Software :: Scribus Installation "python-tk" - "could Not Mark All Packages For Installation Or Upgrade"

Apr 6, 2010

When I tried to install scribus, it shows: could not mark all packages for installation or upgrade. The following packages have unresolvable dependencies. Make sure that all required repositories are added and enabled in the preferences. python-tk: Depends: python (<2.6) but 2.6.2-0ubuntu1 is to be installed

View 1 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Ubuntu :: Can't Mark All Packages For Installation Or Upgrade

Aug 13, 2010

I just started having a problem with my ubuntu Jaunty.When I try installing Gimp and VLC through Synaptic I get the following error Could not mark all packages for installation or upgrade The following packages have unresolvable dependancies. Make sure that all repositories are added and enabled in the preferences

gimp:
Depends: libgimp2.0 (>=2.6.10) but 2.6.6-0ubuntu1.1 is to be installed
Depends: libatk1.0-0 (>=1.29.3) but 1.26.0-0ubuntu2 is to be installed
Depends: libc6 (>=2.11) but 2.9-4ubuntu6.2 is to be installed
I get similar message for VLC as well

I installed Amarok after this problem started and it installed properly.

View 9 Replies View Related

Debian :: Could Not Mark All Packages For Installation

Sep 7, 2011

HW:ACER ASPIRE 4920G with ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT. I installed debian sid from latest daily testing businesscard the day before yesterday. I did a fresh install,I select LXDE for desktop and checked standard & desktop packages while installing. I got a complete blank screen with broken color when I restart pc while I finished installing. I did a web search and add radeonhd.nomodeset=0 to grub and I run into LXDE. But I still get a problem. I tried to install gnash & gnash-common. I got E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.

Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done

[code]....

View 1 Replies View Related

Debian Multimedia :: Could Not Mark All Packages For Installation

Apr 12, 2010

I'm running Debian sid on a 64 bits system. I need to install ia32-libs to install 32 bits packages (especially for skype).The problem is the following:

root@debian:/home/pierre# apt-get install ia32-libs
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree 

[code]....

View 2 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Unable To Mark Any Packages (AFAIK)

Jun 17, 2010

I cannot install java (or the restricted plugins) at all . Can anyone send me your "lucid" sources.list while I'm at it?

View 2 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: 10.10 Synaptic "Mark Packages By Task" MISSING?

Oct 12, 2010

The Synaptic Package Manager in Ubuntu 10.10 no longer has the option "Mark Packages by Task". In previous versions it was under the "Edit" menu.Is there a way to get it back or is it hidden in other menus?

View 4 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Missing Python Packages Or Dependencies With F10->F12 Upgrade Breaks Yum?

Dec 15, 2009

I just finished upgrading the last of 3 machines from F10 to F12 using preupgrade (all i686). Except for a non-critical hplip issue, all went well with the first two machines upgraded 1 week and 3 days ago, but some python F10->F12 updates were missing on the third machine that I upgraded yesterday, leaving yum inoperable. Thanks to good yum error messages, I was able to resolve the problem (I think), but I thought I should post to check if mine is a unique or common problem, to enquire if it may have resulted from some of the python packages being in "update transit" in the repositories, and/or whether something like this can be avoided in future? Details follow:

Upgrade appeared to go well except for some dejavu font dependency issues (experienced on all three machines) and libcrypto.so.7 missing for eet-1.2.2-4... (third machine). However, there was a boot message that some python module (can't remember which) was not present for some nvidia requirement, although video driver worked fine. When testing yum: First it complained that libpython2.6.so.1.0 was not present. Since that module conflicted (identified by rpm) with various python 2.5.*f10 packages that that were still on board, I copied libpython2.6.so.1.0 (from a current f12 rpm) into /usr/lib manually. Second, yum complained that urlgrabber was not available, so rpm with the latest python-urlgrabber for f12 solved that.

Third, yum complained that pycurl was not available, so rpm with the latest python-pycurl solved that. Yum now works! and boot message is gone! I ran "yum install python-libs" to make sure that any necessary dependencies were met following my manual installation of libpython2.6.so.1.0, which resulted in a bunch of python dependencies being upgraded as a result.

View 1 Replies View Related

Fedora Installation :: Python Error When Trying To Upgrade F13 To 14?

Nov 27, 2010

I'm encountering a python error in the beginning of the upgrade. See screenshot. How can this be solved or should I indeed file a bug report? Problem is that except for taking the picture, I've been unable to save the info.

View 3 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Python Imploded On Upgrade?

May 1, 2011

On upgrade I ran into this catch-22, and have almost 500 packages in limbo because of it. Any ideas on how to fix python-gobject or pycompile or whichever is angry?

Setting up python-gobject (2.28.3-1ubuntu1) ...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/pycompile", line 322, in <module>
main()
File "/usr/bin/pycompile", line 299, in main
options.force, options.optimize, e_patterns)

[Code]...

View 4 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Upgrades Held Back - Two Packages - Grayed Out And Do Not Upgrade In Upgrade-manager

Mar 29, 2010

I'm running 10.04 and for several days now I get two packages that are grayed out and do not upgrade in upgrade-manager.

If I use the shell and apt-get I get the following message: The following packages have been kept back: firefox-gnome-support update-manager

The system is functioning well, but these 2 packages just linger as I process probably hundreds of lucid upgraded packages.

View 1 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Python -> Upgrade 9.10 To 10.x From Command Line?

Oct 7, 2010

I had problems with python stuff and so update manager did not work. Also many other problems, PiTiVi was installed but did not start eg... After many trials of this and that I removed python-gtk2 and so also ubuntu desktop. But was unable to get it back. Now I cannot even shut down. While it is not possible to install desktop or anything else, would it be possible to fix this by upgrading the whole system to 10.04 (10.10?)? Would it fix python installation. How could I do it. Some info tells to change sources.list and run apt-get upgrade, but some tell not to do so.

t@t:~$ update-manager
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/update-manager", line 26, in <module>

[code]....

View 9 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Python-lazr.uri After Upgrade To 10.04LTS 64bit?

May 28, 2010

After upgrading to 10.04LTR 64bit I encountered this problem below... I have already tried -f / --configure to no avail.

@ASUS-AMD64:~$ sudo apt-get upgrade Reading package lists. Building dependency tree Reading state information Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. After this operation, 0B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y
Setting up python-lazr.uri (1.0.2-1) dpkg (subprocess): unable to execute installed post-installation script: Exec format error dpkg: error processing python-lazr.uri (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 Errors were encountered while processing: python-lazr.uri E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

View 6 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: 10.04 Upgrade - Some Packages Are Broken

May 16, 2010

Am trying to upgrade from karmic 9.1 to lucid 10.04 and have the problem that as part of the upgrade I get a report that some packages are broken. As suggested posting the relevant files APT and MAIN Logs from the /var/log/dist-upgrade below.

View 4 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Upgrade Without Default Packages?

Oct 11, 2010

I've just upgraded 10.4 to 10.10 and everything works fine and looks good but I now have the usual palaver of needing to remove some default packages that have been installed but which I don't want such as Empathy and Evolution. Is there any way to upgrade to a new release without getting all the default software packages?

View 1 Replies View Related

General :: Get Apt-get To Install Python Packages For A Different Version Of Python?

Oct 27, 2010

in ubuntu 10.10, I have installed python 2.7. I would like to use apt-get to install packages to this version of python but I haven't been able to figure out howThings I have tried without success:changing the symlink at /usr/bin/python to point to /usr/bin/python2.7 - even after doing this apt-get still installs stuff to python2.6.Set up python2.7 as the primary alternative using update-alternatives - doesn't work

View 3 Replies View Related

Fedora Installation :: 13 Upgrade: Remove Fc12 Packages?

Jun 7, 2010

I had a fairly smooth upgrade process using PreUpgrade on my main workstation, but I still have a huge bunch of fc12, some of which have fc13 analogs installed, some of which don't (a total of 317 packages). Also, I still have the Constantine gdm theme, probably as a symptom of these lingering packages. Can I just yum erase these? Do I need to check which have analogs in fc13? I don't know which step of the upgrade I forgot, but it seems I'm stuck somewhere in between, although

Code:

joel@localhost: ~> cat /etc/fedora-release
Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

View 10 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: 9.10 To 10.04 Upgrade Failing To Fetch Packages

May 4, 2010

I'm trying to upgrade my 9.10 desktop to 10.04, and it is failing to fetch the following two packages:

[URL]

I've made sure everything is patched current prior to the upgrade and have tried clearing out the contents of /var/cache/apt/archives/partial first as well to no avail.

View 3 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: 9.10 Upgrade - What Packages Are Installed By Default

May 25, 2010

Since I had problems with Openoffice since the upgrade to 9.10, I've tried to uninstall all openoffice. I've searched for 'openoffice' in synaptic and uninstalled all thet I've found. It has uninstalled many other things, thunderbird, firefox and god only knows what other. Now, there is a way to know what are the packages installed by default? Or, to install all the dafault packages? Or, there is a log of what I've uninstalled?

View 1 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: 10.04 To 10.10 Upgrade - Xorg Broken Packages

Oct 12, 2010

Here is the apt.log from running 'do-release-upgrade'. apt-get upgrade runs without issue and I have disabled all of the extra repos I had (opera, tor, lucid-propsed, chromium). My system is otherwise 100% up to date with apt-get dist-upgrade and apt-get upgrade. I have already purged all of my PPAs using 'ppa-purge', but it looks like there are remnants of xorg-edgers in there somewhere: [URL]

View 4 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Installed Packages That Are Newer Than Those In Upgrade?

Nov 13, 2010

After upgrading from one version of Ubuntu to another, what happens to packages that have been installed prior to the upgrade that have higher version numbers (are newer) than the ones that are supposed to be installed via the Ubuntu upgrade?Specifically, I'm referring to compiling the latest version of FreeType to try to alleviate some dependency issues related to compiling Wine (I need a custom Wine patch), and I was wondering what would happen if I had a newer version of FreeType installed if I then later upgraded from Lucid to Maverick, and if Maverick used an older version of FreeType by default than the one already installed on my system.

View 5 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Could Not Determine The Upgrade/broken Packages?

Feb 27, 2011

I have been upgrading 10.4 to 10.10, but in the middle of the new package download my computer turned off (outage). Now Ubuntu won't restart the upgrade or install the packages already downloaded; it tells me it "Could not determine the upgrade" and that unresolvable problems occurred, caused by held packages. How can I reset things to restart the upgrade?

View 4 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Broken Packages Required For Upgrade?

Mar 21, 2011

I keep on getting this red " - " icon on my panel and I try to perform the upgrade it prompts me to do. But it says that there are 3 broken packages i need to fix with the "broken filter". How do I fix this so I can upgrade?

View 2 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: 11.04 Upgrade Safe On Setup With Packages?

Apr 28, 2011

I want to upgrade to 11.04 but I'm extremely scared of breaking my installation. First of all, I have all that experimental Compiz bling installed, does it break anything with Natty's Compiz? It obviously won't work because Natty uses 0.9 while Maverick uses 0.8, but I don't want any dummy plugins or anything. Also, these plugins are way too cool to miss (I just installed them and now I can't live without the extra eye-candy). And what's with my awkward startup settings? I have a compiz --replace --loose-binding command in there and many disabled docks that, in KDE, all launch simultaneously (including Compiz, which renders everything unusable) and completely screw the desktop (I stopped caring about KDE now). Also, my setup feels like my computer's going to blow up any minute while upgrading because of too much dull packages, including gnome-shell which I don't use after all. My computer is, in terms of packages, a complete junkyard! So, is it safe to upgrade with this setup, if yes, tell me the recommended way to do this (CD, update manager?) or if not, how do I scrap that from my updates forever? By the way, will the upgrade also ruin KDE?

View 9 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: 11.04 Upgrade - Packages Have Unmet Dependencies

Apr 29, 2011

I am trying to upgrade to ubuntu 11.04 from my current 10.10 system. If I try to upgrade with Upgrade Manager it stops at calculating upgrade step and I can see red circle at top left corner, hovering over this gives message -
An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade.
Please report this bug against the 'update-manager' package and include the following error message:
'E:Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused by held packages.'

If I run
sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Failed

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libappindicator1 : Depends: libdbusmenu-gtk3 but it is not going to be installed
Recommends: indicator-application (>= 0.2.93) but it is not going to be installed
overlay-scrollbar : Depends: liboverlay-scrollbar-0.1-0 but it is not going to be installed
python-aptdaemon-gtk : Depends: python-aptdaemon.gtk3widgets (= 0.41+bzr646-0ubuntu2) but it is not going to be installed
python-couchdb : Breaks: desktopcouch (< 1.0) but 0.6.9b-0ubuntu1 is to be installed
python-desktopcouch-records : Conflicts: desktopcouch (< 1.0.7-0ubuntu2) but 0.6.9b-0ubuntu1 is to be installed
E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused by held packages.

View 5 Replies View Related

Software :: No Packages Installation - Always Fails For Glibc Upgrade

Aug 4, 2009

I somehow landed into this situation (don't really remember how), but no package installation/removal seems to be possible for me. Neither apt-get -f install or autoremove seems to work.

When I do: sudo apt-get -f install I see the following:
- uname -a: Linux konnichiwa 2.6.27-11-generic #1 SMP Wed Apr 1 20:53:41 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux (Jaunty 9.04, Ubuntu)
- Configuring libc6 screen with <yes>, <no> appears.
- Click on <yes>.
- It fails with this error:

Code:
konnichiwa% ruby apt-get install -f
ruby: No such file or directory -- apt-get (LoadError)
konnichiwa% ruby apt-get -f install
ruby: No such file or directory -- apt-get (LoadError)
konnichiwa% sudo apt-get -f install
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done

The following extra packages will be installed:
libc6
Suggested packages:
glibc-doc

The following packages will be upgraded:
libc6
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1025 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B/4776kB of archives.
After this operation, 217kB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]?

Preconfiguring packages ...
(Reading database ... 146055 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace libc6 2.8~20080505-0ubuntu9 (using .../libc6_2.9-23_amd64.deb) ...
Checking for services that may need to be restarted...
Checking init scripts...
Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.9-23_amd64.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/locale', which is also in package belocs-locales-bin
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.9-23_amd64.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

View 3 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Aptitude Wants To Remove Many Packages Post Upgrade

May 13, 2010

Using Xubuntu,I have upgraded from Karmic to Lucid. Post upgrading when attempting to install a new package with aptitude, it is reported that cups is "BROKEN" and a host of packages are marked for removal.

View 1 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Upgrade From CD Fails / Needs Internet Connection / Not Using Packages On Cd

Oct 11, 2010

I use the CD upgrade method to upgrade my kubuntu 10.04 to 10.10.Not to mention,the ISO image of the CD is this one :kubuntu-10.10-alternate-i386.iso.At the first run I choose YES for the prompt asking for internet connection or whatever, but I immediately realise that I have chosen a wrong option, so I exit and restart the upgrade all over again.On the second run, I choose NO for the prompt , then the installation continues until it reaches the 'fetching files' stage. It pops up and says "The upgrade has aborted. Please check your internet connection or installation media and try again. All files downloaded so far are kept."

I don't want to reinstall the whole system again because I want my applications;I don't want to use the updater to upgrade because I have a low internet speed .

View 5 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Can Stop During 'Getting New Packages' Stage Of Disto Upgrade?

Oct 28, 2010

Can i stop during the "Getting new packages" stage of a disto upgrade?

View 1 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Back To Original Packages After Upgrade/install?

Dec 14, 2010

I just did a fresh install from 8.04 to 10.04 with separate "/" and /home partitions. I really wanted a new 10.04 system to start from scratch and rebuild it again & differently. Instead I got a really messed up system. Is there any way to change it to a fresh new 10.04 install. That nothing has been added to yet?

This is very important because on 10.04 my video card won't handle all the mods that I had on 8.04 and my system freezes very soon after I log on.

View 6 Replies View Related

Debian Installation :: Packages (Security Sensitive) In Aptitude Safe Upgrade?

Feb 17, 2011

Today I ran
aptitude update && aptitude safe-upgrade
Like I regularly do, and I see these two packages need to be upgraded:
login passwd

Since these packages seem kinda security-sensitive I would like to know exactly why I would need to upgrade them. I checked Debian's security list but couldn't find anything relevant, and the links to the changelog for both packages are broken:
The requested URL /changelogs/pool/main/s/shadow/shadow_4.1.4.2+svn3283-2+squeeze1/changelog was not found on this server.
Where can I see what is changed in these packages so I can safely upgrade?

View 3 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved