General :: Get Berkeley DB With 1.85 Compatibility Mode?
Jan 9, 2010
I am trying to install gnome-bin 1.4.2 from source but it is telling be I need my Berkeley DB to have 1.85 compatibility mode - how do I do this? I've tried both the libdb4.2-dev package (which give the error below) and the libdb1-dev package (which tells me I am missing DB support all together).
Code:
checking for dbopen... no
checking for dbopen in -ldb... no
checking for dbopen in -ldb1... no
checking for __db185_open in -ldb-3... no
checking for __db185_open in -ldb-4... no
configure: error: Your db library is missing db 1.85 compatibility mode. How do I get Berkeley 1.85 compatibility mode on my system?
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jan 13, 2016
So I just recently got an HP pro 1005 all in one PC and tried to install Debian 8.2 on it through a bootable Uefi USB, however, when trying to install, there's always an error like this: "The attempt to mount a file system with type ext4 in LVM VG debian-vg, LV root at /failed."
Also, no matter how many times I completely wipe every partition, there's always this message at the start of the installation saying Windows is already installed as BIOS compatibility mode, and asks me if i still want to install as Uefi, I was wondering if that had anything to do with my error.
I checked the drives health and there wasn't any kind of problems, passed all the tests.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 19, 2010
I am about to do a clean install of 10.04 (64-bit) on a ThinkPad X201. The machine will only be running Ubuntu (i.e., no dual-boot). Is there any reason to use compatibility mode for the SATA boot drive, or will AHCI work fine?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 25, 2010
Have win98se on secondary master as it fully supports some devices Ubuntu doesn't (Aries scan it pro, pci smart modem, Lexmark printer/scanner x2250), Lucid is on primary master. Grub seamlessly booted windows using menu.lst entry:
Code:
titleWindows 95/98/Me
rootnoverify(hd1,0)
savedefault
[Code]....
Would be grateful if anyone knows a configuration that works, as using CMOS/BIOS setup to boot windows is a pain.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jan 7, 2011
I just installed Berkeley DB 4.2 on my Ubuntu following the guide in below url.[URL].. I realized, I have installed wrong version of Berkeley DB and I want to uninstall it. How do I do that?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 1, 2011
As the topic title states, I would like to know the preferred way of viewing the contents of a Berkeley DB file. The machine the file is on is running SuSE 9.3, with perl 5.8.6 and php 5.2.0 installed. (I'm not sure if stating that was necessary, but my understanding is that the more information I can provide you, the better. The purpose to this question is this: I have been requested to look into coming up with some form of Geocoding software for one of my company's clients. Specifically, I've been requested to look into trying to obtain Census tract/block information.
I discovered the Perl module Geo::Coder::US, which uses Census input (TIGERLine files) to create a Berkeley DB file, then reads said file to produce its own output. However, the output from Geo::Coder::US only provides latitude and longitude information.At the moment, my only interest is in popping the Berkeley DB file generated with the import script packaged with the Geo::Coder::US module. I'm trying to see what the contents of that DB file are, so I can determine if the information I'm after is even in there in the first place.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 10, 2010
I am trying to install Berkeley DB on debian5 machine, and when i run the "make" command, it gives the error, "command not found"
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 8, 2011
I am using cent os 5 .I want to uninstall Berkeley DB which is installed by default during installation. how can I uninstall Berkeley DB from my Linux machine.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 14, 2009
I'm having trouble getting subversion working on Centos 4.7. When I try to create a repository using:
Code:
svnadmin create /path/to/repo
I get:
Code:
svn: Berkeley DB error while creating environment for filesystem repo/db: Invalid argument
svn: bdb: Berkeley DB library configured to support only DB_PRIVATE environments
I've searched the Net, with little luck. Threads seem to suggest that Centos has this flag compiled into the Berkeley DB RPM by default; whereas SVN doesn't want it. Someone, somewhere, must have got this to work and I'm sure it's something really simple I'm doing wrong.
[code]....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 30, 2010
Below is a print out of my partition Table from Fdisk, in Cylinder mode, Sector mode, and then in expert mode?
Why in expert mode does it look like Partitions 2 and 3 share the same sector / hd / Cylinders? Is this OK?
Code:
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 27, 2010
To run applications compiled for RedHat 4 Enterprise (gcc3.4) on RedHat 5 Enterprise (gcc4.1), what should I do?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 12, 2011
My open-ldap does not detect berkeley db.When I wanted to install open-ldap, I got the following message:
Code:
checking for Berkeley DB major version in db.h... 5
checking for Berkeley DB minor version in db.h... 2
[code]....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 1, 2010
While installing berkeley db on linux i m getting the following error:
"configure: error: no acceptable C compiler found in $PATH"
I m installing this for postfix.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Sep 9, 2011
I have downloaded "db-4.8.26" and trying to compile it for MIPS. I am using the following configuration options
dist/configure --host=mips CC=/opt/montavista/pro/devkit/mips/fp_be/bin/mips_fp_be-gcc LD=/opt/montavista/pro/devkit/mips/fp_be/bin/mips_fp_be-ld CFLAGS="-g -O2 -lpthread -D_REENTRANT" LDFLAGS=-Bshareable
but compilation is giving lot of errors for mutex.
./libtool --mode=compile /opt/montavista/pro/devkit/mips/fp_be/bin/mips_fp_be-gcc -c -I. -I../dist/.. -g -O2 -lpthread -D_REENTRANT ../dist/../mutex/mut_pthread.c
[Code]...
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 31, 2011
Im configuring virtual users for ftp and in few guides i find that i need this database.This guides were outdated so i cant follow them(by downloading with its commands), can anyone explain me something about this db(like, where to download, how, did i have installed other version of this db with ubuntu server default packages)...By the way i need to create login file with users and their passwords, for example:tomfoofredbar
Then i must create actual database file like this:
Code:
db_load -T -t hash -f logins.txt /etc/vsftpd_login.db
(that requires the Berkeley db program installed)
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 30, 2010
Can someone share a website where you can look whether a hardware device is linux compatible? All the websites I've gone to are useless.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Aug 10, 2010
I am an activist. I am becoming concerned with security on line because I have posted videos exposing SERIOUS corruption within the government at all levels. With all the recent claims of executive authority in the name of cyber security and govt eavesdropping I am interested in finding a more secure op sys. Windows is to vulnerable. I have an HP7845 Sound Blaster 64 Sound card. Radeon 9800 video card. I have a large volume of videos and media/research reports I cant afford to lose. How easy is the conversion? And also concerned with software. Will programs work the same or at all?Is my equipment even compatible with other opsystems. Is there a risk of glitches that would curtail my efforts after attempting the change. I KNOW NOTHING about other systems hell I can barely run XP. However I would hate to lose files or go through a months long debugging venture.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 3, 2011
If Apache license 1 and 1.1 are not compatible with GPL v2 and GPL v3 and the only compatibility is Apache License v2 with GPL v3 how can android kernel be GPL v2 and userspace programs be Apache License 2? More specifically GPL v2 requires all derived works and programs to have the same license as it has, therefore Apache shouldn't be allowed inside android. I've read on a website something like "Google created one middle layer between Linux kernel, without violating GPL. And 3rd party can't see the source code of hardware driver and app" and then "So in oder to get more vendor support, Google specifically modified Linux Kernel, transfer those features which should belong to Kernel, to its userspace source." The above seems vague explanation, even if you put a middle layer this middle layer becomes GPL and anything above as well.
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 6, 2011
a. How can I determine the hardware type of the machine where the linux is running ?
b. Also, what exactly is the difference between machine hardware name and hardware platform ? (uname -m and uname -i)
c. Output from my machine shows,
- uname -i as i386 and
- uname -m as i686
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 1, 2010
My linux workstation recently crashed. After rebooting, Linux (Red Hat 5.3) will not boot properly and automatically went into emergency mode or recovery mode i think. I can still see my /home/user/ and all the files inside.I boot from CD to rescue mode and tried mounting read-only the /dev/sd5 which contains the files in the crashed hard disk to try to copy out my files but mounting was unsuccessful (invalid argument). I checked the filesystem type using fsck -N /dev/sda5 and shows it to ext2. i tried to mount another known working hdd and was successful.
My question is why in emergency mode, the crashed hdd is able to be mounted automatically as read-only but cannot be done in rescue mode thru a bootable CD?Is there any special mount options used in emergency mode?I also cannot copy out in emergency mode booting from the crashed hard disk as everything is read only.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 11, 2010
Suppose you have glibc 2.5 compiled with kernel headers 2.6.18. Is it safe to run this glibc with Linux kernel 2.6.32? Is it safe to run this glibc with Linux kernel 2.6.9?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 29, 2011
I'm looking for an overview of binary compatible linux derivates to enterprise Linux versions. A usable definition of this compatibility is given on Wikipedia. I already know candidates for this:
CentOS (Community ENTerprise
Operating System) is binary
compatible to RHEL (Red Hat
Enterprise Linux).
SL (Scientific Linux) is binary
compatible to RHEL (Red Hat
Enterprise Linux).
I think there are for sure many more. Who can help? Maybe this will grow into a fine overview... I'd like to edit the question to complete it with the data from answers.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 6, 2011
I've recently installed x64 Linux Mint 11, basically Ubuntu Natty. Since the install I've found that 32-bit applications which used to run on my Ubuntu system are rejected by my Mint 11 system. When I use the 'file' utility to check the binary, it correctly identifies it as a 32-bit elf, but I can't invoke the application. I've tried starting it from bash and os.system a la python, to no avail, so I suspect that it must have something to do with 32-bit binary compatibility mode but my knowledge of that sub-system and how to enable it is limited, can anyone assist?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 18, 2010
I removed my Ubuntu install and decided to replace it with Debian. I backed up the /home directory onto the Windoze installation on the other hard drive. That was a "home.disk" file. Now, I copied the file over to the Debian hard drive, and can't figure out how to recover the files. Is this possible to do in Debian?
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jun 4, 2010
Currently have just Linux on my main computer (brother built it for me, knew I wanted to try Linux, so just put Ubuntu on).
Old computer (very old, 256MB Ram etc) runs Windows 2000 very slowly, currently will only start up in safe mode (not sure whether this is because it's not currently attached to the router or printer, or whether more serious).
I'd like to put linux (qimo, DSL or puppy probably) on the old computer so my 3-year-old can use it instead of demanding the penguin game (tuxpaint) whenever I want to use my computer!
So, wondering whether to try and shrink the windows partition or whether to just go for linux only. That computer was second-hand as well, so I don't have the windows disks.
The two things I'm worried about:
1) sometimes do some web design, and how would I check whether IE will display my pages without strange problems 'cos it doesn't follow the standards...
2) printing out photos at short notice: husband picked the printer so we're lumbered with a canon pixma MX700. It can do basic printing but won't communicate with linux to do photo quality (no linux drivers...) If I have plenty of time I use a photo printing service such as photobox.
Any thoughts how I can get round these problems so I can just jettison windows without worry? I don't have the spare cash to buy windows 7 or whatever to run in a virtual box...
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 24, 2010
I've just formatted by usb drive to vfat, as I heard that is best to use in both Linux and Windows? What do you think?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 1, 2010
if the Iomega 500gb minimax external usb hard drive is compatible with Linux Ubuntu 10.10, and does anyone have an opinion of the drive. Would I have to reformat it to get it to work with Linux.
Tony044
DELL INSPIRON 6400 LAPTOP
RAM: 1gb
HDD: 1gb
OS: Linux Ubuntu 10.10
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 7, 2010
I've been using cyrus and sendmail together for a very very long time now. Just recently I upgraded to fedora 13 and now my virtual users can not send email from the /etc/sasldb2 passwords. I get in the /var/log/messages sendmail[31427]: unable to open Berkeley db /etc/sasldb2: Unknown error: Its weird that they can still log in and get email from imapd.conf
sasl_pwcheck_method:auxprop saslauthd
sasl_auxprop_plugin: sasldb
sasl_mech_list: LOGIN PLAIN CRAM-MD5 DIGEST-MD5
[code].....
I even tried re-creating sasldb2 and sasldblistusers2 shows my two users 'one' that is also a local user account and the saslauthd authenticates when sending emails, but the virtual user 'two' can't send just only can log in to receive. /etc/sysconfig/saslauthd is set up as mech=pam. but I don't see how that would be relevant to this issue.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 13, 2011
I'm currently an user of OpenSuse, newer version of Suse don't support some of the hardware that I use and previous version of Suse will cease to have support in a few months. So I'm considering other versions of Linux and Ubuntu comes to mind. So I like to know if Ubuntu (Desktop 32 bits) supports this devices:
NVIDIA Quadro2 Pro (including 3d support)
Wacom Intuos 2 SERIAL tablet
Epson ActionScanner II PARALLEL
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 7, 2009
How well is the ext4 new file system mounting compatibility with the older ext3 previous Linux installations ? I refer to Ubuntu 9.04 and the new Fedora 11 which have the option to install with the ext4 file format. Will it be better if I install with the older ext3, so that I will be able to mount all other Linux from each other in a multi-boot system ?
View 6 Replies
View Related
