i opened access to [URL](without port limit) in iptables to let my systems to update mcafee, but still get unable to download in mcafee update log.
i have another ip that tried to connect via port 21 on those machines, but the ip is not belongs to [URL], is this possible thats redirecting?
I am using dyndns to keep track of my smartphone's ip address. The idea is to be able to ssh into my home network, protected by an iptables firewall. If I use the command: # iptables -I INPUT 9 -s myname.dyndns.org -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT it updates using the current ip address, but the next time I get an ip address update to my phone and update dyndns to properly provide nslookups, this is not being updated in iptables unless I restart my firewall. Is there a better way to do this?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a valid McAfee account, I am using the Ubuntu OS on my computer.Can i get that McAfee installed on my Ubuntu as Avast and some other AntiVirus seems to be working?
View 9 Replies View RelatedIt seems that on April 1, 2010 McAfee(TM) changed the structure of it's AntiVirus FTP site. Unfortunately, that's the site that naiupdt.pl & uvupdate have been using for years, and now they've stopped working. All of my Linux installations have stopped receiving updated virus definitions, and are now vulnerable. Specifically, McAfee(TM) did away with the 'update.ini' file which naiupdt & uvupdate used to define what updates were needed, changed the directory structure of the ftp://ftp.nai.com site, and modified the naming conventions of the DAT files.
I've tried modifying the uvupdate script myself, but I'm no programer, and I'm failing miserably. So I'm wondering if anyone's already gone through this, and if they happen to have a recently modified version of naiupdt.pl or uvupdate they'd be willing to share?
My Ubuntu 9.10 is intalled on a partition on my computer HDD. The other partition OS is Windows XP. My Windows uses McAfee as the antiviral program. Granted that linux is at a much less risk for viruses, some still apparently can slide through on incoming emails from Windows computers.
1) Will my Windows partition McAfee protect the entire computer?
2) If not, suggestions for an anti-viral program?
i ran this
Code:
iptables -N rate-limit
iptables -A rate-limit -p tcp -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -m limit --limit 3/min --limit-burst 3 -j RETURN
iptables -A rate-limit -j DROP
iptables -I INPUT 1 -p tcp --dport 22 -j rate-limit
i am no longer able to ssh in to the machine , how can i reset iptables and firestarted back to default?
i need to open this address ftp.nai.com, is there a way to use address not ip in iptables?
View 7 Replies View RelatedI've recently moved from Firestarter to UFW/GUFW, and I wonder if someone could confirm if my iptables configuration is secure.
When I enter sudo iptables -L i get:
Code:
eth1 has connection to the net via gateway ..eth0 on the same machine has users on a intranet and needs access to the internet, i need to allow internet connection and prevent packets which logically originate from the internet getting into the intranet
View 1 Replies View RelatedInstalling a router, and I need to completely "wipe" iptables (flush I mean) on both computers, and I think I run ufw/gufw on both, so that would need to be uninstalled. The router is very secure, has NAT, etc, etc, and I'd rather setup all that side of things in one point, rather than on each computer.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCan I have both ufw and iptables running together? My server is currently using ufw, if I add an iptables rule will it have any effect?
View 6 Replies View RelatedTo get my Thunderbird email to work and to do FTP to my website I have to use TERMINAL and enter the following code in Root;
iptables -F
At one point weeks ago I got Gufw and I don't remember if that had any effect.
I suspect this is one of these questions from Window users who see something different in Ubuntu.
My understanding is that the Ubuntu firewall (iptables) is always on. However, the GUI client (firestarter) shows this more obviously.
I suppose I am used to ZoneAlarm in XP where everything was displayed more obviously.
So, iptables in not automatically displayed, but is working, right?
see many threads / websites about how to configure iptables. They say if you use these
rules it will allow http traffic. But they don't work. I like to deny all then allow specific ports open for traffic.So far I tried the script to flush and update my iptables rules, trying to open port 80 and 53 for http and DNS traffic:(I made the script executable, with $ iptables -L -v I can see that the rules are changed after I run the script. )
Code:
#! /bin/bash
iptables -P INPUT DROP
[code]...
I'm running Ubuntu 10.04 LTS as a VM in Hyper-V, and accessing it via VNC with a machine in the same broadcast domain. I'm using OpenVPN to connect to XeroBank. I have instructions for configuring iptables to permit establishing and using the XeroBank connection, while blocking all other traffic on eth0. I've followed them successfully. I need to also permit the VNC connection, and haven't managed that. FWIW, the VM is at 192.168.111.12::5900 and the workstation is 192.168.111.2.
The attachment to this post lists the recommended contents for each Shorewall file. Which files need changed, and what do I add to each?
I typed this into the command line:sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -m time --timestart 12:00:00 --timestop 23:59:59 --days Sat, Sun -j ACCEPTI get this error:iptables v1.4.4: unknown option '--days'How do I do something similar above in which I allow the internet to start at 12 o clock on Saturdays and Sundays
View 4 Replies View RelatedI've recently installed 10.10 server edition, and I must say it was a pleasant suprise, it's just the way I like it. I use it as a squeezebox-server. But I've run into a problem with the firewall. I did a portscan, which told me there are more ports open then I've told UFW to open. Among which port 25 and 119, when I telnet from another PC to those ports, the connection gets accepted, although there is no answer to any commands (as expected, there's no mail server running). Iptables print-outs also don't mention anything about the respective ports or a daemon that could be responsable, and the same applies to "ps -e" or "ps aux".
Iptables seems to be working, when I remove the rules to allow samba to work, I can't reach the shares, and when I insert them again I can reach the shares. "sudo ufw deny from any" as last rule doesn't change anything either (deny incoming is default (although I never issued the command "ufw status verbose" says it is) so it shouldn't, but ports 25 and 119 shouldn't be open either).
Rather than use pfsense, etc I decided to create my own router/proxy etc based on an atom base with 2 nics.Proxy/routing/dns/etc all working fine, I now though want to lockdown the fw rules.ETH1 is the WAN NICETH2 is the LAN NICI'm guessing i want to allow anything out of ETH1, but only allow incoming to ETH1 when its established or related... What about ETH2 though? Any ideas pls? Am used to configuring iptables on single nic, certainly not a router.
Code:
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 18535 packets, 10M bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
[code]....
i dont know why packets dropped? and something else what are those numbers for default policy in [] means?this is rules:
Code:
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.4 on Sun May 1 00:09:57 2011
*mangle
[code]....
can anyone advise the best practice of installing and setting the iptables on U 8.04 LTS? currently iptables is not installed nor as package nor included as kernel module.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm wanting to use mac filtering to restrict access to certain machines. I already know that I can just add MACs line by line, but is there a way to specify a list of MACs? That way it would be much simpler to maintain a list of acceptable/unacceptable hosts.
I'm not going to rely only on this list because of spoofing, but it would be nice as another "layer" of protection.
what do the following two commands do? Do they modify the iptables rules in any way?
sudo /sbin/iptables -L -n
sudo /sbin/ip6tables -L -n
i want to view my iptables log on web interface, with chart (in option, but this is not my priority).
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have tried to configure my iptables to allow only HTTPS connections to the internet. Unfortunately, I didn't get that to work. I configured it like this:
Quote:
iptables -P INPUT DROP
iptables -P OUTPUT DROP
iptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
iptables -A OUTPUT -t filter -p tcp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT
iptables -A OUTPUT -t filter -p udp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT
[Code]....
Of course I am only trying to access websites via HTTPS Still, I was wondering if HTTPS somehow under the hood requires the HTTP port to be open or if my rules are in some other way wrong.
ps: I got the rules from that website: [URL]
I am currently trying to best configure my Natty Narwal linux distro. At boot, the system is configured to automatically connect last Wifi network. When I connect to the WIFI however a whole bunch of instructions are loaded in the IPTABLES.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have been struggling with this for a very long time now. I have installed Fedora Core 9 on my computer. I have set it up as a caching-nameserver and this is working.
Then I wanted to secure my server with iptables, and I have so far made this script:
# Load the connection tracker kernel module
modprobe ip_conntrack
iptables -F
iptables -P INPUT DROP
iptables -P FORWARD DROP
[Code]....
I can reach the dns server with ping. When trying Nslookup it says that it got SERVFAIL from 127.0.0.1 trying next server, and then it times out.
My resolv.conf file lists:
nameserver 127.0.0.1
nameserver DNS-server
Im pulling my hair out trying to get ftp to work through iptables.Im using vsftpd
Table: filter
Chain INPUT (policy DROP)
num target prot opt source destination
1 ACCEPT all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
2 ACCEPT all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
[code].....
I have a problem with iptables, when I execute
[code]....
I am trying to figure out how I can configure IPtables to only allow VNC traffic to an internal server over SSH.
My configuration is WAN < --- > Gateway (Ubuntu 9.10 Server) < --- > Internal Server (that I want to control with VNC over SSH)
I am using Fedora on my desktop pc. I want to know how can i protact my PC from outside world. What firewall policy should i implement in iptables to keep it more secure.
View 5 Replies View Related