1.0 /24 is my LAN network and I can not change this, because i have near 180 PCs on my LAN.
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jul 22, 2011
I have TWO L3 + router switch (say switch1 and switch2). I created VLAN100 with VLAN ID 100 in both the switches. I created router 192.168.1.1/24 in Switch1. I created router 192.168.2.1/24 in Switch2. Switch1 is connected with 1.x/24 PCs. PCs are configured with 1.1 gateway. Switch2 is connected with 2.x/24 PCs. PCs are configured with 2.1 gateway. Both Switch1 and switch2 are connected by a trunk to carry VLAN100 data.
1)I have few PCs of 1.x connected to say Switch1 Is it possible for PC with IP 192.168.1.100(x) to ping PC with IP 192.168.2.100(y)?What are the configuration required in both switches to make them communicate ? All the device in both the subnets should ping/communicate with each other.
2)Move PC (192.168.1.100) to switch2. Move PC (192.168.2.100)to switch1.What will happen when PC(1.100) ping (2.100) and vice versa?What will happen when PC(say 1.80 in switch1) pings PC (say 1.100 in switch2) and vice versa? What will happen when PC(say 1.80 in switch1) pings PC (say 2.100 in switch1) and vice versa?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 22, 2011
does somebody know how dnsmasq / iptables need to be configured such that requests to my public IP from lan are correctly NAT'ed to the host that handles them? Currently my routing device treats them like "oh, these are anyway for me, gnam gnam" which actually doesn't work.Unfortunatly setting up NAT rules that redirect requests from my lan correctly as they are redirected from wan is an option I would like to use only if there is no other possibility.I would like some kind of solution that treats packets that are sent to my public IP as normal packets that are not looped back before they even get out. So they would need to be at least sent to the wan gateway where they are directed back where my firewall can successfully treat them like all other public requests.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 6, 2010
I will try to explain a bit first about my network typology: I have one cent os 5.5 machine with 2 nics - external one 86.x.x.122 and internal one with 2 IPs: 192.168.1.1 and 89.x.x.121. The ideea is that I have a public subnet (86.x.x.120/29) of IPs which are routable only through 86.x.x.122 so I have a webserver hosted on a different machine with the IP of 89.x.x.122 and GW 89.x.x.121 - everything works perfectly fine, except that I cannot access from the internal network 192.168.1.0 / 24 the so called DMZ (roughly) - the 89.x.x.122.
What really makes me crazy is that I setup the IPtables rules correctly because I can access the webserver from the outside world but I cannot accessit from the internal network...
what I'm missing - why the 192.168.1.0/24 cannot see the 89.x.x.122 machine... What IPtables rules should I add?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 27, 2010
There seems to be a lot written about virtual networking but I am not sure what approach to take in my situation. My local subnet has a public block of 128 addresses. I have a virtual host running on my machine. My machine has a static address and I'd need to assign one to the guest. I have edited the guest's interface file and assigned a public address to it's eth0. However the guest cannot ping out and I can't ping in.
By default the virtual machine manager creates a virtual network (virbr0) and assigned a private address range to it. I have tried to create a new virtual network using a subnet of my public range (/31) but the manager says the range must to a minimum of 16 addresses (/4). It doesn't look possible to achieve my aims using the virtual machine manager.
In the past I have used the procedure laid out here:[URL].. which is to manually create a bridge. I am not sure that is relevant for my 9.10. I think I would have to disable the network manager if I were to do that and I am not sure how to do that.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 3, 2010
I have a registered domain (let say domain.com ) with a web server (www.domain.com) hosted somewhere online.
I handle the mail part in my private network, by giving the MX my WAN IP (111.222.333.444 )and NAT routing mail stuff to the mail server (10.7.167.3) It works fine.
I will have to handle sub-domains (foo.domain.com & bar.domain.com) and also another domain (anotherdomain.com) in my network. In that case NAT routing isn't going to work ...
What do I need to set this up ? I guess I need a DNS server in my network but I'm not sure if there won't be a conflict somewhere with the Registrar's DNS and mine. Or do I have to take the whole DNS of my domain on this new server and make it half public/half private in some way ?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Dec 18, 2010
My router is crap. If I use DHCP it sets all the computers DNS to itself and all DNS requests get cached in the router. It even starts to loose some DNS request if to many are made at once. On my windows PCs this isnt a problem I just set DNS to google's public DNS servers (8.8.8.8 & 8.8.4.4) and bypass my router and ISP alltogether but when i go to pref>network_connections i have to either set DHCP or manual, there is no option to set DHCP with custom DNS.
I'm sure there must be a way to do this in terminal, can someone tell me how?
I'm using ubuntu 10.10.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 20, 2009
I have built a linux router with a pc having two network cards. I am running ubuntu 8.10.
I have enabled forwarding on the router. One network (192.168.1.0/24)is connected to eth0 and another (192.168.2.0/24) is connected to eth1.
The interfaces have addresses 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.2.1.
On any side side of the network, I can ping both interfaces on the router.
However when I ping a machine on the other side of the network, I get 100% packet loss.
I have not touched iptables on the router or any machines.
What I am doing wrong?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 13, 2010
I'm looking for a router than has an RJ45 WAN interface, and at least 2 RJ45 LAN ports.It also needs to have WPA-AES capability and an SPI based firewall.i saw this one but was a bit concerned about the 3G 'tag' in its name. could i safely assume it will function as a normal router?e.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 4, 2011
I installed Redhat Enterprise linux server5. it has two LAN card and two subnet connected to these two LAN card. i can browse network from these two network easily. But i created VLAN on one network card.Now i cant browse network from these VLAN subnet.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 27, 2011
I have a Debian computer with 2 network interfaces. Ath0 for wifi and eth0 for cable.
They're configured as dhcp and are getting their ip from different routers. When I shut down one of the router, it takes 5 minutes for the ip address to "Go away". I would like this to take a shorter time. I figured it must be a setting, but my attempts so far have been unsuccessfull. Is there a way to do this?
I'm using dhcp3-client (dhclient) as my client.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 27, 2010
The challenge: I am trying to setup a piece of hardware that is transparent to the network that transfers ip packets between two interfaces without adding a "hop". Details The particular problem I'm having is that one interface is ppp, the other is ethernet. It is trivial to setup a bridge between two ethernet devices but I am having trouble finding anything for ppp<->ethernet.
Here, the ppp link is an internet connection, and the ethernet connection has exactly one device attached. Once the ppp link is negotiated, I want the ppp peer to think it's talking directly with the device on my ethernet interface and I want the device on my ethernet interface to think it's talking directly to the ppp peer.
Current solution: The best solution I currently have is to alter the routing table. When the ppp link is negotiated, I am given an ip address. I add a route that directs everything to that ip address to the eth0 device. I also set a default route to the ppp device. Now, anything that comes from the ethernet side gets forwarded to the ppp side, and anything directed towards my ip address gets forwarded to the eth0 side.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 2, 2010
I tried to setup a connection as below but face some problem (probably route table setting incorrect). Hope if anyone could shed the light.Basically, I have a PC1 (.1) and PC2 (.130) connected via a PC router. PC router has 2 interfaces: wireless (.2) and ethernet (.129). PC1 connects to PC router via LAN cable/wireless interface, while PC2 connects to PC router via cable. This settings try to simulate 1 wireless connection along the path (and because PC2 is too old to support wireless interface, we need a PC router). These interfaces are all under same 172.16.130.x subnet.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 30, 2010
getting a VLAN router with a wan interface capable of Ethernet and AMT? something under $80-$100 pref.i need to segment a client on my home network.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 13, 2009
the only error message I can find comes from "dmesg|tail"all it shows is
"no IPv6 router"any body know what is going on here or where where to look for more clues the next time I get around public wifi Oh the windoze washers and apple polishers don't seem to have any problems at all
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 10, 2011
I'm using NFS and I have the following problem. After ~100 days, the client and server lose connection, but the client doesn't know about this, it gives no error. The problem is that the changes on the server side aren't visible on the client side.
The nfs options are: "noatime, nolock, hard, udp, notcp, nosuid, nodev, rsize=8192, wsize=8192, actimeo=60"
The kernel version is: 2.6.16.27 built with 250 Hz. Is this an already corrected issue in a kernel version? Or are my options wrong?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 14, 2011
Within the documentation of example OpenVPN setups there is a setup that shows an OpenVPN Server with two network interfaces. One interfaces is plugged into the public internet network and the second interface is plugged into the private network.
Normally I assume that it would be best to place the OpenVPN system inside the network behind the router and firewall and open only the ports needed on the router to allow access to the OpenVPN system. All other router ports would be closed. This is the first example they show. To see what I am talking about see page(s) 6-7 here -> [URL]
If one were to use the two interface public facing setup, when would that setup best be justified? I guess if you didn't want to open any ports on the router/firewall then this could be justified but then you have to lock down this public system individually instead of having it protected by the network firewall.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 22, 2010
I have my centos server behind a Linksys router. I'd like to access the router's web interface to open and close certain ports. How do I access the router's interface ?
Prior to this, I had a windows machine. I could type in the router's IP in 192.168.1.1 in the browser and get access to the interface.
How do I go about now ?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Nov 16, 2010
I need to show an output of the command "show interface status" executed on a server side in new window on client side. In other words: on client side web browser page I would like to have a link which I can click and get output of command "show interface ... status" in a new window. On web server script has to connect to switch/router, execute this command and send output to client window.
where to look, and, may be explain, what can be better for this purpose? I need a clue, because I have newer done it before. It should not be snmp, because I want to view many different outputs and snmp wont help me.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 27, 2011
I'm having trouble getting my Ubuntu 10.04 machine (Sony Vaio VGN-SR490) to connect to the Internet by way of an Ethernet cable connected directly to my router.
I'm able to connect to the Internet using this same cable using a Windows machine, so there's something wrong with the way Linux is configured.
How do I got about figuring out what the problem is and solving it?
Here are my network settings on Linux:
$ ifconfig
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
[Code].....
It looks like the network adapters list is empty. I will now install both Windows XP and Ubuntu Linux dual-boot. I'm still not able to access the internet, even through Windows. I'm wonder if this could be a hardware problem with the computer or a problem with the router itself. Other computers can connect to this same router, and work fine. (That's how I'm posting this after all!)
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 14, 2010
I just had an ATT Uverse RG installed. However my Smoothwall router that previously worked fine with the ADSL SpeedStream is no longer accepting an address assignment DHCP ip address from this new gateway. (3800HGV-B)Any thoughts ideas or experience working with this hardware? ATT only supports Windows and Mac
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 18, 2011
I have a ppp0 entry with post-up options like this
mapping ppp0
map none photon-plus motorola
map timeout: 12
[code]...
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jan 8, 2010
I have 2 x PCs and a NAS. Both PCs have 2x NICS. PC connectivity to Internet is via an ADSL router. Current config: Thus far (by choice) I've used static IPs in the 192.168.168.x range for my internal network, connecting all PCs and NAS via a jumbo frame enabled gigabit switch. This has facilitated moving data between the PCs and the NAS at high-speed. As both PCs also required Internet access from time to time, both are also connected to the ADSL router using the 2nd NIC and using subnet 192.168.1.x. I'm sure some of you are shaking your heads by now, but it works well and has been entirely hassle free.
However, I've an app running on the NAS that I'm keen to get Internet connected also. As my existing network devices are not using DHCP I figured the simplest method would be to change my ADSL router configuration such that it is in the same 192.168.168.x subnet, change its DHCP server settings to serve IPs in the same subnet (but in a restricted range I know won't cause any conflicts with the static IPs) and problem solved. On changing the ADSL router confiruration with all machines already booted up and configured as described above, everything worked. All devices could see one another, and access the Internet. On later rebooting the system this no longer works
- Internet access is fine but PCs don't see one another or the NAS. If I disconnect the ADSL Router from the PCs then all devices see one another again.
- Does having 2x NICS on a single device each assigned unique IPs in the same subnet create an issue and can it be overcome? I'd like to overcome it because making one of my PCs the gateway forces me to have it on anytime another device needs access.
- If I'm forced to use Internet connection sharing with one PC on the network connected to the router, how do I best configure this?
- One of the things I need to retain is gigabit connectivity between the PCs and PCs and the NAS (currently achieved by 192.168.168.x subnet being linked via gigabit switch).
View 4 Replies
View Related
Dec 26, 2010
I am trying to make Apache web server, it's work but cannot be browsed outside my subnet.I am on huge LAN network, not sure how it works, know it have TL-SL2428WEB Smart Switches and probably some kind of DHCP, every user have maximum 64KB, just plug UTP cable, and I have static address on that subnet like: "my.sub.net.ip" witch I know from Java NetworkInteface class or when I try to update IP on my www.dyndns.com Dynamic DNS account with ez-ipupdate, but my subnet is connected to Web with another IP like "my.isp.provider.ip" witch I get from whatismyipaddress.com and I check that is my Cable ISP provider web IP. It is possible that there is more subnet layers between these two IP.Problem occurs when I try to access to my web site from another computer. When I set dyndns host name to be my.sub.net.ip or use localhost everything works fine from my computer, I can access my web site, Apache work, I can use ssh. To illustrate you it work like this: Go to DNS server, find my host name, get my "my.sub.net.ip" and say "This is actually my localhost IP, no need to go on Web, lets loopback". But when I try from another computer even from my college's computer on same subnet it don't succeed. When host name is set on "my.isp.provider.ip" of course nothing works.
We, users of LAN, don't have access to our LAN nor we have admin. For example sometimes we stuck without net and we cannot even press reset button on switches or something like that, we have to wait for day to they, owner of LAN, order some professional to do that. It seems they are just user of Cable TV and IP, and they bay and install LAN without any kind of admin. Also, I use Fedora 13, with httpd, ssh and others packages that comes with Fedora 13 DVD. I know to write bash scripts, use yum, very good in C++ and Java, great programmer, but newbie in networking, , a very little Perl, html, web servers, I heard for DHCP, DNS, NAT, IP forwarding. How you see it is problem in my lack of knowledge about networking. I hope that I succeed to describe by problem with enough details. Please, try to help me. I be very graceful for any kind of help. Don't afraid to bomb my head with any kind of information hard to understand.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jan 1, 2011
I've rent a server from a Germany data center,They use a single IP as their gateway that is not in range of my servers IP,Strangly server is working well and when I use 'route -n' command the gateway which is in other subnet appears properly./etc/sysconfig/network contains no gateway IP and I don't know how they set the default gateway while after reboot the gateway is the same, also the IP is static and there's now DHCP.I need to know how they did it so I can do the same on my VPSes.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 19, 2010
recently I have installed a suse 10 sp2 on my computer. I have a big problem about connecting to my ADSL Router. The problem is that I can't ping the router at all and the Kinternet log is prompted that
status is: disconnected
trying to connect to smpppd
connect to smpppd
Status is: disconnected
error: cannot read real interface for eth-bus-pci-0000:04:00.0
I can easily open the web page of my router with windows OS but in the suse I can not do that with firefox.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Aug 9, 2009
I have 2 NIC's in a box. One of them is external and doesn't matter for this question I don't think.
The other NIC is 192.168.100.3. It hosts an iSCSI Target and SMB Share on my LAN. It's works great.
I have another PC that has NIC at 192.168.100.101 and it hosts my DHCP (Scope: 192.168.100.5-25) server for my LAN.
I have a hardware firewall at 192.168.100.1 and it serves inet to the LAN on a different external connection.
So...
I currently have a WAP (cheap p.o.s. netgear router in WAP mode that keeps overheating). I want to eliminate the WAP device and add a WiFi NIC to the Top PC above.
So, on the first system I would have:
NIC 1: External IP and External Gateway
NIC 2: Static IP 192.168.100.3
Proposed WiFi NIC 3: Static 192.168.100.4
Question:
If I bridge NIC 2 and NIC 3 like this:
# brctl addbr br0
# brctl addif br0 eth0
# brctl addif br0 eth1
Then I simply put the WiFi in Ad Hoc, will another WiFi in Ad Hoc (for example my laptop) be able to "see" 192.168.100.101 (DHCP) & 192.168.100.1 (Gateway) (via WiFI 192.168.100.4 through the bridge to 192.168.100.3 and on to the LAN)?
Also, can the two NIC's be bridge together even though they are the SAME subnet?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 15, 2010
I have read NUMEROUS tutorials and explanations on the net about this, but they all seem to assume an informed understanding of IP networking. I have limited knowledge (basically I know how to set up my own home network and use the normal commands for troubleshooting.).I am doing a project at work which requires networking our new store with our original store (throughA VPN).I am just trying to understand in the most basic way how sub netting and subnet masks work. I don't believe this is necessary knowledge for setting up the network via VPN, but I would just like to understand it and I feel like I will be prepared to study further. basically:
1. How does a network mask isolate a particular host on a network?
2. How does changing the mask allow for more addresses to be used?
For example, if my address is, say, 192.168.1.36, how does 255.255.255.0 isolate my machine to receive traffic? I suppose what I am really not understanding is how it does this with more than one host on the network with the same mask.
View 11 Replies
View Related
Apr 23, 2010
I installed apache2 on my Ubuntu machine and I am trying to access the server from another subnet. The server is connected using ethernet and has a static ip address. I can ping from the server to any machine in the other subnet but non of the machine on that subnet can ping the server. iptables does not seem to be running
Code:
# service iptables status
iptables: unrecognized service
and its rules are
Code:
# iptables -L
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
[code]....
What is preventing my machine from being accessed from the other subnet?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 3, 2011
This is slackware 12. I'm trying to share my internet connection (on eth0) with a computer connected to eth1.
eth0 is 192.168.0.101, eth1 is 192.168.1.100 (different subnets).
But when I try to make eth1's default gateway the same as eth0's, see the error I get code...
View 7 Replies
View Related
