General :: How To Do Architecture To Omap3530
Jul 8, 2010How can i do this architecture to omap3530 ?
View 1 RepliesHow can i do this architecture to omap3530 ?
View 1 Repliesi am using acer extensa 4620 laptop of 32bit architecture with core 2 duo processor and 1 gb ddr2.i have installed RHEL 6. i want to do practice on virtual machine for my rhce exam.due to 32bit architecture i am not able to use kvm one more problen,during installation of RHEL6 i cannot use "install or upgrade" option while booting dvd.after entering this opiton my screen goes blank nathing comes,but i am able to install usic "basic video driver option" same problem i face when i enter in rescue mode also..... nothing is displayed...the screen goes blank
View 2 Replies View RelatedMy PC is has an AMD 6000 CPU. Here are the image options for the distribution that I want to download:
[alpha][arm][hppa][i386][ia64][m68k][mips][mipsel][powerpc][sparc][s390][source]
I have installed Fedora 13 lately, however its architecture is i686... i want to install the GNU C Compiler (both c and c++)..... now i searched for i686 architecture gcc but most of them are not compiled.. and are archives e.g., gcc-4.4.1.tar..... Also, some RPMs say about dependencies. Is there a simpler solution?
How to install Gcc, i dont have any compiler in Fedora even cc is not there!! I installed fedora from a live cd i got with the Digit Magazine!
I'm using Core 2 Duo. So, from Intel website I found that it is 64-bit architecture CPU.
Long back I've installed Ubuntu OS on this machine. But I'm not sure if I installed x86-32 or x86-64 version of Linux. I want to know which version of Linux I'm using. How to know that?
How to find the same on windows?
What is the command to find out what CPU architecture the Linux Box holds out of following:
[Code]...
I've just finished installing debian 5.0.3 on my pc and i chose the installation set for the Intel x86 architecture. Does it mean that my OS is then 32 bit and will be used to run only 32 bits applications ? I'm doing also software developments with gcc with my linux box. Using this os and the gcc tools, for this os, will my software only be 32 bits ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am trying to insert a .ko into my kernel and I am getting the 'invalid module format' error. But the kernel object is being generated from or is included in a binary which sets up and populates a driver path when run. How can I tell what architecture/target/anything that .ko is meant for?
I know that I can use the uname and /proc/cpuinfo to see my current info, but I am also not sure what I might need to do to get them to sync up. I am running on a minimal, cli-install of Ubuntu8.10 right now. It's freshly installed (onto a 2GB USB drive) & imaged, so bring on the drastic changes.
Is there a command or any steps to follow?
View 3 Replies View Relatedi have purchased a Lenovo y410 and want to install LINNUX on it configuation intel core 2 duo p7300,ram 2GB hdd 250 .i haave found that download link at ubuntu giving us i386.iso and openSUSE has given a link to i586.iso under 32bit processors .For my hardware confifuration which will b suitable.Is there be any thing related as far as i know p4 has 786 architecture then why they are not providing that in download links
kindly help me to which one should i go for
I've been running Fedora 10 since it came out (I'm doing some numerical modeling for my thesis), but I've got some questions about a new box I'm going to build. I am going to build a new 64bit machine, dual boot with Win7 and Poseidon Linux (waiting for the 64bit version to come out later this year).is there an advantage to having each OS reside on a different physical HDD? meaning - 1 hard drive for Win and 1 hard drive for Linux and just decide which HDD to boot when I turn the machine on. -or is it better to have them reside on the same HDD and just have a separate HDD for data / storage? -is there a good resource to describe some optimal architecture's? I've searched through the forums and haven't found anything that concise / on-target / similar. As additional info: this box will be my livelihood, so right now, money is not really an object in terms of HDDs, etc.
View 3 Replies View RelatedWhat are the challenges that are involved in porting an Operating system to a new architecture? Say I want to port linux to new architecture called XYZ, what are the things that should be taken care of?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI kept bumping into it all the time, only now when I need it I can't find it anywhere! What architecture is the kernel of my machine?
2.6.18-194.el5
I'm trying to cross compile the GNU make for Alpha Architecture on my i686 PC and the GNU make i compiled would be placed in my virtual hard disk which is a Alpha based linux simulated system. My question is now , I'm able to cross compile the GNU make on my i686 real PC machine , but when i let the make program run in my virtual machine , it pops out the error ..
make: /lib/libc.so.6.1: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by make)
After that, I try another alternative , and I read through the file "INSTALL" on the GNU make directory that I downloaded from the internet . In this case , I downloaded make-3.81. On the sub section "Compiling For Multiple Architectures" It says that
"You can compile the package for more than one kind of computer at the same time, by placing the object files for each architecture in their own directory. To do this, you must use a version of `make' that supports the `VPATH' variable, such as GNU `make'. `cd' to the
directory where you want the object files and executables to go and run the `configure' script.`configure' automatically checks for the
source code in the directory that `configure' is in and in `..'. If you have to use a `make' that does not support the `VPATH'
variable, you have to compile the package for one architecture at a time in the source code directory. After you have installed the
package for one architecture, use `make distclean' before reconfiguring for another architecture." And I do not understand the line "by placing the object files for each architecture in their own directory" . What object files that I should put ?
what exact difference between i386 and i686 architecture based machine. Both suppose to be using 32 bit OS ?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have just changed over from Windows and want to use Spotify in Ubuntu bit to do this I think I need Wine. However in the Ubuntu Software centre it says that wine is "not available for your hardware architecture". What does this meen and is there a way around this?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am using 64-bit architecture and getting the following error when using 'alien' command:
Code:
alien -k cnijfilter-common-3.00-1.i386.rpm
cnijfilter-common-3.00-1.i386.rpm is for architecture i386 ; the package cannot be built on
[code]....
What would an Intel Core 2 Duo chip run? 32 or 64 bit linux software?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI start to learn wpa_supplicant recently,and I got the code already,but the code is complicated,and I don't know how to start learning,and Is there any book to discuss the architecture about wpa_supplicant?
View 4 Replies View RelatedIf I want to install yum group like
Code:
It suggests me to install packages for both architectures like x386 and x86_64.
Is it possible to install yum group only for certain architecture - `uname -i` architecture ?
is ther any application with which i could draw architecture diagrams for software development. used visio while on windows but now need an alternate for tat, dont need the exact alternative but just for diagrams.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI've installed UBUNTU on Intel based system afterwards I moved the hard drive to AMD based system (Sempron 3000+)The problem is that the default architecture remains i686. Should it be i386 or amd64 and how could i change it?
View 7 Replies View RelatedI'm using kernel 2.6 (RED hat ver 4), i have source code for kernel 2.6 , and i want to build zImage to my Board PXA 255 (architecture = arm)XScale;
can any body give the steps how to build the zImage to arm architecture; do i need the tool chain , and my system has gcc 3.4.6,if any fields are required pls notify me, m newbie to linux
I clicked on i386 instead of x86 64. The box is laptop AMD64, and I stopped the upgrade at this point: Should I continue it and change later? Or delete files and start again?
View 2 Replies View RelatedAnaconda instakler.The details of the architecture of the anaconda installer.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have configured for yumex that I want to exclude all *.i386 updates. Still "yum downgrade <anything>" can download and install i386 packages. One other thing which is not purely x86_64 issue, but yum/yumex issue anyway. I noticed that yum updates daemon (yum-updatesd) does not work any more, or at least for x86_64, so I enabled yum_cron with catastrophic consequences. It automatically updated my amarok 1.4 to amarok 2.* although I have an exclude in Yumex for amarok! Here I go again!! I am not sure if I remember how to make 1.4 functional again...
View 3 Replies View RelatedI was just wondering if there is an alternative to Adobe Flash. I just checked the Software Center and it told me that "there is no version for your architecture". As everyone is well aware a lot of sites are Flash heavy. Anyone have a solution? I am running Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic on a Dell Dimension E521 with AMD Athlon X2 4200+.
View 3 Replies View RelatedTrying to install draftsight on my 64 bit 10.10 system to give it a try. I do solid modeling work for a living (Inventor/Solidworks) and have to use Autocad. Ran across this program a month or so ago and really like it. Much less bloated that AC but does a nice job in the 2d world for a basic program. The package installer gives me a wrong architecture message (see attached). I think I had to change that to get adobe AIR installed and wonder if its possible to do the same here.
View 9 Replies View RelatedWhich architecture to use with an Intel Core 2 Duo processor?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI recently tried installing GNOME Inform for Linux on my lpia architecture ubuntu netbook remix-running netbook, only to get the error message:
dpkg: error processing gnome-inform7_5Z71-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb (--install): package architecture (amd64) does not match system (lpia)Errors were encountered while processing: gnome-inform7_5Z71-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb
I have not been able to find a Lpia archive, although I will keep on looking. Is there anything else I could do, or could someone direct me to an Lpia archive? I'm specifically trying to get the GUI version of Inform, not the Command-Line version.