Fedora :: FC 13 Mismatched Java Versions?

Oct 7, 2010

I have been at this for awhile and i need to know which direction to go to enguage this problem.I am trying to get jnlp files to open automatically in chrome / firefox. Before you flame me, i have followed the instructions on the above "handy yellow link" to get java installed and set up.My goal is to click on "draw" at this link and have it open and run automatically in Chrome. [URL].. Nothing seems to happen when i click the link. From what i understand, i need jre 1.6. I sucesfully installed it from:[URL]..

I ran the alternative commands in the "handy yellow link" and selected 1.6. When i run "yum install java" i get the output: Package java-1.5.0-gcj-1.5.0.0-32.fc13.i686 already installed and latest version
Nothing to do Probably just an alternative command that i'm unaware of, but i cant find a simple fix.

View 10 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Ubuntu :: Having Multiple Versions Of Java Running On The Same Computer

Feb 4, 2010

The main problem is that the software was developed about 15 years ago and is incompatible with the most current version of Java. I would like to know how to install an older version of Java so that I can use it with just this one application, without changing the version of Java that I use for everything else.

View 1 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Remove Current Version Of Java And Upgrade To The Newest Versions?

Dec 30, 2010

I'm looking to remove my current version of Java and upgrade to the newest versions of Java and hopefully any other components like flash etc.

View 5 Replies View Related

General :: HP-UX Error: Ld: Mismatched ABI For -lMrm

Mar 17, 2011

I am trying to port some of our code into this new HP2660 system(ia 64 HP-UX 11i version 3).
The source code are C++ code.

I also listed our system's information after the error message.

/opt/aCC/bin/aCC -Wl,-aarchive_shared -L/usr/lib/X11R6 -L. -L/opt/aCC/lib -L/opt
/graphics/common/lib -L/usr/lib/Motif2.1 -L/home/sun/REPLAY/lib replay.o libreplay.a -I/
opt/mlib/include -lMrm -lXm -lXp -lXt -lXext -lX11 -lXhp11 -AP -lX11 -lm -ldld -lMrm -lSM
-lICE -lXp -lXm -lXt -lXext -lX11 -mlp64 -lm -v +DD64 /home/DRS/lib/brslib.a -o replay

[Code].....

View 1 Replies View Related

Debian Configuration :: Modules Get Mismatched With The Running Kernel Version?

Sep 30, 2010

is there a common reason why modules get mismatched with the running kernel version?why do I always get that uneasy feeling like I'm headed in the wrong direction?

View 4 Replies View Related

Debian Configuration :: New Squeeze Install - Mismatched Fdisk Cylinder Numbers?

Feb 10, 2011

I just installed Squeeze on a 4 disk system, each disk set up identically with 4 partitions, with the last partition of each disk used for a raid 5 array. I used the squeeze installer, and chose the 'manual' partition option for this setup.

After installation, fdisk reports the ending cylinder number of each of the 4 disks as one more than the total number of cylinders for the disk. I've never seen this before. In the past when I've used fdisk to manually partition disks, the final cylinder number was always equal to the total number of cylinders.

For example:

Disk /dev/sdd: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x000937dd

[Code]...

The disk has 60801 cylinders, and the 'End" cylinder number for /dev/sdd4 is reported as 60802. I would have expected it to be 60801. Is this a bug or problem? It's working OK, but I don't know if it will cause instability in the future.

View 1 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Difference Between LTS Versions And Other Versions?

Jun 30, 2011

I'm not to clear on the difference between LTS versions and other versions, but think I may want to go with LTS. Can someone tell me if my thinking is correct given the following situation: I have some very cool, but very expensive software installed with a group license from my school, a school which I am not going to be attending for too much longer. So I want to go as long as possible without reinstalling Ubuntu, because once the product is licensed it will be licensed until I reinstall Ubuntu (or I uninstall the program). So I think this is going to require me keep the Ubuntu version I install as long as possible.

So in this case, should I go with 10.04LTS or should I just install Natty Narwhal and keep that as long as possible? It looks like 10.04LTS will be "supported" longer, but I'm not exactly clear on all that "supported" entails. Presumable it means security and software updates will be available for 10.04LTS for much longer than 11.x versions? So I'm thinking I should go with 10.04LTS

Is my thinking correct in going with 10.04LTS? Edit: It was pointed out that this would be against my contractual agreements. Which I suppose is probably true.

View 8 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Versions Of Localepurge, Deborphan And Debfoster - Do They Exist In The Fedora Software Repository

Mar 7, 2009

install of Fedora, always used Debian or Ubuntu before now, and am looking for versions of localepurge, deborphan and debfoster - do they exist in the Fedora Software Repository?

View 10 Replies View Related

Fedora :: How To Know All The Available Kernel Versions

Mar 17, 2011

How do I know the exact kernel version (or rpm package name) of fedora 14 without having to install one? I couldn't find the information on the the website. And one more question. Does one fedora distribution has only one kernel available all the time? Where can I find all the kernels for a particular distribution (for example Fedora 12) distributed by Fedora Project? I can find all the available kernels for a RedHat Enterprise distribution on [URL], but not for Fedora.

View 1 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Install Older Versions Of (10 Or 11)

Jan 17, 2010

i wanna install older versions of fedora(10 or 11), and after looking everywhere, i found that if you search the available mirrors through the download page. This allows you to select mirrors with the version you want. I didnt know if that was the way to get older versions or if there is another way.

View 2 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Keep More Than 3 Versions Of Kernel After Update?

Mar 11, 2010

When yum updates the kernel it keeps the last 3 versions; the older kernels are deleted. Is there a way to keep more than 3 versions?

I presently have one working version and two which are not compatible with my machine. One more bad version and my system will be toast. (I would like to keep the "bad" versions for testing.)

View 2 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Install And Use Multiple Versions Of Gcc (on F15)?

Jun 6, 2011

For my work it is extremely useful to have multiple versions of gcc available. I've done this in the past under Ubuntu simply by enabling alternative or older repositories but in Fedora land I've not been able to find a standard automated way of doing this. Can anybody point me in the right direction?

View 13 Replies View Related

General :: Command To Check The Java Version: Java -versionand Got :bash :java: Command Not Found?

Jul 26, 2010

I've just installed java (jre-6u21-linux-i586.bin) on Red Hat 4.4 AS and issued this command to check the java version: java -versionand got :bash :java: command not found

View 4 Replies View Related

Fedora :: F12 Two Versions On Boot - Cannot Launch Firefox

Dec 21, 2009

I installed f12 few days back. A pop up came which mentioned '336 new updates available' and I opted 'install only security updates'.

Now in the boot screen 3 options come instead of 2:
1. Fedora 2.6.31.6-166.fc12.i686.pae
2. Fedora 2.6.31.6-127.fc12.i686.pae
3. Windows

I am able to boot into both versions of fedora, but I cannot launch firefox it says-'your version of SQlite is too old and the application cannot run'. How do I correct the screw up. Should I re-install the whole thing....? why is it showing as 2 versions....? I installed yumex recently, is it the reason.....?

View 8 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Keeping Multiple Versions Of A Package?

Jan 1, 2010

Some times i need the older version of some packages in my system...side by side with the new one.i.e mostly i found older version openssl package for supporting dependency of some programs Can I keep the following libraries at the same time in my system by installing multiple versions of openssl?

[Code]...

View 3 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Replace Packages With The Most Current Versions?

Sep 25, 2010

is there a way to have reposync replace packages with the most current versions? because when i do it for my "network repo" it seems to just add more and more.

View 3 Replies View Related

Fedora :: PAE Related - Kernel Versions Are Different In Two Folders?

Dec 11, 2010

In the processing of reinstalling VirtualBox, I found this:2.6.35.6-48.fc14.i686.PAE/source -> /usr/src/kernels/2.6.35.6-48.fc14.i686.PAE/ ,but this folder don't exist.。 I try to relink the ln as source -> /usr/src/kernels/2.6.35.9-64.fc14.i686.PAE , but VirtualBox still get problem with the kernel. Since VirB works fine with other 2 kernels, the solution for this is not quite needed, but I just wonder why this happens. See below. I don't know why these two folder contain different version of kernels. Anybody get an idea?

2.6.35.6-48.fc14.i686.PAE]$ ll /usr/src/kernels/; ll /lib/modules/; ll /lib/modules/2.6.35.6-48.fc14.i686.PAE/ |grep build
total 16
drwxr-xr-x. 22 root root 4096 Nov 19 14:58 2.6.35.6-45.fc14.i686
drwxr-xr-x. 22 root root 4096 Nov 15 00:04 2.6.35.6-48.fc14.i686
drwxr-xr-x. 22 root root 4096 Dec 8 17:08 2.6.35.9-64.fc14.i686
drwxr-xr-x. 22 root root 4096 Dec 8 15:19 2.6.35.9-64.fc14.i686.PAE

[Code]...

View 4 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Prompt End User To Install New Versions?

May 30, 2011

Does Fedora Now Prompt End Users To Install New Versions? If so, what a terrible idea and how do I disable it? So, I get a late night call from one of the people I support with their PC. You know, the basic PC user who barely knows enough to be dangerous. I'm sure we all have friends like this, who we help out and keep Linux running for them. Anyway, he says Fedora prompted him to upgrade to Fedora 15 (from 13) and of course, he says OK. He usually says OK when fedora asks to update his software.

Now things are hosed, he can't get on-line and worst of all, he's running F15 with Gnome3 and can't find his way around or do the things he's used to doing. Why on earth would fedora prompt to upgrade to a new version via the net? (..btw - he said it took forever.. ) I'm sure this exact scenario will be played out 1000s of times and peeps like me will be wasting lots of time straightening things out after the fact. Seems to me Fedora should not prompt for full version upgrades. It's trouble waiting to happen and that kind of thing should be user initiated by someone who actually knows what they are doing, so as to avoid the scenario that just played out with me.

View 7 Replies View Related

Red Hat / Fedora :: Is Linux Product Of REDHAT And All Its Versions?

Jan 25, 2011

Is linux is a product of REDHAT and all its versions.

View 2 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Install Multiple Versions Of Package?

Sep 29, 2010

I do quite a bit of testing of a FOSS package, which I install from rpm. At any one time there may be 3 versions ( current release, new release candidate, and snapshot of trunk) that I wish to test. If I stick to normal naming conventions (i.e. current release fred-2010.0...rpm, release candidate fred-2010.2...rpm, and trunk fred-2010.3...rpm) it seems to me that I can only have one version installed at any one time. Is there a 'proper' way of managing this (using the package manager), so that I can have multiple versions installed at any one time?

View 10 Replies View Related

Software :: Install Multiple Versions Of GCC On Fedora 12?

Apr 9, 2011

How to install multiple versions of GCC on Fedora 12? Using yum, I upgraded my g++ to 4.4.4-10. I want to install a second version 4.6.0 of GCC.

[Code]...

View 9 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Safe To Use I686 And X64 Versions Of Same Package At Same Time?

Nov 11, 2009

Could using i686 and x64 versions of same package introduce problems later? Currently my system is 64bit , but some apps require i686 versions of already installed x64 packages.

View 1 Replies View Related

Fedora :: What Is The Timing On Updated RPMs For New BOINC Versions

Jun 4, 2010

I've just recently started using Fedora again and have a question about BOINC.I see that Fedora 13 is using 6.10.45, but the latest recommended release is 6.10.56.What is the timing on updated RPMs for new BOINC versions? Or is there a guide to updating manually, which I've been unable to locate?

View 4 Replies View Related

Red Hat / Fedora :: Pseudo-ttys - Both BSD And SVR5 Versions Seem To Be Incomplete

May 21, 2010

I'm trying to complete the porting to RHEL 5 of a commercial application that we've had running on AIX and SCO for decades. It originally ran on dumb-terminals, and even now runs on dumb-terminal emulators that run on Windows. We have thousands of customers, many of whom we'd like to migrate to Linux. We're pretty much done with the port, with the exception of this little glitch we're having with pseudo-ttys...

Our app utilizes pseudo-ttys, such that sub-portions of the application run under a screen manager that provides for screen-switching of multiple instances of the sub-apps on non-GUI terminals, some of which are still running serial. In this regard, it is not unlike the GNU "screen" program. However, it also supports file transfers over serial links using zmodem, and requires the ability to switch in and out of a fully 8-bit transparent mode where the screen switching keyboard commands must be ignored.

On AIX, we're using the BSD TIOCUCNTL (UIOCCMD) capability to send commands from the sub-app to the screen manager. TIOCUCNTL provides custom user ioctls and is an ideal way to solve the problem. It is not implemented on Linux, and the "alternative" of TIOCPKT does not provide arbitrary ioctls so at best we'd have to commandeer some of the existing TIOCPKT ioctls for our own use if that's even possible. TIOCPKT seems like a hack, it apparently was implemented not as a general mechanism but to solve problems specific to rlogin/rlogind.

SCO didn't support TIOCUCNTL either, so years ago we used the SVR5 alternative of putmsg/getmsg. This is a streams-based mechanism of sending control information over streams separate from the data. While RHEL 5 seems to have man pages indicating these commands exist, and in fact you can link programs using them to libc without errors, they are apparently stubbed out and return "function not implemented." This seems to be, according to this Wiki, due to certain Linux factions deeming that streams are "technically inadequate":

Certainly, I would agree that a streams implementation that is incomplete is undoubtedly "technically inadequate."

At the same time, it would appear that the SVR5 method of pseudo-tty is now the recommended implementation, the BSD one being "deprecated" (not to mention, also incomplete on Linux, given TIOCUCNTL is missing):

So here I am trying to figure out how to solve the problem. I have found a library that apparently implements the getmsg/putmsg commands for Linux, called libLiS. However, according to IBM, it has a problem with SELinux:

We've had to disable SELinux for other reasons anyway, so this is not a show stopper for us, and I am actively exploring using it as our solution. However, I've never been exactly crazy about the idea of depending on disabling security features to make something work. But, there's something to be said for the compatibility it would offer for our apps.

However, it occured ot me that we are probably not the first to have this problem, and was wondering if perhaps there is another solution that we should consider.

It has occured to me to use named pipes, but this would be rather ugly--we'd have to maintain a directory full of hundreds of named pipes, probably named after the associated ptys that the sub-apps could use to issue control commands to their screen manager, and the manager would have to monitor these pipes for commands, etc.-- certainly possible, but it seems like it might be re-inventing the wheel a bit, or at the very least, is a somewhat kludgy work-around to the apparent lack of any user-customizable control mechanisms in the pseudo-ttys. And we'd have to support it in addition to the code for the other methods since those platforms aren't going away anytime soon (SCO death-throes notwithstanding).

View 1 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Remove The Earlier Versions Of Dupes Without Adverse Effects?

Aug 22, 2009

Code:
[root@HOME ~]# package-cleanup --dupes
Setting up yum
Loaded plugins: protectbase, refresh-packagekit
Excluding Packages in global exclude list
Finished
0 packages excluded due to repository protections
Excluding Packages in global exclude list
Finished
[Code]....

Would it be ok to remove the earlier versions of dupes above, without adverse effects?

View 3 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Two Versions Of Flash In Firefox And Keep The Scrollbars At The Side And Bottom?

Feb 14, 2010

No matter how many times I update or install new flash plugins in firefox, I always wind up with 2 versions of the 'Shockwave Flash' plugin. The first is the prevous version of Adobe, the second is the current version of either Adobe, Gnash or Swfdec. I use yum to keep my packages in synch. When a new version of Adobe comes though, it erases the older version of the currently installed plugin, keeps the newer currently installed version, and installs itself as the new version, both versions enabled.

Hope that paragraph makes sense to you, it gave me a headache to write. Further, they must both be enabled for any of them to work, and which ever I use the video is slow, choppy and prone to pausing for no apparent reason. The CPU usage is always pegged to the roof and the sound is often out of synch.

What I'm wondering is whether or not this is the normal situation or if I'm doing something wrong? I've been playing with Ubuntu and have noticed that only one version installs at one time, and the video playback is much better, if still not exactly smooth.

how to keep the scrollbars at the side and bottom of Firefox a contant width? They seem to change with the Full Zoom Level of NoSquint, which is a bit of a pain.

View 5 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Relevant With The Recent Versions Of Firefox Or A Waste Of Time?

Dec 12, 2010

Old? They've been around for a while and I wonder if they're still relevant. The following:

Code:
network.http.pipelining
network.http.pipelining.maxrequests
network.http.proxy.pipelining
And adding a new integer
Code:
nglayout.initialpaint.delay

Still relevant with the recent versions of Firefox or a waste of time?

View 1 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Request For Nvideo Video Cards Versions For Autoplus?

Sep 8, 2011

I am trying to put together a list of nvidia cards with the aim to include the nvidia driver for listed cards in autoplus etc..so what id like is the output oflspci -nn |grep VGA Quote:eg:02:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: nVidia Corporation G86 [GeForce 8500 GT] [10de:0421] (rev a1)Please could you post them here http://dnmouse.org/support/ you dont need/have to put your real name and email anything will do

View 10 Replies View Related

General :: Fedora Repository Not Providing Up-to-date Versions Of Software?

Aug 13, 2010

I am using Linpus lite (a fedora based linux) on an ACER ONE notebook. I use a GUI to install/update or remove software. It is called pirut. I believe it a GUI of the yum command. The repository this install program uses is the fedora one. I find the following description of the repository in the menus of that GUI:
Name: Fedora Description:Fedora 8 - i386 Mirror list : h[URL]... The problem is the following: The versions I can install from that GUI are outdate. For example, the firefox I have is 2.0.0.14 although the newest one available at the firefox website is 3.6.8. The same with openoffice, gcc and many many other tools.

This is embarrassing: I wanted recently to install a software on my own which was not available at that repository. This software requires recent versions of many tools. It's embarassing to have to update them manually..

I assumed the default repository of fedora should have access to the newest versions. If that is true, then the problem is in my system and not in the repositories. In that case, does any one have a clue on how to fix that problem? Now if the repository I use is indeed outdated, Should I change to another repository? Can anyone indicate which repository is compatible with my system and how to add it?

View 6 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Fatal Error: Mismatch Between The Program And Library Build Versions Detected

Apr 13, 2011

I'm tring to run AMDOverdriveCtrl, since they don't have an RPM file for Fedora i tried to compile from source i followed the instruction in the readme files run the make command

Code:

% make
g++ -mwindows -s -pthread -lwx_gtk2u_richtext-2.8 -lwx_gtk2u_aui-2.8 -lwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.8 -lwx_gtk2u_qa-2.8 -lwx_gtk2u_html-2.8 -lwx_gtk2u_adv-2.8 -lwx_gtk2u_core-2.8 -lwx_baseu_xml-2.8 -lwx_baseu_net-2.8 -lwx_baseu-2.8 -ldl -o./Release/AMDOverdriveCtrl ./src/CFanSpeedPanel.o ./src/COvdrSettingsPanel.o ./src/CFanControlPanel.o ./src/CColorTempPanel.o ./src/BezierMath.o ./src/Color.o

[code]....

and tried to run the application, and i get this error message

Code:

$ AMDOverdriveCtrl
Fatal Error: Mismatch between the program and library build versions detected.

The library used 2.8 (no debug,Unicode,compiler with C++ ABI 1002,wx containers,compatible with 2.4,compatible with 2.6), and your program used 2.8 (no debug,Unicode,compiler with C++ ABI 1002,wx containers,compatible with 2.6).

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved