Ubuntu Security :: Write Allowed Even AppArmor Forced In Firefox
Feb 28, 2011
I use Ubuntu 10.10 with encrypted home. I'm new with apparmor. My firefox-3.6.13 is now in enforce mode - with standard profile. With this profile it should have write access only to:
owner @{HOME}/Downloads/* rw,
But I can save files (with standard downloadmanager of firefox) e.g. in $HOME itself and I can't find any other rule, which could allow that. I have thing, that ecryptfs workaround just affects the eCryptFS "part of things" and limitations of normal filenames/paths (in mounted ecryptfs) are still possible. Why can firefox write elsewhere as in to ${HOME}/Downloads? I get also this in kern.log (but not by saving a file as wrote above):
Feb 27 05:49:30 duron650 kernel: [ 2284.886631] type=1400 audit(1298782170.190:4: apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" parent=1782 profile="/usr/lib/firefox-3.6.13/firefox-*bin" name="/home/.ecryptfs/hugo/.Private/ECRYPTFS_FNEK_ENCRYPTED.FWY1tHLaOszg1UQTPB2f1Zq7Xu 0xztwk9hVX6-OCUaSGk2nU5ADkJx.rdk--/ECRYPTFS_FNEK_ENCRYPTED.FWY1tHLaOszg1UQTPB2f1Zq7Xu 0xztwk9hVXFlmP1qlJBZ2eq7XFiWljUE--" pid=2209 comm="firefox-bin" requested_mask="w" denied_mask="w" fsuid=1000 ouid=0
Why do firefox try to write to it and why do it fail even with #13 workaround?
Feb 27 06:03:23 duron650 kernel: [ 3118.231818] type=1400 audit(1298783003.534:49): apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" parent=1782 profile="/usr/lib/firefox-3.6.13/firefox-*bin" name="/tmp/.X0-lock" pid=2304 comm="firefox-bin" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=1000 ouid=0
Why try firefox to access X lock?
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jul 29, 2011
I am using FF ver 5.0.1 from here After reading [URL] I did Code: sudo aa-logprof /path to firefox Allowed all when asked. But when I try to start FF in enforce mode I get
[Code]....
View 9 Replies
View Related
Apr 28, 2010
Anyone set up an Apparmor profile for Firefox?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Aug 8, 2010
Inspite i have read through the sticky link but i have a query.
Example,
If you have your firefox under enforce mode in apparmor,are you still able to install an update / addon to it to a newer version.
If not,how to disable the apparmor in firefox.Is it as below?
Code:
View 9 Replies
View Related
Nov 12, 2010
Tried the apparmor profile for Firefox. how to turn it off. No matter what I do, it still shows up as being on in apparmor status.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 15, 2010
I'm trying to understand the Apparmor and would like to get FF profile from Bodhi.zazen [thank you],but I'm kinda new to Linux.Did lots of reading but missing one thing:
1.where is FF profile? I can't see any usr.lib.firefox-3.6.12
2. how do I do copy FF profile from Bodhi.zazen?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 29, 2011
Since Ubuntu 9.10 I used:
"sudo apt-get install apparmor-profiles
sudo enforce firefox"
However in Lubuntu 11.04 the "sudo enforce firefox" command does no longer work. It looks like the enforce command is no longer recognised.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 25, 2010
This page [URL] shows how to enable apparmor firefox profile. Why isnt apparmor firefox profile enabled by default? I would postulate that this would be because there must be some limitation by having the profile enabled. If so, what would the limitation be?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Aug 9, 2011
I have quiet splash disabled so I can see what boot processes are run on startup, and I notice that on every time I boot my computer the Firefox profile is skipped. Here's the message: Code: Skipping profile in /etc/ apparmor.d/disable: usr.bin.firefox,I checked /etc/apparmor.d/disable, and see that there is indeed a link to usr.bin.firefox. So I'm wondering how/why it got there. I haven't touched anything in AppArmor since my clean install of Natty.
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 14, 2010
But I couldn't find a modified version of it for Swiftfox anywhere, so I decided to modify it myself. But I'm not 100% sure that I did it correctly, so I thought I'd ask here.
Also, will Swiftfox 3.6.4 be able to use this same profile? I thought it might not because of the new "Out of process plugins" feature being added.
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 28, 2010
While reading some papers on securing apache with selinux, I have tried to bind httpd to port 3000 expecting to be blocked by the selinux, since port tcp 3000 isn't on the http_port_t list. However I was able to start the service...
I'm preety sure selinux is enforcing. Also, if I bind httpd to tcp 81 selinux denies the start of the service, as expected!Did I miss something? Why is httpd allowed to start binded to a port that's not explicitly allowed?
View 12 Replies
View Related
Aug 31, 2010
Or do you just use Ubuntu feeling safe enough without them? If you do use AppArmor and other security measures, what do you use them for? Obviously Firefox and Chrome would be two things. But what else?
View 9 Replies
View Related
May 25, 2011
Following Problem:I am only using Linux at university, so I'm basically beginner. Today for some reason after logging in the the power of the computer went off.After restarting and logging in again I couldn't start my firefox (which was running before).Now I don't know whether it is because I'm still "logged in" with the old account (since logging in on several computers/terminals is no problem), or anything eitherrivial or a real problem...Is there any way to find out if I'm logged in on another terminal, and if how can I close this one (external log out possible)
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 5, 2011
I am trying to set up an automatic backup using rsync and a publickey SSH, which requires using an empty password on the private key. I would like to lock down the key on the server so that it can only run rsync, but my attempts to use a forced command (or any other option such as no-port-forwarding) do not appear to have any effect when I run ssh -v.
I am currently debugging using the following line in ~/.ssh/authorized_keys
Code:
But when I connect, it opens up an interactive command prompt and does not display the "goodbye world" that I expect.
I am running an OpenSSH server on Ubuntu 10.04
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 10, 2011
I set the profile for Firefox to enforce sudo aa-enforce firefox.Does this now apply to all users on my system or just the user I was logged in as?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 29, 2010
Does anyone know if Apparmor will work on the Ubuntu 10.04 livecd? I know there are currently issues running Apparmor on stacked filesystems with aufs. Currently a casper scripts disables Apparmor during boot up. Would be very useful if it could be run in a live session.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 9, 2010
So I activated the Firefox profile:
Code:
And restarted Firefox (even rebooted), but it doesn't seem to be working. When I open Firefox I am able to perform a "Save Page As" in locations I shouldn't be able to, like my Desktop or Pictures folder.
The following command says the Firefox process is in enforce mode:
Code:
Of the following lines, the only directory which is "rw" is /Downloads, why am I still able to write to other places?
Code:
OS: Ubuntu 10.10
Can someone with an active Firefox profile do this simple test for me? Click File -> Save As and try to save somewhere the Apparmor profile shouldn't let you, and let me know the results.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jun 7, 2011
I followed this thread:[URL]...When I get to this part:sudo genprof firefox it does not work in the terminal. Is this still supported for Ubuntu 11?
Also, I installed the profiles. Is something supposed to happen now or do I need to configure them?
sudo apt-get install apparmor-profiles
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jun 12, 2011
Where is some good documentation with concrete examples on the best practices for how to update AppArmor profiles?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 18, 2011
When I enable a new AppArmor profile that is not in the kernel, I've used this command:
Code:
apparmor_parser -r /path/to/profile
But when I recently read the manual for AppArmor, it says to use this command for new profiles:
Code:
apparmor_parser -a /path/to/profile
Have I done something wrong by using -r instead of -a?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 23, 2010
When I use a package manager (aptitude or synaptic) to install updates to firefox (3.6), I get the following error:
[Code]...
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 8, 2010
bouncing icon and spinning icon in toolbar for 10-20 seconds, then nothing. Is there a special log file to be found for mozilla errors? (couldn't find anything useful in or near /var/log/messages or warnings all dependencies of associated programmes seem to fulfil dependencies, but obviously something isn't right. Does anyone else have the same problem?
[code]...
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 21, 2010
I am trying to use apparmor to restrict my file browser, which is Thunar to only let me view the files that are in the home directory and also removable media.I tried following the apparmor sticky with no success.I created the profile and tried editing it and it either started and let me do pretty much everything or did not start at all. Would it be possible for someone to help me step by step to set up a profile for thunar that would only show the home directory and removable media.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 8, 2011
It seems that AppArmor can't be effectively used to protect read access to files from users (including roots). It is possible to create a profile for, eg, 'cat', but then the users can use 'less'.Is this true? Should use SELinux instead for this?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 19, 2011
I have a program that generates large amounts of apparmor log messages. I'm happy to enforce restrictions on the program but I really don't want it to fill my log with messages every time it attempts to read a file.
Is there a way to let it enforce restrictions but not log denials?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jun 21, 2011
i was trying to edit my firefox apparmor profile. I used aa-genprof, and accidentally closed the terminal before the program was finished. Firefox wouldn't load properly after that whenever it was enforced. I uninstalled and reinstalled the profiles, but it didn't help.Finally I deleted the files for the profile itself ... now it will not reinstall them..I marked all the apparmor packages for complete removal and then reinstalled them but it will not put the original firefox profile back in.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 3, 2010
I've read and re-read everything I can find about AppArmor, to no avail. On the whole, AppArmor isn't for me. However, rather than give up on it completely, I have an idea: create a profile that I could use as a template for any untrusted application, with the aim of 1) blocking it from network access and 2) blocking it from installing other applications. I've got as far as creating an empty profile:
Code:
# Generic AppArmor Profile for UntrustedApplication
#include <tunables/global>
/usr/sbin/UntrustedApplication {
#include <abstractions/base> }
What do I need to add to make this profile 100% permissive, except for the two exceptions stated above?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jun 12, 2011
Perhaps it is my misinterpretation of AppArmor, how can it be configured to restrict TCP or UDP traffic to/from specific ports?
The profile "abstractions/nameservice", under the section "# TCP/UDP network access", doesn't seem to lock the application to port 53. What am I missing? Restriction to specific ports is something that systrace can do so I'd expect nothing less from AppArmor.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 13, 2010
Currently the Apparmor program has the notification logs saved to /etc/apparmor/notify.cfg, however, when I try to save the notification after putting my email address in, I get an error saying "Configuration failed for the following operations: Unable to write config changes to /etc/apparmor/notify.cfg"looking inside the folder, I do not see any file named "notify.cfg" BUT I do see so files called reports.conf, logprof.conf, and reports.crontab. I am guessing that the program is asking to save the notification changes to a file that does not exist and in fact one of those three files are the proper ones to use. Well if that is the case then how would I go about fixing this error?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 7, 2010
I get the error message in the subject line, followed by a red failed message.
However, once the system is finished booting, I can log in and
Code:
sudo /etc/init.d/apparmor start
and it starts normally.
View 7 Replies
View Related