Security :: "Outbound" Messages And Checksecurity.log Setuid Changes
Aug 11, 2010
I am using ubuntu 10.04 on an iMac 7.1. What do the following log entries mean? I recently had a "sbin/init infected" alarm with chkrootkit (or rkhunter, I forget which) and reinstalled, and I thought I was rid of the problem, whatever it was (could have been a kernel panic), but now the checksecurity setuid stuff reappeared (the checksecurity.log only appears in the log file viewer after resetting it with gconftool-2 --recursive-unset /apps/gnome-system-log, which seems suspicious; why is the log hidden by default?); also there are "outbound" messages that I don't understand. I have another ubuntu install on another Mac which seems to be unaffected (and also has checksecurity installed; I just ran it manually and also got setuid stuff, but there is no "outbound" and ufw.log is empty). I can't really think I have a rootkit (I don't notice any effects except these anomalous logfiles, and my browsing habits don't include sleazy websites). And what exactly are bound sockets? There is a lot of information about sockets on the net but it's all rather technical. I continue to look of course. I ran chkrootkit and rkhunter again, and they read clean (if I can trust them).
Is it possible that the trouble is related to the Mac's BIOS emulation? (Apple does not seem to take security very seriously; Snow Leopard does not even ask for a password for Software Update - I asked my premium reseller and he confirmed it. I should not be surprised to find out that the iMac's BIOS emulation is unsafe. I'll need to get a real computer). The MacBook Pro 5.1 has a newer firmware (for instance, it will boot ubuntu from external disks which the iMac will not), and as I said that install seems to be unaffected (The setuid stuff is probably normal, but I'm not sure the "outbound" messages are). I use grub legacy, which seems to install to the Mac's EFI partition as /dev/sda (GParted shows 18.1 MB of 200MB used on both computers with ubuntu on them, whereas an HFS+ disk without ubuntu, or with GRUB in a partition, will show 3.09 MB used).
Does it make sense to reconfigure checksecurity to check for setuid changes daily (change CHECK_WEEKLY="SETUID" in /etc/checksecurity.conf to CHECK_DAILY="SETUID")?
checksecurity.log:
messages (part):
There also was a lot of terminal output similar to the iMac's which I forgot to save, and when I ran checksecurity again it was blank. (Incidentally, the list of setuid programs on Mac OS is a lot longer)
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Nov 18, 2010
According to Security standards given in[URL]Quote:Unless otherwise approved the following setuid root binaries are the only ones allowed on production servers:
* /bin/su
* /usr/bin/sudo
* /usr/bin/passwd
[code]....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 15, 2010
It is known that binaries with the SetUID bit enabled are a threat for the system.I saw on this ArchLinux wiki[URL].tead_Of_Setuida way to limit the use of SetUID bit thanks to POSIX capabilities.It looks very interesting.Does anyone of you used it already?Is it a burden for the system afterwards (like binaries not working, needing to be fixed); or is it seamless
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 2, 2011
I'm having an issue where a server in CA (1000/full) and in VA (100/full) have very lopsided data transfer.
CA -> VA with iperf shows ~20Mbps
VA -> CA with iperf shows ~93Mbps
If we change the CA server to 100/FULL, transfer speed is 93Mbps both ways.
Some tuning was done to TCP window scaling parameters, but it won't correct the issue, just improve the CA -> VA numbers to what is listed above. I will say, turning TCP window scaling OFF will lower the transfer speed both ways to < 20Mbps.
The only clue I have when looking at wireshark dumps is that the window scale going OUT would never go past 10240 (scale is 8, so 2^8 x 40bytes). In the opposite direction, the window size will go above 3MB (scaled).
It is not a bandwidth problem as iperf with UDP shows 93Mbps both ways. Local transfers (CA 1000/full to CA 100/full) show full speed both ways, so I feel it is strictly related to TCP window scaling.
RedHat 5 64-bit on both sides. Any ideas why it won't scale above 10240?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Apr 15, 2011
I understand the difference between Reject vs Drop for incoming traffic, but are there any differences between reject and drop for Outbound Traffic? Are there reasons to pick one over the other or are they functionally identical when talking about Outbound traffic?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2011
What should I do to keep important files on my computer from being uploaded to the internet? Don't I need an outbound firewall to prevent this?
What causes my computer to send an outbound request to the internet that would result in files being uploaded from my computer onto the internet? I'm afraid to put anything of importance (like reports that I've written for work) onto a computer with internet access because I don't want them to be uploaded to the internet. I wouldn't upload them on purpose obviously, but I'm afraid it would happen without my knowledge because I don't know what I'm doing.
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 25, 2011
Tried google and searching this forum to no avail. Under Fedora 14, there is an selinux policy which blocks sshd from making outbound connections on port 80 or 443. This can occur when a client box tries to tunnel through the ssh connection for encrypted access to the web.
While I did manage to allow this happen by creating a permissive domain for sshd with this command:
Code:
The preferred way would be to allow sshd to make connection on other ports with a similar command that does not seem to work:
Code:
Is this the correct way of allowing an outbound port connection for the sshd daemon?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 18, 2010
Using Windows, I always set a Restrictive firewall policy with a third party firewall. But I also had all ports set to Stealth, something that appears to not offer any security benefits (as I've learned from reading Ubuntu forums). I'd like to learn about best security practices (under Ubuntu) for outgoing firewall protection. I will be using the built-in Ubuntu firewall that is configured via Firestarter. Outgoing filtering offers privacy as well as security benefits. But I thought I needed my ports stealthed to be safe too, so I'm open to learning new things.
I wanted to start a poll to find out how many folks use permissive/restrictive, but no polls allowed here apparently.Could Ubuntu users knowledgeable about firewalls enlighten me on whether I should go Outbound-Restrictive and what applications I will need to allow so Ubuntu "housekeeping" is not affected negatively? I basically just use the internet for software updates, web-surfing and e-mail. One question I have is whether there is something comparable in Ubuntu to Window's "DNS Client" service? I always disabled Window's "DNS Client" and forced each application to request port 53 DNS lookups itself.I only had to allow four programs to accomplish all internet traffic that I engage in. I set all other programs/applications to be either Blocked or to have to Ask for an outgoing connection as needed.Here is my former Windows XP setup:
svchost.exe: allow UDP for ports 53, 67, 68, 123 (time) and TCP for ports 80, 443
Avast: allow UDP for port 53 and TCP for port 80
firefox: allow UDP for port 53 and TCP for ports 80, 443
IE: allow UDP for port 53 and TCP for ports 80, 443
View 9 Replies
View Related
May 30, 2009
More than 7 G bytes were logged to the messages file last three weeks I got this message in /var/log/messages I want to stop this messaging cause it takes to much space
Quote:
Apr 30 20:25:18 TEST-NODE kernel: IPT: IN_NOMATCH IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:17:a4:a7:3d:a2:08:00 SRC=172.26.16.27 DST=172.26.16.255 LEN=104 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=10100 DPT=10100 LEN=84
[code]...
View 7 Replies
View Related
Dec 13, 2010
I have noticed some possible security issues in my /var/log.messages log but i'm not sure how to read the messages.
I'm getting the following lines:
Code:
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 11, 2011
My /var/log/messages file is being flooded by messages like these.
Code:
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 12, 2011
Suddenly, I'm getting lots of messages in my CentOS 5.6 secure log : -
May 12 13:07:49 CentOS55 webmin[14538]: Successful login as root from 192.168.0.203
May 12 13:10:03 CentOS55 userhelper[14698]: pam_timestamp(system-config-securitylevel:session): updated timestamp file `/var/run/sudo/root/unknown'
[code]....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 3, 2010
Is there a way to send syslog messages through SNMP? I'm not finding much info online around this. A co-worker said it was easy to do. RHEL5.5
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 18, 2010
I am newbie in Linux using Mint 9 Isadora. I am flooded with UFW messages. I would like to how to interpret these messages. I am a bit scared..
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 29, 2011
I have my system set up to where the router(dd-wrt) will send it's syslog messages to my Linux PC system. I am using shorewall as my firewall. I have two questions: How can I configure shorewall to allow the messages from my router? If I use my router IP address to allow the messages to come through the firewall, will this be a great security risk as anything from the internet can come through on that router ipaddress?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 24, 2010
setuid bit allows the process to execute the file with the uid of the file. But, what is the purpose of setting setuid without execute bit? The man page tells that if a file is setuid without execute flag, the permission will be displayed as 'S' (capital s) in ls command. Why should anyone set the setuid without execute flag? Does setting setuid without execute flag have any special meaning?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 18, 2010
I have a root process (on linux) that forks a child and the child process then drops privileges by doing a setuid() to a normal user. After the child setuid()'s, it is of course impossible for it to gain root again by itself. But since the main process is still running as root, i was wondering if there was a simple/smart way of getting the root-master-process to elevate the child back to root (or maybe just to another non-privi uid). Is there some way to do a setuid() on another pid? or maybe something can be done through /proc/<pid>/? Killing the child is not an option (because its what it does today and im trying to find a smarter way). (The program is apache2's mpm-itk worker and the "child" is the actual apache2 process serving a page.)
View 11 Replies
View Related
Mar 8, 2010
I have a batch job which logs in to the server every 10 minutes via windows rsh. The job checks to see is there are any files that need to be send via a EDI serverto a supplier.The following logwatch report is swamped with the login messages and would like to either suppress the logging in PAM? or suppress the entry in the logwatch report?But I still want logging id the username is not username1.Connections (secure-log) Begin rshd[1754]: pam_rhosts_auth(rsh:auth): allowed to username1@10.0.0.1 as myedi
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 2, 2010
I would like to give a non-root user (nicollet) the ability to detect and send a signal to processes started by Apache2 (those processes are FastCGI scripts and the signal tells them to empty their cache). The processes are owned by the web user (www-data), and I'm running on Debian unstable.
I can't find any way to have the nicollet user see those processes.
The processes are running and can see by both root and www-data:
root@linux-01:~# ps -Af | grep baryton
www-data 17649 17648 0 10:27 ? 00:00:00 baryton
www-data 28145 1 0 Nov01 ? 00:00:12 baryton --bot
root 18701 18700 0 10:46 pts/0 00:00:00 grep baryton
root@linux-01:~#
[Code]....
The most surprising is that the grep process is indeed run by www-data (because it's started from a setuid executable) and is visible, but the baryton process isn't.
What's going on here? Why can ps run by www-data show those processes, but ps run by a setuid executable running as www-data cannot, when it's started by nicollet?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 13, 2011
I have a syslog-ng running and kernel build of 2.6.34.8 I use a syslog API in my program with facility LOG_LOCAL5 and and levels debug err and crit and info. when I ran on the older syslog facility I had everything logged fine as I intended. now I have written these rules into the syslog-ng.conf:
options {
flush_lines (0);
time_reopen (10);
log_fifo_size (1000);
[code]....
the last two rules show my program gnssapp. the result is all debug levels or crit or err levels I don't see any of them !
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 8, 2009
I need to log outbound (server -> remote) ssh traffic, but am unsure of the best way to do this.
I added this to iptables, but nothing is being written to the logs when I ssh from the server to another system.
iptables -A OUTPUT -m state --state NEW -j LOG --log-uid iptables-save
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 14, 2011
Looking at the output of netstat, I'm not seeing a definitive way to tell which torrent connections are clients reaching in to my machine vs my machine reaching out to the world. Is there a clear way to determine which is which?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 7, 2010
I have internal-only email server that has internal BIND9 running. Thought it only has its IP address defined in /etc/resolv.conf, it is still resolving outside addresses.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 26, 2010
I have just built an internal postfix server for sending mail only, it's not accessible outside our network. I will be sending from our domain, Rewriting the from field to abc.com is turned on in the postfix config. A friend is telling me this will not work as they will do reverse lookups on our domain. What does this mean? Obviously the domain the email is sent from is a valid domain. If they do a lookup from the IP the mail came from it would be global crossing, our internet provider? These outbound emails are critical client reports, I want to make sure they are not seen as spam.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 24, 2011
I'm sending files to a remote server by way of FTP via a PHP script. With the firewall turned on these files are getting to the remote server with 0kb and the remote server is timing out before all the files are received. When the firewall is turned off the all files are received in tact. There are no outbound rules set in the iptables, looking for ideas on what to check next.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 21, 2010
(centos 5.5 86*64 with cpanel) I am trying to set up a php script.
The script requires an outbound connection to project honeypot and when I go to the honeypot.php on my server I get an error asking if outbound connections are disabled.
They could be...I am not sure where to check, I have checked csf and outbound tcp is allowed on port 80, but I am not sure if I should be looking somewhere else.
Obviously I dont want to make the server insecure, so I am wondering how I can allow this outbound connection.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 22, 2011
Is there a way I can count inbound/outbound mails for a particular user? I'm using sendmail as MTA and dovecot for POP3.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 19, 2009
I'm having a problem that seems to plague a lot of people judging from my research on the web. I have a hosting provider that limits the number of incoming connections to the shared host to 50 per IP.
I have a single IP for outbound connections and I use Squid as a proxy server.
Lately I've tripped across the 50 connection limit frequently - and that's with only 1 user. It seems the problem is related to the performance you can get out of a desktop these days. Its not impossible to have several browsers open with several connections to different sites on the same server - and boom - locked out!
So it occurred to me that there must be some way to limit the number of outbound connections in the kernel - but I've not found it. I did find that Microsoft had been limiting the number of outbound connections in XP to 10 to address the virus problem, and I've found countless hosting complaints and dialog on the subject with no easy solution.
So my question is simply, does anyone know how to limit the number of OUTBOUND connections to a single IP in the kernel?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 24, 2010
I wish to prevent some programs from "phoning home", and to allow other programs to access only specific web servers.Is there any way to interactively allow or decline outbound communication from individual programs on Ubuntu?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 17, 2010
Is there a way to configure my interface to promisc mode and also make it not capture the "transmitted" packets. ?I mean, i want the interface in Promisc mode but only for inbound traffic.If there isnt any using ifconfig, can it be by configuring eth0 to promisc using ifconfig , and filtering outbound traffic from being captured using sockets or something ?
View 4 Replies
View Related
