In my linux machine i installed snmp and try to change the port number, but i got the following error" snmpd dead but subsys locked "in /var/log/messages Error opening specified endpoint "udp:1161"Server Exiting with code 1
View 4 Repliesi want to port snmp-5.5 into dm6467.so i configured net-snmp for target.when i cross compiling netsnmp for dm6467,i am getting this error
mibII/at.c: In function `ARP_Scan_Next':
mibII/at.c:738: error: `ifIndex' undeclared (first use in this function)
mibII/at.c:738: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
mibII/at.c:738: error: for each function it appears in.)
Iam using snmp to access the remote system data.But according to the requirement iam encoding the snmp request data to OAMPDU packet format and sending to remote system.the remote system receives the OAMPDU packet,decodes it and is sending the snmp packet to snmp agent through UDP socket which is bind to port 161.but iam unable to receive the response from snmp agent.i have created a udp socket which is bind to 161 port to receive the response.
if i use any other free port number other than 161 for receiving snmp agent is not sending the response to that port.can any one please suggest me how to overcome this problem.Can we configure the different ports for tx,rx ?How do we know on which port does snmp sends the response ???
In cisco 6509 switch port 1status is being traped it is showing "SNMP CRITICAL - *down(2)*"
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to configure SNMP service to send traps to SNMP server. I've installed net-snmp-utils, now I need to configure the "snmpd.conf" file...
View 2 Replies View RelatedI want to do a simple port redirect, i.e. whatever comes trough whatever interface on port AAAA will get redirected to port BBBBI thought that iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING --source 0/0 --destination 0/0 -p tcp --dport AAAA -j REDIRECT --to-ports BBBBhowever it doesn't work, e.g. nc -v -w2 -z localhost AAAA gives:
nc: connect to localhost port AAAA (tcp) failed: Connection refused
while
nc -v -w2 -z localhost BBBB
[code]....
I have a mail server i need it to send message via port 587 not port 25, i make some changes to my postfix server which i use and it is already successed making a telnet to 587 port like it :
[Code]....
I have installed Net-SNMP.It is binded to port udp 161I start it with the command: snmpd -Lo
when I do snmpget -v 1 -c public localhost system.sysObjectID.0on the same machine the snmpd is running on- I get a respond SNMPv2-MIB::sysObjectID.0 = OID: ccitt.1when I send same request from another machine (using SNMPc program) - I see no reaction.I used "wireshark" to monitor packets, and I see the requests sent from the other machine. I also see them get to the first machine.
I want to add a few linux server to our monitoring system (solarwinds).
We have to get this information by snmp.The items we need are:
1-In Byte Transferred on every network interface
2-Out Byte Transferred on every network interface.
3-Memory Usage
4-Memory Free
5-CPU usage
6-Free Disk space on partiotion
7-Uptime
I could not find snmp OID or names for this object to fetch.
I've got a new install of the following...
[root@big-bad-joe /]# more /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 7)
------------------------------------------------------------------
[code]....
I just installed a fresh copy of RHEL 5.4 64-bit on a new machine, taking default configuration during the setup process. Then I realized we need to install SNMP on it. I found the following packages on the RHEL DVD and tried to install them, using both the Red Hat GUI for package installation and also through the command "rpm -i {package_name.rpm}". But I am getting dependency errors. The dependent components are not found on the DVD even though I have it inserted in the drive. Can someone advise how I can add SNMP to an existing RHEL machine?
Packages I tried to add:
net-snmp-5.3.2.2-7.el5.x86_64.rpm
net-snmp-devel-5.3.2.2-7.el5.x86_64.rpm
net-snmp-libs-5.3.2.2-7.el5.x86_64.rpm
net-snmp-perl-5.3.2.2-7.el5.x86_64.rpm
[Code]....
For RHEL 5 when I do a: snmpd -v I get:
NET-SNMP version: 5.3.2.2
Web: http://www.net-snmp.org/
Email: net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
How do I determine if it's SNMPv3?
i want if a port (exp. 1001) have 20 connections that the next new connection forword to an other port (exp. 1002).
View 2 Replies View RelatedVERY new to linux, erm but I have an issue that needs solving!I recently moved to university, where their network blocks sftp port 22, this means that I cannot connect to my FTP server which is running a version of linux.Now I've got this ftp server connected to a seedbox and it was created using the following walk through..Code:I have written this guide for a friend, but I though it would be useful for others as well.
There are several guides floating around, but I found that most always cock up in some way. This one is tried and tested to work on Debian Etch (on an OVH rps, but should apply to most servers).If there is a new stable release of rtorrent/libtorrent then I will update this guide to show you how to update it (without reinstalling the whole server).
At the bottom there are also instructions to install ftp access & some network monitoring software.Basically, I would really like someone to be able to construct the commands on how to change the listen port for sftp connection on linux or add another port to the list that Linux would use so that I could put in through putty.
I tried to make "ssh tunneling", but failed and got this message.
Quote:
Administrator@windstory-PC /
$ ssh -R 7869:localhost:7869 windowsstudy@192.168.0.4
windowsstudy@192.168.0.4's password:
Warning: remote port forwarding failed for listen port 7869 Last login: Wed Jul 21 01:56:04 2010 from 192.168.0.2 -bash-3.2$
1. system environment
192.168.0.2 - windows 7 + copssh
192.168.0.4 - centos 5.4 x86 + openssh
2. Guide for setting "ssh tunneling"
[URL]
3. Added this to sshd.conf
Quote:
AllowTcpForwarding yes
4. "netstat -na|grep 7869" at 192.168.0.4
Quote:
[root:maestro:~]# netstat -na|grep 7869
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:7869 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:7869 127.0.0.1:53539 ESTABLISHED
[code]....
5. result of "ssh -vvv -R 7869:localhost:7869 windowsstudy@192.168.0.4"
Quote:
debug3: authmethod_lookup password
debug3: remaining preferred: ,password
debug3: authmethod_is_enabled password
[code]....
6. I added 7869 for telnet service as follow;
Quote:
mytelnet 7869/tcp # My Telnet server
sudo ssh -L 750:192.168.123.103:873 username@192.168.123.103It does exactly what it's supposed to do, but how do i edit / remove this rule?Is there some config file where i can alter the forwarding? How does it get stored?Im using Ubuntu 10.10Server Edition (allthough i recon it would be pretty much the same across all versions
View 5 Replies View RelatedIs there any way to verify if packets being trafficked over a certain port are valid for the service you want to use this port for?
One obvious example that probably clarifies my question:
When I open port 443 (outgoing or incoming) for https/ssl traffic, I don't want this port to be used for say openvpn traffic.
Thus: when someone wants to surf to a website with https, it should be ok but if someone wants to connect to his home openvpn server over that same port, it should be blocked.
I'm not that great with mailservers, and just been thrown a curveball with a MS Exchange environment for which there is apparently no solution... yeah, right. But is there a workaround?
The problem is that the site mail (SMTP) needs to be sent via port 26 instead of the commonly used 25. Port 25 is mapped to a mailfilter, which apparently causes havoc with some of the mail, and the techs that have been on site trying to coax the Exchange server to co-operate have said that the only way would be to get rid of the filter.
The problem is that there are number of apps that are unable to have the outgoing port changed and so keep sending mail out on port 25.
I look after the Unix/Linux side of things at work, and I was wondering if there was an easy way to set up a Ubuntu box to receive mail on port 25 and just forward it to the MS box on port 26? So, in other words (and I hope this makes sense): monitor port 25, and forward whatever comes in on port 25 to the server on port 26. Simple portforwarding, or is it? What steps do I need to take?
When I use the following command:
ssh user@ssh_server -L 5500:localhost:5500 -p 22
everything works fine. I can log in, and local port forwarding is done. Otherwise when I use the command:
ssh user@ssh_server -R 5500:localhost:5500 -p 22
I get an error "remote port forwarding failed for listen port 5500". However when I try remote port forwarding in WinXP by use of putty there is no problem...
I'm trying to use iptables in order to forward all the incoming packets for port 5555 to port 5556 on the same server (192.168.2.101).
I wrote the following commands:
iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -i any -p tcp --dport 5555 -j DNAT --to 192.168.2.101:5556
iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -m state --state NEW -d 192.168.2.101 --dport 5556 -j ACCEPT
I'm trying to set rxtxSerial to work so a Java app has access to a serial port (via SiLabs CP210x driver, port /dev/ttyUSB0). When I use update-alternatives --config java, there are 3 alternatives which provide `java'. I have tried openJDK and Sun. Both fail but with completely different messages.
[Code].....
In SuSE firewall0. I do have a openSuse 11.4 and multiple IP addresses on eth0 interface
I run (trying to/have to) multiple TOMCAT servers.
I am trying to have each tomcat instance listen to on separate IP address for example:
What i am trying to do is to redirect
a) tomcat 1 -
a) tomcat 2 -
And so on.
I know that it has to be possible.
I do have just eth0/
Is is it possible. Do I have to create "vittual interfaces"? eth0:1, .......... and do redirection ?
"Server" has got just single interface - just 1 ethernet calbe goes to that server. I am planning to have 10-15 tomcat's on that server (I have to unfortunatley) and each has to run on port 80
Is it possible to "grant" permissions to normal users to run app on port 80 - that would solve me lots of problems if impossible to redirect.
I tried to setcap 'cap_net_bind_service=+ep' /path/to/tomcat ...... but no luck
i am running ncat (netcat's new version from nmap) on centos . I am listening on different ports. My question is , is it possible that when a connection is received on a port say 123, i redirect this connection to a different port and use the 123 port again for listening connections. ncat has an option -k which u can add with -l , it will force fully listen on the port. It can accept multiple connections on a single port but i want that once a client connects on to 123 port, he is forwarded to some other port and no longer on 123.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI'm using a Debian servers, as router/firwall.. I've two ethernet interfaces into the server, one for wan and one for lan. The i use SNAT so my LAN clients can access the internet throgh the debian router. That is working... Now i want to be able to access servers on the LAN site from the WAN site, and i wanna use port address translation (PAT). I have a FTP server running on a lan server, so i'm trying to portward port 21.
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i eth1 -d (WANIP) --dport 21 -j DNAT --to 192.168.1.2:21
When people try to access my FTP from the WAN site, they are redirected to the local FTP server, and they are promted for crendentials, but when the credentials are typed, and the local ftp server should answer the wan request, the connections dies.
The wan clients are being promted for credentials, so they are redirected to the local lan server, but after that the connections dies, so i think there is some kind of nat problem, when the local lan server is trying to respond to the wan request..
Here i my iptables script:
#flush table
iptables -F
#input regler
[code]....
I make an application on GNU/Linux which listening on a MULTICAST stream, so I open my unconnected socket, bind it on a MULTICAST address and a port, join the multicast group with the "setsockopt (IP_ADD_MEMBERSHIP)", then I receive datagram on my socket.
Now I've two different instances of the same application that run with their own MULTICAST address and port. And what I found strange is that, after a misconfiguration, I switch the ports, for example:
Emitting on 225.0.0.1/23451 and 225.0.0.2/23452
Receiving on 225.0.0.1/23452 and 225.0.0.2/23451
And my receiving part doesn't care about the MULTICAST address, it looks like the socket is listening on the port number only! I mean that the receiver [225.0.0.1/23452] take its datagrams from emitter [225.0.0.2/23452] and vice-versa!
I'll explain this in one sentence: Is it possible to program a port-binding shellcode in which people across the Internet can connect to, without being thwarted by the router blocking their data because the port its bound to doesn't allow port-forwarding
View 2 Replies View RelatedIf I forward port 80 to port 3128 for squid with an iptable rule, does port 3128 have to be open on the firewall or is this all routed behind the firewall?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI'm configuring a server for Zenoss monitoring over SNMP, but the SNMP process is running on 127.0.0.1:161 instead of 0.0.0.0:161, according to "netstat -an | grep -i udp".
Not sure why this is happening, but Zenoss reports that SNMP is not running due to this. My snmpd.conf file is the same as all of the other servers that are running SNMP, but this is the first Debian server I've tried to add (the other's are CentOS).
I have a favor to ask, I've been having a really hard time trying to understand how snmp traps work, what can they do for you, and why they are useful. I've done some research and I've even set up snmp clients on linux systems, not necessarily the traps. I know they communicate on port 161 and 162 and I also know that you set them up to connect to a community string. Still I cant grasp the concept. If you don't mind can any one break it down for me, in very basic terms.
View 7 Replies View Relatedam not able to install snmp in ubuntu, this is the code i followed from ....., "apt-get update and then apt-get install snmpd. the problem occurs is "could not resolve sg.security.com" and i cant updates using update manager.
View 4 Replies View Related