Ubuntu Installation :: GNU GRUB Version 1.97 Beta 4 - Message - Minimal BASH-like Editing Is Supported

Jan 8, 2010

After getting some updates like 3 days ago, I get this message: "minimal BASH-like editing is supported. For the first word TAB list possible command completions. Anywhere else TAB lists possible device/file completions. sh:grub>_

What do I do to boot my system? Previously I was able to select from the grub menu. But not in this case. Any suggestions. I have an XP system as well on the same hard drive. I used wubi to install Ubuntu 9.10.

View 6 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Ubuntu :: GRUB: Minimal Bash-like Line Editing Supported?

Nov 3, 2010

I just installed a fresh copy of Ubuntu, dual booting with Windows 7 on one partition, but I'm having problems with Grub. I think I put it in the wrong place when I installed it. At first, it would just boot into Windows. But with SuperGrub I could boot into Ubuntu.

This was the result of the boot info script:

Code:
Boot Info Script 0.55 dated February 15th, 2010
Boot Info Summary:
=> No boot loader is installed in the MBR of /dev/sda
sda1:
File system: ntfs

[Code]...

View 2 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Grub-Minimal BASH-like Line Editing Is Supported?

May 31, 2011

I had a dual boot with Ubuntu 11.04 and Windows vista. Upon upgrading to windows 7, i found my grub to be replaced, with windows boot loader. So i booted from a live USB with Ubuntu 11.04 and followed steps as follows.

1. Mounted the partition where i have ubuntu 11.04
2. mount | tail -1
3. sudo grub-install --root-directory=/media/0d104aff-ec8c-44c8-b811-92b993823444 /dev/sda
4. Reboot

On rebooting, I find grub to open in terminal mode, and does not allow me to log in either in windows or in Ubuntu! All i get is a grub terminal [ Minimal bash-like editing is supported. For the first word, TAB lists possible completions of a device/filename. ]

View 1 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Unusual Grub Minimal Bash-like Line Editing Is Supported?

Mar 21, 2011

Ubuntu didn't start up all of a sudden. It got error and stuck at : Minimal BASH-like line editing - Ubuntu Forums. I tried many ways suggested to go into menu mode but failed. I followed online solutions.. but none of them helped. I tried to list all partitions and I got this: ls

(memdisk), (hd0), (hd0,msdos), (fd0)
i tried
root (hd0)/boot , it said unknown filesystem
root (hd0,msdos)/boot, but it's a windows partition
root (f0)/boot, it said read error

The setup is dual boot with wubi, so i logged on to windows7 and installed partition magic, but i couldn't see the linux parittion, the whole harddisk is 500G, but only 2xxG is visible in NTFS. I used liveCD to boot the system, but when i run sudo fdisk -l, i didn't see anything. I have no idea why it happened, and the last successful log on was in Ubuntu, so i doubt it's due to windows update. I am going to try Solution #1 (10.04) in wubi megathread. Can anyone suggest what has actually gone wrong? WIll i able to recover the data in my linux parition given partition magic cannot see it?

View 6 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Minimal BASH-like Editing Is Supported?

Oct 15, 2010

after downloading and installing ubuntu 10.10 from the update manager (was on 10.04), instead of getting to the interface where I select which version on Ubuntu to use I get this. "GNU GRUB version 1.98+20100804-5ubuntu3 Minimal BASH-like editing is supported. For the first word, TAB lists possible command completions. Anywhere else TAB lists possible device or file completions.

View 1 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Massage Arrived At My Screen:"GNU GRUB Version 1.99"rc1-13ubuntu3Minimal BASH-like Line Editing Is Supported?

Jun 1, 2011

I have a problem with booting my Ubuntu System.I have installed the new version of Ubuntu(11.04) next to Windows XP on my PC. When I restarted my PC I have selected "Ubuntu" from the boot menu. When I did that following massage arrived at my screen:"GNU GRUB version 1.99"rc1-13ubuntu3Minimal BASH-like line editing is supported. For the first word, TAB lists possible command complections. Anywhere else TAB lists possible device or file complectionsgrub> _"

View 7 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Minimal Bash-like Line Editing Is Supported?

Feb 5, 2010

I installed Ubuntu on my laptop yesterday, and now it won't start up. It will ask me what OS I want (either Windows or Ubuntu) and then it goes to a black screen with the "minimal bash-line..." phrase on it. Before this happened, I had somehow managed to get into full screen terminal. I couldn't get out of it so I just hard restarted the computer, and this happened. What can I do to fix it? It doesn't get as far as asking which version of Ubuntu I want to load.

View 1 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: 'Minimal BASH-Like Line Editing Is Supported' At Startup?

Aug 22, 2010

So I turn on my PC this morning, and it comes up with this telling me to use 'TAB' to see a bunch of options I can use, not knowing any idea on how to use them properly I type in 'boot', it returns with 'error: no kernel' and then I type 'exit', it just reboots.

I've scanned endless posts on the forum trying to find the most useful replies and tried to use 'find /grub/stage2' and 'find boot/grub/stage2' and it says 'find is not a command' so that failed. I then tried to find out the partition my installation is in, which is hd0,1 so I tried using 'setup (hd0,1) which returned with 'setup is not a command'. I even tried 'boot (hd0,1) but it returned with the first error 'error: no kernel'. Luckily, when I installed Ubuntu I dual-booted it with Windows so I'm still able to use the Internet but I would love Ubuntu back and I had a lot of important files on it. So does anyone know how to solve this?

By the way, the way I installed Ubuntu was through Windows using 'wibu', it's worked absolutely fine ever since this morning. Oh and I'm using Ubuntu 10.04 (Loopy Lynx or whatever it's called ;p)(Also, for more information this screen appears after I choose 'Ubuntu' from the Windows bootloader, it doesn't even get to the Ubuntu bootloader it just goes straight to that screen)

[Code]...

View 3 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Whenever Try To Boot Up Minimal BASH-Like Line Editing Is Supported?

Mar 15, 2011

Ok now, whenever I try to boot up Ubuntu (I also have Windows 7 installed), this message pops up:

Code:
[ Minimal BASH-Like line editing is supported. For the first word, TAB lists possible command completions. Anywhere else TAB lists the possible completions of a

[code]....

View 9 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Getting Error "Minimal BASH-like Line Editing Is Supported" / Fix It?

May 1, 2011

I tried installing an update for ubuntu but I don't think it shut down properly and when I try to start it up, I get the error "Minimal BASH-like line editing is supported. For the first word, TAB lists possible command completions." The version is GNU GRUB version 1.98-1ubuntu9. I have tried looking into this issue and cannot seem to find a way to boot up ubuntu. I tried typing in "root (hd0, 1)" which it what it was on mine but it the message in the terminal returns "filesystem is ntfs". I'm not sure what to do and I don't want to lose files on my partition.

View 1 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Got Error "Minimal BASH-like Line Editing Is Supported" / Solve It?

Mar 2, 2011

I have a problem with the GRUB menu. When i open my computer it gives me error message " Minimal BASH-like line editing is supported.".I can't get passed that. So, it makes the computer unuseful. Windows 7 is not seen, neither Ubuntu. I am stuck at that screen. Before i was running dual-boot Windows 7 32-bit and Ubuntu 10.10.The GRUB version is GNU GRUB version 1.98+20100804-5ubuntu3I looked everywhere to get this fixed but i just cant seem to fix it!

View 4 Replies View Related

Red Hat / Fedora :: Unusual Grub In Minimal Bash Like Line Editing Mode

Jun 14, 2010

I have installed RHEL5, solved the problems around it and started to set up the GRUB. I have set the menu.lst with simple
rootnoverify (hd1,0)
mkeactive
chainloader +1

and tried to boot the Win7 on that partition. NO LOADER came up and since that moment
Grub is only in "Minimal BASH-like line editing" mode. I have tried all of I have googled, nothing have worked. There is a problem with even finding /boot/grub/stage2, or anything else, grub won't let me mount any partition. When I try to find any file, it says file not found. It is important to say that all I did to cause this was change in menu.lst
rootnoverify (hd1,1) to rootnoverify (hd1,0)m nothing else! There is no logic in this....

View 9 Replies View Related

General :: Minimal BASH-like Line Editing?

Jul 11, 2010

I just installed ubuntu today, and it asked me to install over 200 security updates. When I finished that, it asked me to restart the computer so that the updates will take effect. After Dell (it's a Dell computer) booted, I got a message reading:

"Minimal BASH-like line editing is supported. For the first word, TAB lists possible command completions. Anywhere else, TAB lists possible device or file completions."

View 6 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: GNU GRUB Version 1.97~Beta 4 Error

Mar 6, 2010

I think the pc updated, or at least that is the only thing I can figure. Anyhow, pc froze so I reboot system. I have dual setup, after choosing Ubuntu, I receive GNU GRUB version 1.97~Beta 4 error. I am also told to press TAB for further commands, but none of the commands seem to do anything.

View 5 Replies View Related

General :: Cannot Boot Ubuntu - GNU GRUB Version 1.97 Beta 4

Mar 7, 2010

I have XP and Ubuntu on my computer and both seemed to be working fine but now when I try to load into Ubuntu I get

Code:
GNU GRUB version 1.97~beta 4
[minimal BASH line editing is supported for the first word. TAB lists possible commandvcompletions. Anywhere else tab lists possible device/file completions
sh:grub>

View 14 Replies View Related

General :: Recover From Gnu Grub Version 1.97 Beta 4 Prompt?

May 28, 2011

how recover from gnu grub version 1.97 beta 4 prompt (ubuntu)

View 3 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Grub2 Editing - Editing Directly To /boot/grub/grub.cfg?

Jun 6, 2010

I have an old laptop that I installed EasyPeasy Lucid on. I have never used Grub2 as my other Ubuntu installs still use Grub Legacy. I have studied all the tutorials which instruct that the grub.cfg file should not be edited directly.This old laptop has one of the dreaded Intel graphics chips for which the kernel automatically loads the i915 module. Of course (like a multitude of others with Intel graphics and Lucid) I booted into a black screen but knew the workaround was to enable mode setting through grubI used the

Code:
i915.modeset=1
and added it to /etc/default/grub line GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX, just after "quite splash", just

[code]....

View 9 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: 9.04 - Skype Beta For 8.10 Version Will Not Start

Feb 24, 2010

I am still fairly new at using Ubuntu however I have Ubuntu 9.04 64b installed on my newly constructed Intel dual core PC. Everything is working fine however I have just installed the Skype beta deb package for Ubuntu 8.10+ 64b and it won't let me sign on. The installation as far as I know went fine however when I go to enter my UN and PW the "Sign In" button will not light up.

View 1 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Input Not Supported (Error Message)

May 27, 2011

I recently tried to upgrade from Ubuntu 10.10 to 11.04. At first, the installation seemed to go smoothly, but when I tried to boot up, my screen displayed the following error message:

Input Not Supported

I am unsure how this is happening, since I was able to install 10.10 successfully. To better assist, I am attaching detailed information about my computer system.

View 5 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: GRUB Won't Load Win7 After Update To Beta 1

Mar 25, 2010

Just update ubuntu to beta 1. When I try to load win7 it just all a get is the blinking underscore in the top left corner. What did i do wrong?

[Code]...

View 4 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: 11.04 Beta - Grub Error On Natty Upgrade

Apr 11, 2011

My current setup was:
4 x 500 gb hard drives in (software / onboard controller) Raid 10 (1 +0) with Windows 7 x64 as the primary OS
1 500 gb hard drive with Ubuntu 10.10 installed

After upgrading to Ubuntu 11.04 Beta, I hit the Grub Error. I have removed the 5th HDD but still getting it on boot into Windows 7. I am currently in the process of copying all files from my raid via a 10.10 flash drive boot (fortunately was able to mount my raid's partitions).

View 3 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Editing Grub For Vmalloc?

Jul 26, 2010

I want to edit a grub file, but none of the online instructions exactly match my files. I'm trying to follow the instructions to add vmalloc=256M to a grub file, from here:

[Code]...

View 1 Replies View Related

Fedora Installation :: Boot - Grub Drops Into Its Minimal Shell And Gives A Command Line

Jun 12, 2009

I'd like to say I'm very impressed with Fedora 11. I'm a long time Linux user and I've tried many distros. But, I usually keep only the best on my laptop. For a long time that was Ubuntu but, I think Fedora 11 has made some key improvements over Ubuntu and I'm eager to switch. The problem is: I haven't been able to run Fedora as anything other than on the Live CD. Everything works perfectly and it installs but, when I reboot, Grub begins. Instead of booting, however, Grub drops into its minimal shell and gives me a command line.

I've tried installing it a number of ways now and have read much about the problems with Ext4 on Grub and took special care to see that Grub has its own, separate, /boot ext3 partition. Even then, no luck. My hardware should work fine. I've got an HP DV-5 with 4GB RAM, AMD Turion 64-bit dual-core @ 2 Ghz, and an IDE 250GB hard drive. I'm working with the 64-bit Fedora 11 Live disc with KDE as the Gui.

View 10 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Editing Grub Boot Menu With 10.04?

May 7, 2010

I used to be a pro at editing Grub's menu.lst file so I could have my menu look clean, simple, and easy to read. Now that I have set up 10.04 (Working beautifully now after a couple setbacks) the menu.lst file is no longer where it used to be (/boot/grub/menu.lst)

How do I edit my boot menu now?

View 5 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Installing 10.04 Alternative - Editing Grub?

Oct 8, 2010

I am currently installing the Ubuntu 10.04 Alternative, as I am having problem with video card. What I know is that I need to edit the Grub file in /etc/default/grub and add i915.modeset=1 for my video card. What I don't know is how to do that in the command line, what application should I use and how to save it? Also, if everything works well, I want to boot to gnome automatically. What I am looking for is a step by step instructions (as I can get lost).

View 8 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Creating An Extremely Minimal Version Of Xubuntu Using XFCE - Go With Mini.iso Or The Xubuntu Alternate Install CD ?

Jan 12, 2010

I was thinking of creating an extremely minimal version of Xubuntu using XFCE. I have a Dell Mini 9, a netbook that uses a wireless-g card requiring bcmwl-kernel-source to work.What I would like to do is use either the alternate CD or mini.iso minimal install file to perform a command line install-style installation of the system.So far, what I am thinking (from reading this [url].... article:

HTML Code:

http:[url].....is to start off with these packages to begin with:

xorg
slim (if possible with 9.10, unsure if it is still available. in short, i want to use a lightweight display manager)
xfce4
xfce4-goodies
xubuntu-default-settings
bcmwl-kernel-source
aptitude

My opening questions are: Should I go with mini.iso or the Xubuntu Alternate Install CD (or the Ubuntu one)? If so, which one? What additional packages will I need to make the hardware accessible and fully functional? All I can think of so far would be sound (I'd like to stay away from PulseAudio if possible, it wreaks havoc with my computer), my webcam, and the memory card slot, if additional packages are needed for it?What other "core" packages should I include in this list? Should I include Synaptic, or other packages, and why?What do I need to take into consideration, since this is both a directly- and battery-powered computer?

HTML Code:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1155961
post regarding a "Ubuntu-Desktop-Minimal"-type system.

View 5 Replies View Related

Fedora Installation :: Adding A Ɖ' To End Of Grub Line + Beta --> Production?

Nov 5, 2009

- Off a vanilla F11 livecd install, I stuck a 3 at the end of my grub line to boot into runlevel 3. I have been doing this for as long as I can remember (since Fedora 3). However now it seems to break and gives me a GRUB error. I press e to edit, and delete the 3. BUt it still throws and error?!?!?!?! Has this facility (ie sticking a number at the end of the grub line) been changed and why is my grub line now broken even though I've gone back and deleted the 3?

- If I install Fedora 12 beta now, will yum take me all the way into production when it goes live (assuming no killer bugs encountered), I'm guessing thats a yes?

View 4 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Editing Grub / Menu Of Startup Options?

Feb 6, 2010

Would like to eliminate from the Grub menu of startup options all but the latest kernel update? Have made some attempts, but don't have authority is the message.

View 2 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Editing GRUB Settings - Set Windows 7 64 Bit As Default OS In The Boot Loader Instead Of 10.10

Jan 18, 2011

I am a new Ubuntu user, and I am attempting to set Windows 7 64 bit as my default OS in the boot loader instead of Ubuntu 10.10. I have entered the command gksudo gedit /boot/grub/menu.lst into terminal, and the menu.lst file does open. However, this file appears to be completely blank, which does not seem to make sense and is preventing me from changing the boot order.

View 4 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Upgrading From 10.04 Beta 1 To Beta 2?

Apr 4, 2010

So here's the schedule for 10.04:

April 8th, 2010 - Beta 2 release;
April 22nd, 2010 - Release Candidate;
April 29th, 2010 - Final release of Ubuntu 10.04 LTS.

If I have 10.04 beta 1, could I just continue to update and not have to burn another disk to install? Or do I have to burn the beta 2 and reinstall if I want it?

View 9 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved