i am forced to do a iptable configuration and the requrements are it shuld get connection from our dubai server (2or 3 static ips) also get connection from local static ip all other networks shuld be blocked what is these prerouting,postrouting&forward chains. is i need to configure that?
View 3 RepliesI am unable to restore my iptables from iptables-save after upgrading Fedora. I cannot get iptables-restore to work, and I have resorted to entering rules manually using the GUI.
View 2 Replies View RelatedIPtables creates an error during startup as well as when I try to restart it: Here's the output of:
[Code]....
I am going to start studying IPTABLES for Linux Firewall. Can any one suggest me the best Book for IPTABLES contains everything of iptables.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am facing a strange problem witht my iptables as there are some firewall entries stored somewhere which is displaying the below firewall entries even after flushing the iptables & when I restart the iptables service then the firewall entries are again shown in my iptables as shown below,
[root@myhome ~]# iptables -L
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
[code]....
I recently installed a new Ubuntu PC that runs iptables and PSAD. I had the same script on another Ubuntu PC, but when I copied the script onto the new PC, I got this error. I don't remember where I found the tutorial for this, all I know is that this is the script (Edited for my usage):
Code:
#!/bin/bash
# Script to check important ports on remote webserver
# Copyright (c) 2009 blogama.org
# This script is licensed under GNU GPL version 2.0 or above
[code]....
Safe.txt contains:
Code:
127.0.0.1
192.168.1.8
192.168.1.1
98.200.58.73
192.168.0.1
And the error message generated is:
Code:
root@NETWORK-SERVER:/var/ddosprotect# ./ipblock.sh
' not found.4.4: host/network `127.0.0.1
Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more information.
' not found.4.4: host/network `192.168.1.8
[code]....
I am running Ubuntu server 10.10 and trying to setup iptables rules in /etc/if-up.d/iptables
Quote:
root@host# cat /etc/network/if-up.d/iptables
#!/bin/sh -e
iptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
Problem is that iptables doesn't get updated and I don't see them when iptables -L is executed after reboot.
To expand: I'm trying to set up a box with l7-filter, and I need to patch and compile iptables 1.4.1.1 as part of the process. I ./configured it with the prefix= argument so it would install into /sbin instead of /usr/sbin, and I did a yum remove iptables before installing it so as not to get in the way of the original iptables, but I'm wondering if this is really necessary - it's kind of annoying, because removing the original iptables removes the init.d script, deregisters the service, etc. If I don't, is it possible that iptables 1.4.1.1 might get overwritten in a system update or something, or will yum see that I've got a custom/newer version in there and leave it be?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have been struggling with this for a very long time now. I have installed Fedora Core 9 on my computer. I have set it up as a caching-nameserver and this is working.
Then I wanted to secure my server with iptables, and I have so far made this script:
# Load the connection tracker kernel module
modprobe ip_conntrack
iptables -F
iptables -P INPUT DROP
iptables -P FORWARD DROP
[Code]....
I can reach the dns server with ping. When trying Nslookup it says that it got SERVFAIL from 127.0.0.1 trying next server, and then it times out.
My resolv.conf file lists:
nameserver 127.0.0.1
nameserver DNS-server
To remove it, 238 packages have to go. There are so may the board won't even allow me to post them all. [URL]
View 14 Replies View RelatedIm pulling my hair out trying to get ftp to work through iptables.Im using vsftpd
Table: filter
Chain INPUT (policy DROP)
num target prot opt source destination
1 ACCEPT all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
2 ACCEPT all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
[code].....
I am using Linux version 2.6.18-8.el5xen. I have two nic card. One is configured as local block ip and another is configured with real ip. I can't ssh from outside (i mean on real ip) local lan. But i can ssh on another nic card which is configured as local lan ip. but somedays ago i could ssh from my home but now i cant. I stopped IPtables but still i cant.
View 3 Replies View RelatedWhat i wanted to do was block everything from getting in my pc but still be able to surf the web and still use instant messenger.
View 2 Replies View RelatedOn Fedora 12 each reboot seem to reset my custom iptables rules I have manually added to/etc/sysconfig/iptables. My change are in /etc/sysconfig/iptables.old so obviously some process is removing them.
View 4 Replies View Relatedhow to let iptables to allow dns & dhcp distributions from the server to the clients only w/out exposing the port dhcp port udp 67,68 and tcp port 67,68 as well from the outside world.DHCP only uses udp, but still I also allowed tcp ports as well just to be sure & also I already allow DNS ports in the firewall w/c is not inluded below. linux newbie here,
when i issued the command below to allow those ports only to the internal network the firewall still blocking it. what seems to be the problem?? #iptables -A INPUT -m iprange --src-range 192.168.0.1-192.168.0.254 -p udp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT
[Code]...
I want to block the icmp packets(ping) from the other computer to my RHEL-4 what's the syntax I should use to do so in IPTABLES.
View 2 Replies View RelatedSo I am trying to block any SSH connection attempts on Saturdays and Sundays to be rejected. This is the command I have come up with.
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -o eth0 -i virbr0 -days Sat,Sun -j REJECT
I have also tried many different ways to do this but nothing is working, I am always getting Bad Argument: 'Sat,Sun' error, also when I try to use --days it says it doesn't recognize it.
1: Did chkconfig --level 12345 iptables off (and ip6tables too)
2: Did system-config-firewall and unclicked enable
3: Rebooted:
Dang the stuff is still there:
--
# /etc/init.d/iptables status
Table: mangle
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT)
[code].....
I have blocked all connection with iptables and allowed only the loopback:
iptables -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
iptables -A OUTPUT -o lo -j ACCEPT
iptables -P INPUT DROP
iptables -P OUTPUT DROP
iptables -P FORWARD DROP
Next I want to allow only ssh connections, and also I want to record the IP address of each attempt to access port 22 using the recent module. Then I want to to see if that IP address has attempted to connect 2 or more times within the last 60 seconds, and if not then the packet is accepted:
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -m recent --set --name ssh --rsource
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -m recent ! --rcheck --seconds 60 --hitcount 2 --name ssh --rsource -j ACCEPT
iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 22 -j ACCEPT
iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --sport 22 -j ACCEPT
iptables -A INPUT -j DROP
iptables -A OUTPUT -j DROP
I have eth0 for administration, and vlans eth0.2 eth0.3 and br0 for resource seperation. My esternal interface is ra0.each internal interface is on a seperate subnet, and I have dhcpd giving connecting devices ip addresses out of their assigned network. I want all of the devices to be able to access the internet through NAT, I need to allow them to communicate with port 80 on eth0's subnet
eth0 10.0.0.0/24
eth0.2 10.2.0.0/24
eth0.3 10.3.0.0/24
[code]...
I've tried both the firewall interface that comes with Fedora and Firestarter, neither can configure as I want. So I think I'm going to have to do it by hand. In this laptop I have one 10/100 Nic and one wifi connection, at times either of them can be connected to the network. How can I configure IPtables so that any traffic is allowed out, nothing is allowed in (other than std stateful firewall replies), no icmp and that the fw logs any attempts to connect to the laptop?
View 5 Replies View RelatedWhen I use system-config-firewall, it asks what interfaces to trust. Where does it store that information for iptables (or whatever uses that info)? How iptables knows at what interfaces to use the rules?There is not that kind of information in /etc/sysconf/iptables and iptables-config.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI need to forward a port to use dtella. I'm using Fedora 10, using iptables for my firewall.
I'm currently trying to forward it from terminal with this command:
Code:
sudo iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p udp -i eth0 -d [ip address] --dport 11823 -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.2:80
this is what I get from iptables -L
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
[Code].....
i've got a few questions about iptables. i know how to set up ip tables to only allow from an ip address or a subnetting ip addresses. question is how do i allow from 2 different networks? would i need to create 2 lines of entry in iptables to the same port? e: allow 10.168.1.1 and 196.168.1.1 on port 22 is there a way to put all that in 1 line or would i need to create to rules for the port? i know i can use the ssh allow or deny but i'd like to stop access even before it gets to the ssh. stop it at the source kinda thing.
View 4 Replies View RelatedWondering if anyone knows what the range specification is meant to do for the colonHAIN at the top of the iptables file? e.g. what is the 1:76 range mean for :OUTPUT ACCEPT [1:76] ?
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.1.1 on Sat Dec 19 12:28:00 2009
*filter
:INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
[code]...
I found a behavior of iptables on FC12 to be different and suspect it's broken somehow. Here is what I did
# iptables -F
# iptables -A INPUT -s 127.0.0.1 -p tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT
I don't have a shell on FC12 with me to show the output of iptables -L -n but it looks good after above 2 commands. However, after issuing the following third command iptables -L -n gives "wrong" result
# iptables -R INPUT 1 -s 127.0.0.1 -p tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT
Namely iptables -L -n gives extra "/0" after 127.0.0.1 in the output I have checked on Ubuntu 9.10 and centos 5.4 and they don't give extra "/0"; iptables is not supposed to do that. Of course, I didn't invent these examples but they are abstracted from actual real life scenerio of trying to build rules on our servers.
for quite a while inside of our organization we've been editing /etc/sysconfig/iptables directly without much issues. However it was suggested to us that by doing so we risk losing all those rules whenever some package decides to use lokkit or "system-config-firewal*"Doing a bit of analysis I can't really find any trace of code that would prevent us from maintaining iptables just the way we were (as long as *we* don't use lokkit or system-config-firewall*) since "service iptables save" is a valid technique and uses iptables-save script which is part of iptables package and *not* part of system-config-firewall*
So we've got some evidence that may confirm our usage as valid, however it would be nice to know if indeed this is *not* a recommended way of maintaining iptables and we should reconsider how we approach it.
I'd like to pass all traffic between bridge ports via the FORWARDING chain, so I changed following sysctl parameters:
Code:
net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-ip6tables = 1
net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables = 1
[code]...
I just upgraded my fedora 13 to fedora 14. I changed the cpu and the motherboard so i had to install from scratch...but I saved my iptables.
The problem is that
I do all the suff
service iptables save
And apparently it works...
But everytime I reboot I have to re run the script to forward Internet...Everything else works just fine...I mean I can ssh, vnc, etc but wont forward intel :S dont know why?
i was hoping that someone in here could possibly help me out with my iptables rule set. First here is what i would like iptables to do, i want iptables to deny all packets or traffic from the outside coming in and for output allow the things i need like web and irc etc... Also, i would like iptables to deny access to all services like sendmail and ssh except i would like localhost to have access to everything. What i mean by localhost is that when i run my iptables script it loads fine except when i try ssh from localhost i get this output:ssh -l user localhostssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote hostI know what most of you are thinking, why do i need to ssh into localhost from localhost just open another terminal, well i am getting myself familiar with iptables i want all services logged and blocked but not from localhost. I cant seem to figure out this problem and i have tried several different things. Here is my iptables script, I am hoping that someone out there can tell me what i am doing wrong...
#!/bin/bash
iptables -v -F;
iptables -v -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT;
[code]....