Server :: Mdadm Continually Accessing Raid Device
Dec 4, 2010
I have an Linksys NSLU2 with four usb harddrives attached to it. One is for the os, the other three are setup as a RAID5 array. Yes, I know the raid will be slow, but the server is only for storage and will realistically get accessed once or twice a week at the most. I want the drives to spin down but mdadm is doing something in the background to access them. An lsof on the raid device returns nothing at all. The drive are blinking non-stop and never spin down until I stop the raid. Then they all spin down nicely after the appropriate time.
They are Western Digital My Book Essentials and will spin down by themselves if there is no access. What can I shutdown in mdadm to get it to stop continually accessing the drives? Is it the sync mechanism in the software raid that is doing this? I tried setting the monitor to --scan -1 to get to check the device just once, but to no avail. I even went back and formatted the raid with ext2 thinking maybe the journaling had something to do with it. There are no files on the raid device, it's empty.
View 12 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Dec 16, 2009
Got a little problem after the install of Fedora 12. First there was not problem in opening the raid-device, after i tryed to automount it with crypttab and fstab im not longer able to open it.
Here some outputs code...
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 25, 2011
I'm having trouble with Ubuntu 10.10 and stable device names. When I installed Ubuntu, the root drive was the only one in the machine; it obviously got /dev/sda.
After the base installation, I installed three additional 2TB drives to make RAID-5 array. Ubuntu renamed the root drive to /dev/sdd. While annoying I lived with it.
After creating a single partition set to "Linux raid autodetect" on each drive, I created the RAID-5 array:
Code:
All was going well until a reboot. When rebooting Ubuntu decided to make the root drive /dev/sda this time and now mdadm --detail /dev/md0 reports:
Code:
How to fix the array and make the device names stable?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 5, 2011
I am trying to create a new mdadm RAID 5 device /dev/md0 across three disks where such an array previously existed, but whenever I do it never recovers properly and tells me that I have a faulty spare in my array. More-specific details below. I recently installed Ubuntu Server 10.10 on a new box with the intent of using it as a NAS sorta-thing. I have 3 HDDs (2 TB each) and was hoping to use most of the available disk space as a RAID5 mdadm device (which gives me a bit less than 4TB.)
I configured /dev/md0 during OS installation across three partitions on the three disks - /dev/sda5, /dev/sdb5 and /dev/sdc5, which are all identical sizes. The OS, swap partition etc. are all on /dev/sda. Everything worked fine, and I was able to format the device as ext4 and mount it. Good so far.
Then I thought I should simulate a failure before I started keeping important stuff on the RAID array - no point having RAID 5 if it doesn't provide some redundancy that I actually know how to use, right? So I unplugged one of my drives, booted up, and was able to mount the device in a degraded state; test data I had put on there was still fine. Great. My trouble began when I plugged the third drive back in and re-booted. I re-added the removed drive to /dev/md0 and recovery began; things would look something like this:
Code:
user@guybrush:~$ cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [raid10]
md0 : active raid5 sdc5[3] sdb5[1] sda5[0]
3779096448 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [3/2] [UU_]
[Code]...
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jan 16, 2010
I am trying to set up a mdadm raid in a new PC that I am building for home theatre. the machine boot just fine from /dev/sdc running ubuntu 9.10 However in gparted /dev/sda and dev/sdb show to be part of /devmapper/sil_ajbicfacbaej Both dev/sda and /dev/sdb were drives that used to be part of a sil hardware raid on a previous machine. I would like to use them as a new mdadm raid on this new machine the old hardware card was really quite slow. the drives are now pluged into the MB and should bw much faster there.
fdisk -l shows this
*********************************************** ~$ sudo fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 1500.3 GB, 1500301910016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 182401 cylinders
[code]....
View 6 Replies
View Related
Feb 20, 2011
My only goal is to have a raid-5 that auto-assembles and auto-mounts. Hardware: 4*2TB sata (raid disks), 1*500GB IDE (OS disk), 1*DVD IDE all plugged direct into the motherboard (nForce 750i SLI).
Starting partitions on the raid disks: gpt ext4 The problem occurs when I restart my comp after building it for the first time. I am able to see it assemble, I am able to partition it, I even mounted it Once.This is the second time I've built it so I have watched everything that happened. I don't know if this has anything to do with my problem, but when I created the raid my drive designations were: sda - 500GB(OS), sd[bcde] - 2TB(raid). When I restarted: sd[abcd] - 2TB(raid), sde - 500GB(OS).
[Code]...
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 1, 2011
My home-backup server, with 8*2TB disks won't boot anymore. Two disks failed at the same time and i rebuilt the raid 6 array without any problem, but now i can't boot the os. I'm using ubuntu server, 10.10. I've made screens of the displays to don't copy everything here. The problem at the boot:
And the Grub config: It's not a production server, but i would like to have it online. I've tried for the lasts 2 days (just a couple hours a day) but without success. I was suggested to do "mount -o remount,rw /" and than edit /etc/fstab, but it get the file don't exist error.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 21, 2010
I have been having some odd issues over the last day or so while trying to get a raid 5 array running in software under Kubuntu. I installed 3 1TB drives and started up, my sd* order got all messed up( sda was now sdc and so on). This wasn't entirely unexpected, so I fixed up fstab and booted again. I found all three of the drives I installed, set them to raid auto-detect and used mdadm to create /dev/md0. I then created mdadm.conf by piping the output of mdadm --detail --scan --verbose into /etc/mdadm.conf.At this point, everything was still going swimmingly. I copied over a few hundred GB of data from another failing drive and everything seemed ok. I went to reboot once the copy was done and everything just went weird. All of the sd* drives went back to the original. Of course, this meant that the mdadm.conf was wrong. I tried to just change the device list, but that didn't work. I then deleted mdadm.conf and rebooted. The drive list stayed in the original order this time, so I just tried manually starting the array.
By erasing the partition table of the 3rd drive, I've been able to get it to the status of spare, but it says it is busy when I try to add it to the array. A grep through dmesg makes me think that md has a lock on it. I'm not sure where to go with it now. If anyone has any pointers, I would like to hear them.
Device List(original):
/dev/sda => boot drive, /home /
/dev/sdb => 1.5TB media storage, failing
[code]...
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 16, 2009
mdadm --create /dev/md1 --level=1 --raid-disks=2 missing /dev/sdb1and I getmd1: raid array is not clean -- starting background reconstructionWhy is it not clean?Should I be worried?The HD is not new it has been used in before in a raid array but has beenrepartitionated.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 7, 2011
I have 4 WD10EARS drives running in a RAID 5 array using MDADM.Yesterday my OS Drive failed. I have replaced this and installed a fresh copy of Ubuntu 11.04 on it. then installed MDADM, and rebooted the machine, hoping that it would automatically rebuild the array.It hasnt, when i look at the array using Disk Utility, it says that the array is not running. If i try to start the array it says :Error assembling array: mdadm exited with exit code 1: mdadm: failed to RUN_ARRAY /dev/md0: Input/output error
mdadm: Not enough devices to start the array.I have tried MDADM --assemble --scan and it gives this output:mdadm: /dev/md0 assembled from 2 drives - not enough to start the array.I know that there are 4 drives present as they are all showing, but it is only using 2 of them.I also ran MDADM -- detail /dev.md0 which gave:
root@warren-P5K-E:~# mdadm --detail /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
Version : 0.90
[code]...
View 11 Replies
View Related
Feb 3, 2011
When we assemble a raid array, from where does it load configuration information for that array? I thought it refers to /etc/mdadm.conf file, but in my system, mdadm.conf file doesn't even contain all information. Still it is able to successfully assemble previously created device.
# cat /etc/mdadm.conf
DEVICE /dev/sd[bcdjkl]1
DEVICE /dev/loop[012345]
[code]...
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 27, 2011
I have a raid 5 array that appears to have died. I was just routinely looking at /var/log/messages and noticed that a drive in the array was complaining (via SMARTD).
This is the /home directory, and so is backed up, so it's not critical, but I'd like to get some things that changed after the last backup (the week before I noticed the failure)
Let me start by outlining what I know :
It's a 2TB array spread over three disks (mdadm software RAID5), here are the drives:
MDADM gives the drives :
Now, the array *WAS* up ok, but I umounted it. (in which /dev/md0 was mounted to /home) Yes,I know - I didn't want any changes being made to the array by anything - at least that was my thinking at the time. In hindsight... I would have killed any processes, locked out the server, backed up again and 'then' unmounted it.
But we are where we are, I'm sure there'll be time for recriminations later.
When I try to remount it, I get :
Ok - looks like it's lost the type - it's normally worked, maybe we'll give it a little hint - it's ext3 with a journal.
When I tell it it's an ext3, I get :
Now, before I go charging off specifying superblocks further along the disk, but I can't remember where they're stored.
Neither can I recall what the blocksize I originally created the array as (I have a feeling I specifed 4K, but I could be wrong).
debugfs is only telling me :
I should also point out that this server is hosted, so it's 150 miles away from me at the moment, so I can't just whip them out and dd a copy.
View 11 Replies
View Related
Oct 27, 2010
We have some servers that run in very harsh environments (research vessel) that need to have high-availability.We have software RAID 1 for some measure of resiliency, along with proper data backups (tapes etc), however we would like to be able to break out a new server and re-image it (including RAID setup) from a known good copy if the hardware completely fails on the production box. Simplicity of the process is a big plus.I am interested in any advice on the best way to approach this. My current approach (relatively new to Linux administration, totally new to MDADM) is to use DD to take a complete gzipped copy of one of the RAID'ed devices (from a live CD): ode:
dd if=/dev/sda bs=4096 | gzip -c > /mnt/external/image/test.img then reverse the process on the new PC, finally using Code:mdadm --assemble to re-create and re-build the array.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 24, 2011
Its from a Synology Box with 3 disks, which one is damaged. But this disk wasnt in use.Take a look on the raid-size of 493 GB - and the both available disks with 250GB..)
On the others there were a linear raid. during this damaged disk the synology-device tells me, that the volume was crashed.But it look like, that this disk was not mounted into this volume.Quote:
DiskStation> mdadm --detail /dev/md2
/dev/md2:
Version : 00.90
[code]....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 30, 2010
I am learning software raid 1 with centos 5.5. I created the raid with out any problems and removed the first drive to check there was no problems and it booted. I have installed the old drive back in the system as hdc and need to resync the drives (used old drive as partitions correct) I thought I could use raidhotadd but id does not seem to exist anymore. how I resync the drives in the array hda primary and hdc secondary using mdadm
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 20, 2011
This is message I get when I try and start itmdadm: /dev/md0 assembled from 2 drives - not enough to start the arrayBelow is the information I've collected about any help on how I can get the raid back up and going to I can get the data off of it would be awesome
sudo mdadm --examine --scan -v
ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid10 num-devices=4 UUID=91c36708:a7cbb532:5b51dc92:ba008491
devices=/dev/sdd1,/dev/sdc1,/dev/sdb1,/dev/sda1
[code]...
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 18, 2011
I have a raid5 on 10 disk, 750gb and it have worked fine with grub for a long time with ubuntu 10.04 lts. A couple of days ago I added a disk to the raid, growd it and then resized it.. BUT, I started the resize-process on a terminal on another computer, and after some time my girlfriend powered down that computer!
So the resize process cancelled in the middle and i couldn't acess any of the HDDs so I rebooted the server.
Now the problem, the system is not booting up, simple black with a blinking line. Used a rescue CD to boot it up, finised the resize-process and the raid seems to be working fine so I tried to boot normal again. Same problem. Rescue cd, updated grub, got several errors: error: unsupported RAID version: 0.91. I have tried to purge grub, grub-pc, grub commmon, removed /boot/grub and installed grub again. Same problem.
I have tried to erased mbr (# dd if=/dev/null of=/dev/sdX bs=446 count=1) on sda (ide disk, system), sdb (sata, new raid disk). Same problem. Removed and reinstalled ubuntu 11.04 and is now getting error: no such device: (hdd id). Again tried to reinstall grub on both sda and sdb, no luck. update-grub is still generating error about raid id 0.91 and is back on a blinking line on normal boot. When you'r resizeing a raid MDADM changed the ID from 0.90 to 0.91 to prevent something that happend happened. But since I have completed the resize-process MDADM have indeed changed the ID back to 0.90 on all disks.
I have also tried to follow a howto on a similar problem with a patch on [URL] But I cant compile, various error about dpkg. So my problem is, I cant get grub to work. It just gives me a blinking line and unsupported RAID version: 0.91.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 26, 2010
I installed mdadm fine and all and proceeded to run:mdadm --create --verbose /dev/md0 --level=stripe --raid-devices=2 /dev/sda /dev/sdbWith sda being my primary hard drive, and sdb being the secondary.I get this error message upon running the command"mdadm: chunk size defaults to 64Kmdadm: Cannot open /dev/sda: Device or resource busymdadm: create aborted"I don't know what's wrong!
mdstat says:
"Personalities : [linear] [raid0] [raid1] [raid10] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [multipath] [faulty]
unused devices: <none>"
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 11, 2011
I rebooted my server and out of nowhere the RAID5 array won't assemble. I've tried everything I could think of to reassemble the thing. I fear that the array is ruined, but I can't imagine how. Here are various bits of information: The simplest failure (with and without partition numbers, which have not been needed in the past):
Code:
richard@nas:~$ sudo mdadm --assemble --verbose /dev/md0 /dev/sd[bcd]
mdadm: looking for devices for /dev/md0
mdadm: cannot open device /dev/sdb: Device or resource busy
[code]...
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 11, 2010
I am planning on setting up a 4x1TB RAID5 with mdadm under Ubuntu 9.10. I tried installing mdadm using "sudo apt-get install mdadm", all worked fine except for the following error: Code: Generating array device nodes... /var/lib/dpkg/info/mdadm.postinst: 170: /dev/MAKEDEV: not found failed. The end result is the /dev/md0 device has not been created, as can be seen here:
Code: windsok@beer:~$ mdadm --detail /dev/md0 mdadm: cannot open /dev/md0: No such file or directory After googling, I found the following bug which describes the issue: [URL] However it was reported way back in April 2009, and it does not look like it will be fixed any time soon, so I was wondering if anyone knows a workaround for this bug, to get me up and running?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 11, 2010
I have a desktop server set up with 3 x 1Tb disks set up in a number of partitions. Some are under RAID 1, others under RAID 5. eg:
Code:
md0 : active raid1 sdc2[2](S) sdb2[1] sda2[0]
513984 blocks [2/2] [UU]
[code]....
View 6 Replies
View Related
Aug 20, 2009
In a nutshell, our RAID 1 array was rendered broken and we were advised that core lib files were missing and the OS needed to be reloaded... a quote from our server host:"The OS is not healthy.This server will need a reinstall.
Libs are missing." This was after having replaced what we though was a faulty /dev/sdb. So they reloaded the OS (Debian 5.0.2 x86_64) on 2 FRESH drives, and installed the old /dev/sda as /dev/sdc once the reload was completed. Here's the output of /etc/fstab on the fresh install so we know what we're working with:
Code:
debian:/BAK# cat /etc/fstab
# /etc/fstab: static file system information.
#
# <file system> <mount point> <type> <options> <dump> <pass>
[code]....
The one problem I see myself running into is /dev/md1 and /dev/md2 are currently in use by the new system, so I cannot mount it there. I should also note, reloading the OS is a viable option if needed as we haven't started configuring the server yet. So if we need to reinstall the OS and assign the NEW RAID arrays to something other than /dev/md1 and /dev/md2 then we can do that.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 9, 2009
Alternate Heading: Unable to use opensuse partitioner to fully format a Seagate 1Tb drive OK. Swapped over a motherboard to increase the number of slots available for hard drives so that I could expand my raid array (4 X 1Tb drives). Discovered I had no thermal paste so all delayed for 24 hours while I bought some, miscalculated on rebuild and had to reinstall OpenSuse but in the end system is now up and running. Unfortunately when I formatted my new 1Tb drive (Seagate) it formats to 931.50 Gb while the other 4 drives formatted to 931.51 Gb (they are WD). I'm now in the position that when I try to add this new drive I get :
mdadm: /dev/sdc1 not large enough to join array
Is there any way I can resize the existing devices down to 931.50 Gb so that I can add in the new drive without having to restore the array?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 11, 2010
I'm writing a monitoring plugin for a home server RAID, mdadm on Ubuntu 10.4. code...
I'm looking for the possible values of "state" but can't seem to find it anywhere, neither man nor the online documentation I have found seem to have a list.
Does anyone know where to find a list of possible states?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 5, 2011
I have 4 WD10EARS drives running in a RAID 5 array using MDADM.Yesterday my OS Drive failed. I have replaced this and installed a fresh copy of Ubuntu 11.04 on it.I then installed MDADM, and rebooted the machine, hoping that it would automatically rebuild the array.It hasnt, when i look at the array using Disk Utility, it says that the array is not running. If i try to start the array it says : Error assembling array: mdadm exited with exit code 1: mdadm: failed to RUN_ARRAY /dev/md0: Input/output errormdadm: Notenough devices to start the array.I have tried MDADM --assemble --scan and it gives this output:mdadm: /dev/md0 assembled from 2 drives - not enough to start the array.I know that there are 4 drives present as they are all showing, but it is only using 2 of them.I also ran MDADM -- detail /dev.md0 which gave:
root@warren-P5K-E:~# mdadm --detail /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
Version : 0.90
[code]....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 10, 2010
I have done lots of searching and I haven't been able to find anyone else with the same problem. Whenever I create a RAID with 'mdadm', regardless of level (I've done linear, 0, and 5) the command I use is:
Code:
mdadm --create --run --verbose /dev/md0 --raid-devices=11 --spare-devices=1 --chunk=256 --level=5 /dev/sd[abcdefghijkl]1
The RAID is build RAID 5 as it should be. However, when I check /proc/partitions it shows under "md3".
[Code]...
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 21, 2010
I have a previously defined RAID5 (4 disks). This worked in Ubuntu 8.04.. I recently moved to CentOS5.. and I cannot seen to get the drive back online.cat /proc/mdstat shows, no raid levels (personalities).. and no drives listed.mdadm --detail -scan returns nothing.mdadm --QE returned a UUID string.. and the ARRAY output.I can mdadm --examine all the members of the original array.I am not versed in mdadm enough to really understand what I can run and should not run that would erase the data on the drives. Please assist.. I will try to post exact output of commands.. but the system is kind of unreachable and being rebuilt... i just want to ensure my data on the array is not lost
View 7 Replies
View Related
Feb 26, 2010
Greetings Fellow Knights Of The Penguin Clan....!I am having issues with device mapper seeing a 275GB Raid5 Lun from my SAN storage.I'm using IBM 2145 San Volume Controller.I am able to see a 40 GB Raid 10 device though..
########################################################################
fdisk -l |grep 'dm-*'
Disk /dev/dm-6: 42.9 GB, 42949672960 bytes
[code]....
View 22 Replies
View Related
Aug 14, 2010
I'm running a Debian homeserver, with a 3-disk (1GB each) raid 5 array using mdadm (the OS is on a separate disk).Now, smartmontools noticed some bad sectors on one of the disks, and I'm not sure what to do next (except for backup of valuable data).I found some articles on how to fix these sectors, but I'm unaware what the result on the whole array will be.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 21, 2010
I HAD a fedora 11 server with md RAID 1 across two 1TB SATA drives. The md0 space was set up to be an LVM PV and the single LVM VG was carved up into 5 or 6 LVs. The MB on this system died and I wound up buying a new one.
Now I want to recover the data from the RAID1 setup on the new server. However, when I attach the two 1TB drives to a new fedora 13 setup, mdadm is only able to find one of the two drives. The partition on the second drive shows "busy" during an mdadm -A -s -v to scan for md volumes.
Well, one drive should be enough since this is RAID1, right? Well, when I do a pvscan -v, the other drive shows up as a "NEW" pv not allocated to a VG. In addition, vgscan does print "Invalid metadata header checksum" when it runs but it doesn't point at any particular PV. I'm afraid to go any further with LVM since I can't afford to lose the data on this system. It is backed up offsite, but the restore will take several days and I can't afford to be down that long.
Are there any tools or techniques where I can dig deeper into what each drive, in the RAID1 pair, has right and wrong with it and pick one that I can force into a usable VG so that I can recover the data?
View 2 Replies
View Related
