i dont know why packets dropped? and something else what are those numbers for default policy in [] means?this is rules:
Code:
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.4 on Sun May 1 00:09:57 2011
*mangle
[code]....
My VPS host a mail, blog and web site. So i want to block port i not use. The port that i use is 80,21,2022,443. The other port will be drop. I want to block bad packet and all packet that not related. Can anyone how to write in iptables?
View 2 Replies View Relatedhow can i drop igmp port 0 packets with iptables rule? my log file is full of this router advertisement.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a server that I can only access via SSH (it's located far away) and I would like to secure it by blocking all ports except the ones that I need (which are HTTP and SSH). I still want to be able to make outgoing connections to enable software updates and other things.This is my iptables -L -n :
Code:
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
ACCEPT all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
DROP tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpts:1:21
DROP tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpts:23:79
DROP tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpts:81:65535
code....
In my opinion, this should block all incoming packets except the ones on port 80 and 22, but allow responses to outgoing connections. But a wget http://google.com does not work, it can't establish the connection.
Maybe this is not the best style for iptables rules, but I want to be absolutely sure to not accidently lock myself out from SSH, so I chose not to configure a "block-everything rule".
Does this configuration not enable incoming packets from connections initiated from inside?
I have tried to google it around and couldn't find any good solution for it. What I want is to hook up to the kernel network hooks and for example investigate all of the packets (maybe keep some in the buffer and drop in the kernel so I could send them out lets say 10 minutes later) but from a C / C++ program perspective / level. I know it can be done via iptables but isn't there a way to do it from a program ?? I have found a library called ipq but apparently doesn't work with kernel 2.6.x anymore.
View 10 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to drop all packets from the internet that use a fake ip address so they appear to come locally.
Do I need both lines or only the first ?
--append INPUT ! --in-interface lo --source 127.0.0.0/8 --jump DROP
--append INPUT ! --in-interface lo --destination 127.0.0.0/8 --jump DROP
I've been trying to redirect all outgoing packets (destined for a specified ip address) from my slack box back to itself. I thought this could be done with iptables, but if I fire up wireshark I can clearly see that the packets are getting out to the real server and I'm getting responses from it.
So here's what I tried:
All looks good and fine, and then I even try to visit 194.28.157.42 with firefox (by the way I am running a webserver, that is set to show a page when you visit 127.0.0.1) and I get an error page that reads: 502 Bad Gateway.
I ignored this message to see what the program I'm trying to interrupt does, and when I start wireshark and then start the program that is using that website, I can clearly see that the packets make it to the real 194.28.157.42 and get back responses.
I am running into trouble while trying to set-up a iptables routing policy. I have two machines on the same sub-network (xxx.xxx.153.0). One of the machines is used as a default gw for the other (xxx.xxx.153.250 is a gateway for xxx.xxx.153.142 and xxx.xxx.153.254 is a gw for xxx.xxx.153.250). There is no explanation for why the xxx.xxx.153.250 is in the middle -- xxx.xxx.153.142 can go straight to xxx.xxx.153.254, but is is like that for now.I am trying to find an iptable rule to be executed on the xxx.xxx.153.250 machine to route the packets.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI had been running my SMTP server with WINE, as the SMTP server software is a Windows-based program (MERCURY), but I cracked the shits with WINE and removed it. Now I am running my SMTP server in a Windows virtual machine.This virtual machine has a different IP address from my host machine, so what I need is for my computer (the host) to redirect incoming traffic on port 25 to the virtual machine at 192.168.56.101 on port 2525.Can someone please help me with it? I think its done with iptables.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to configure NFS sharing behind a firewall, I got it to work and all but I was caught by something that (to me anyways) seems odd.I've been able to mount the export on another computer and am transferring files over as we speak, but I'm just interested in knowing why the RELATED,ESTABLISHED rule seems to be catching almost all the traffic coming from the other node. Any ideas? Should I be concerned that my firewall isn't protecting anything or something?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a very weird case in my firewall.I have an asterisk server and some phones and between them there is a linux firewall based on iptables.With basic rules on iptables everything works ok, but when I put a single nat rule (no matter what rule I use) some packets from some phones misteriously disappear from interfase to interfase.
Clearer:The firewall has two interfases: eth0 (pointing to phones) and eth2 (pointing to asterisk).One problematic phone is 192.168.3.242, so I use tcpdump this way.
if am using --log-prefix "BANDWIDTH_OUT:" --log-level 7 to capture packets, I think is there a way to view these?
View 4 Replies View Relatedi need to write a program in c that can sniff packets from Ethernet and distinguish RTP packets from Non-RTP packets, i have no idea what should i do
View 9 Replies View RelatedI two servers set up: 192.168.1.150 and 192.168.1.160 Initially, I want all traffic to be served by server 150. So for this purpose I am leaving the IPTables on .150 empty. At a point in time, I want to forward all incoming traffic to be served by .160 instead. I have accomplished this using these commands (on .150):
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -j DNAT --to 192.168.1.160
iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING -j MASQUERADE
My problem is that if I have an open SSH connection to .150 (prior to adding the rules), the packets are still handled by .150 after adding the rules.. e.g. my SSH session stays active. I want these packets to be forwarded to .160, which would effectively disconnect the SSH session. I do not want the packets flat out dropped, I just want them forwarded on in whatever state they are in. If I try a new SSH session, it is properly forwarded to .160
I am trying to do something outlandish with iptables (or so I think!).I have a source sending udp packets to a destination (say dst11). Using port mirroring I am able to get all these packets to a different machine (say dst22). I am able to see these packets on dst22 interface using tcpdump.I want to analyze the packets on dst22. So what I do is put dst22 interface in promiscuous mode (using ifconfig eth0 promisc). This in theory should get the packet through the MAC layer. Now using iptables I am trying to DNAT the packets in nat prerouting to change the packets destination IP to dst22's interface and change the destination port.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'd like to (if it's possible, of course) to redirect the packets originated within a linux box, and I've been tryin' to do it through the OUTPUT chain in nat table:
Code:
iptables -t nat -A OUTPUT -p tcp -d 192.168.0.74 --dport 80 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.0.17:80
The policy for the rest is ACCEPT.This redirection didn't work this way. If I do lynx http://192.168.0.74:80 I reach 192.168.0.74 host, so there is no redirection.Could I achieve what I'm needing through with IPTABLES' OUTPUT chain (in nat table)?
I have 3 network interfaces on my Linux Router :
Interface - Gateway - Type
Code:
br0 - 192.168.0.1 - Internet
eth2 - 192.168.1.1 - LAN
tun0 - 10.0.0.2 - VPN (via br0)
What I'd like to do is to route all TCP packets coming from eth2 to tun0 where a VPN client is running on 10.0.0.2. If I delete all default routes and if I add a new route to tun0 like :
Code:
route del default
route add default gw 10.0.0.2
Everything is fine, and everyone on eth2 can reach the Internet using the VPN access. Now the problem is that my VPN client does not allow any other protocols other than TCP. And I also want to allow VPN access only to eth2, no other LAN nor the router itself. use iptables to filter any TCP packets and mark them, so they can be sent to tun0, while any other packets can reach the Internet via br0 (192.168.0.1). I found on the Internet that we can mark packets before they get routed. Using the following commands :
Code:
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j MARK --set-mark 85 -i eth2 -p tcp --dport 80
ip route add table 300 default via 10.0.0.2 dev tun0
ip rule add fwmark 0x55 table 300
First of all, --dport 80 never work... :/ I wanted to filter TCP 80 packets coming from eth2, but none of them seems to be HTTP packets... oO (very strange...). Nevermind, I decided to forget about the --dport option. I use the "iptables -L -v -t mangle" command to see how many packets are marked, and it is working fine, all TCP packets coming from eth2 are marked. Now the problem is that none of them are routed to tun0 they are all respecting the "route -n" rules... and not the "table 300" rule I have created.
I'm trying to use iptables in order to forward all the incoming packets for port 5555 to port 5556 on the same server (192.168.2.101).
I wrote the following commands:
iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -i any -p tcp --dport 5555 -j DNAT --to 192.168.2.101:5556
iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -m state --state NEW -d 192.168.2.101 --dport 5556 -j ACCEPT
I keep finding packets that appear to be whois on port 44. they appear to originate from me to whois.arin.net (2 packets each time) and 199.212.0.43 (also 2 packets each time) when I put 199.212.0.43 in the URL box it says "Failure To Connect To Web Server". when I whois it it says:
Quote:
Available at [url] And yes, I did get the same packets when I used whois. Why is my computer randomly whoising stuff?
I have a small network with 4 users, a Win2003 server for LAN/security functions, and a Dell Blade server running Ubuntu 8.04.1 which runs as our web server on port 80. I manage the Ubuntu server with Webmin v1.42Yesterday, my users weren't able to access the internet nor were they able to receive mail, etc. and no one could access any of the website hosted on the webserver. However, the internal users could access each other's PCs and internal printers and devices - just nothing outside.
I began to troubleshoot: I could see a lot of activity on the Router/Firewall on the port connected to the Ubuntu server. When I unplugged the server, everyone could immedately connect to the internet. So, the problem was originating with that server.When I logged in to the Ubuntu server using Webmin, I checked System>Running Processes and right at the top of the list was the process:ID Owner CPU Command23184 www-data 98.1% ./s 174.120.164.186 7777When I drilled down on this process it said that the parent process was:/bin/sh -c ./s 174.120.164.186 7777I pressed the Trace Process button and it appears to be sending the following repeatedly:Time System Call Parameters Returnxxxx send 125,0123456789ABCDE,15,0 15So, I manually Killed the process and added a rule to my firewall/router to block an IP range that includes 174:120:164:186
A few hours later the same process stars again in Ubuntu,, effectively plugging up my pipeline to the internet and preventing access to the websites being hosted.It suspect that there is some kind of virus on my Ubuntu machine but have no idea how to locate and destroy it. I am relatively new to the Ubuntu world and would appreciate anyone's help immensely! I just don't know what to do!
On April 10, 2010, I upgraded some packages on my Ubuntu 9.04 server. This included an upgrade to "ufw 0.27-0ubuntu2". I rebooted the server, and all appeared to be fine.
Now I've noticed that UFW is not logging blocked packets since that reboot. It used to do this. It is still logging the allowed packets that I've configured it to log.
Here's what a "ufw status verbose" says code...
I was testing the security of my Ubuntu 10.04 64bit install by running a port scan from [URL] and I came upon some odd results. It appears that basically all my ports are closed, but only Port 646 is dropping packets silently. Furthermore, Port 80 is open.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI setup a SSH server on my computer on a very high port, so that my brother could surf the web through my computer from Iran, since the majority of websites are filtered there.
Today, he told me he cannot connect to my computer. That's why, I got suspicious that they are doing packet based filtering instead of port. Then I decided to change the port to 433 for https, but one of my friend told me that they just banned https in Iran as well.
I was wondering if there's any way I can manipulate SSH packets between two computers so that my brother's ISP won't figure out he's exchanging SSH packets?
My machine is trying to communicate with another computer. I�ve blocked the traffic with this machine with iptables (input and output traffic), but I want to find the origin of this traffic. There�re 90% of probabilities it�s a trojan, and I want to find it.I have logged the packets with iptables (and then dropped), but with this I don�t know the proccess source.I�ve tried with netstat -o, but I don�t get nothing.How can I see the Process source (i.e. the PID) of this traffic?The traffic are TCP packets, with SYN flagged active (my machine is trying to establish a connection with that IP).
View 9 Replies View RelatedI am trying to figure out what command to use to show the number of DROPPED and INVALID packets that the firewall is handling.I'm going to put these commands into a log analyzer script which will run every 15 minutes with cron. The firewall is running and operating the way I want it to. I'm running CentOS 5.4.
View 2 Replies View Relatedi have configured racoon (ipsec tunnel) between 2 hosts and i am afraid of unencrypted ICMP which appears in TCPDUMP logs. There ale also encrypted ESP packets. Is this result of wrong racoon configuration?
172.16.220.133
Code:
[root@localhost ~]# cat /etc/racoon/racoon.conf
# racoon.conf
path pre_shared_key "/etc/racoon/psk.txt" ;
remote anonymous
[Code]...
I want to capture all packets from site "www.examplesite.com" so I checked its ip address in an ip address look up and it was 123.456.abc.def.So I set my filter to "dst host 23.456.abc.def"However I then realised that multiple ip address point to ww.examplesite.com, for example say the following ips also go to987.654.321.000111.222.333.444So is there a filter that will automatically capture all traffic going to www.examplesite.com or do I have to go and manually find all it's ip addresses and pass them all to the filter?
View 2 Replies View RelatedIn my network I have 25 workstations and some serves. Everything working in local LAN with firewall. The problem is that on one machine (I dont know which one) is installed software which sending data to the internet. Actually I dont know what it is. Last time as I remember was trojan which can create new network interfaces in windows and send some data to the internet. The half speed of my network connection is used by this infected machine. How can I detect which machine it is? How can I listen/capture some traffic and analyze from which machine I have more connections.
Please take a look on this time. Instead of 141-150ms should be 4-5ms.
64 bytes from web30.ispnetz.de (62.xx.191.74): icmp_seq=1 ttl=249 time=141 ms
64 bytes from web30.ispnetz.de (62.xx.191.74): icmp_seq=2 ttl=249 time=135 ms
64 bytes from web30.ispnetz.de (62.xx.191.74): icmp_seq=3 ttl=249 time=147 ms
64 bytes from web30.ispnetz.de (62.xx.191.74): icmp_seq=4 ttl=249 time=127 ms
64 bytes from web30.ispnetz.de (62.xx.191.74): icmp_seq=5 ttl=249 time=156 ms
64 bytes from web30.ispnetz.de (62.xx.191.74): icmp_seq=6 ttl=249 time=129 ms
64 bytes from web30.ispnetz.de (62.xx.191.74): icmp_seq=7 ttl=249 time=188 ms
How can I detect which machine is infected using only linux and keyboard ?
Battlefield 2 server being attacked by packets that creates infinite loop, then when a player disconnects, server crash.
The packets seems to be always the same.....
Attacker Script: [URL]
Script in action:
[Code].....
I need to find a way to block these 4 packets (i think theyre 4 for what i tested) with IP TABLES.
EDIT: There seem to be other different replies, maybe 1 different but no more.... maybe you can find something useful in the script.
Just wanted input for this script i have cobbeled together. Its not done yet. I am trying to think of ways to close up my outgoing while maintaining full functionality of my laptop ( irc, web stuff, a torrent or two, etc.) . Anyways, I have done some myself; as well as, pulling bits and pieces from other stuff out on the web. I am starting to wonder why i have to write a specific rule to check for spoofed packets if my default input is set top drop. wouldnt it be caught?
Code:
#!/bin/bash
### Laptop + Desktop: No Forwarding firewall ip4 / ip6
### Distro > Debian / Ubuntu.
### oliverteasley@gmail.com
[Code]....
