While (attempting) to set up ssh on a couple of machines (not this one) I've noticed that I keep getting some strange unknown ports showing as open on my PC when I do a port scan on its address. They are only opened transiently, they are all high numbers eg 33348, 41147, 50370 etc. I have opened no ports on this machine at any time and ufw is set to deny all incoming.
View 3 RepliesI have a very strange problem for me. In this example dns and IP is hiden for security reason. When I try from putty manager to connect to my Debian and write next command:
[Code]...
does it effective using ClamAV as Privoxy antivirus? I have actually configure it but it does not seem to come into any effect.Why?I test it with Eicar(test virus) online and it does not even prompt there is a problem unless i have scanned.Beside that,i have installed ClamAV daemon along with it. [URL]
[Code]....
Issue :How come the Clam Antivirus does not prompt there is a virus when i opened the file or problem link?Does it work difference as Window OS antivirus which prompt when there is a virus detected?
I have gotten over my inability to add SELinux users and am trying to write an SELinux module on my Fedora 10 machine, standard SELinux distribution. Most of it works just fine, but I've been having strange troubles with some policy interfaces--m4 expands them to numbers rather than valid SELinux policy language. Here's what I'm getting:
seutil_read_config($1_t) ---> 679
seutil_read_src_policy($1_t) ---> 1021
files_search_etc($1_t) ---> 1875
As far as I know all of these are valid policy interfaces (I've checked them up in their respective files, and they do exist and contain what appears to be valid policy). The last one I know because I went into seutil_read_src_policy and put its contents into the module rather than the macro itself. Now, I could do the same with files_search_etc, but really I'd like the top-level macro to just work. Does anyone know what is causing this problem? I'm certain I'm using correct syntax, unless there's a whitespace rule I'm not familiar with.
A secondary problem I have, generating warnings rather than errors, is that for some reason ' s are popping up in my expanded module, right after the end of expansions of some (but not all) macros that I've defined.
After reading a lot about networking and security I decided to check the security of my own ubuntu box. So I went installing Nmap and discovered that port 139 was "open". Since I 'd read how to use ufw I created a deny rule for port 139. After a second scan with Nmap it still said that port 139 was open as shown below.
[Code]...
I'm locking down my laptop. I know I can use a firewall to ensure nothing gets through that I didn't catch, and I certainly plan on using one, but in the meantime, I want to know what exactly is running on my system.
nmap localhost returns:
Code:
james@james-linux:~$ nmap localhost
Starting Nmap 5.00 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2010-07-26 23:33 CDT
Warning: Hostname localhost resolves to 2 IPs. Using 127.0.0.1.
Interesting ports on localhost (127.0.0.1):
Not shown: 994 closed ports
PORT STATE SERVICE
25/tcp open smtp
111/tcp open rpcbind
139/tcp open netbios-ssn
445/tcp open microsoft-ds
631/tcp open ipp
2049/tcp open nfs
Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.18 seconds
However, I know that localhost goes back to the loopback interface, 127.0.0.1. So, to see what was really open, I ran nmap 192.168.0.108, which is my laptop's IP at the moment.
Code:
james@james-linux:~$ nmap 192.168.0.108
Starting Nmap 5.00 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2010-07-26 23:33 CDT
Interesting ports on 192.168.0.108:
Not shown: 996 closed ports
PORT STATE SERVICE
111/tcp open rpcbind
139/tcp open netbios-ssn
445/tcp open microsoft-ds
2049/tcp open nfs
Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.14 seconds
Now if I understand correctly, I can attribute 139 and 445 to my Samba share. That I'm okay with. What I don't know is 111 and 2049. Does anyone know what these ports are, what's running on them, and how I could turn them off, supposing that they are a security risk?
I'm getting heat from the head networking office that ports 21, 110, and 143 are open. I can telnet to those ports from a remote machine (not localhost) and get a prompt. There does not seem to be anything listening on those ports according to netstat. I've tried using iptables to discard all traffic to a from those ports but I can still telnet to them. This is a lucid desktop machine.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI installed Ubuntu 9.10 recently. I heard that there will be no open ports in the system unless I specifically open one. How do I scan to find a open port in my system.
View 9 Replies View Relatedwhen i enable my ufw it completely shuts me out and closed my internet connection. i installed firewall configuraiton interface and through it defined rules to accept incoming internet connections on port 80, i can see the rules are there but when i enable my firewall it just shuts me out completely again.
when i do(with my firewall enabled):
Code:
$ sudo ufw status
it gives me:
Quote:
Status: active
[Code].....
I also messed around with fwbuilder and iptables but since then deleted fwbuilder(besides i just compiled firewall policy and never actually installed it because of errors while trying to install it. Iptables I cleared with:
Code:
$ sudo iptables -F
I know how to forward ports in my router. Now I need to open a port to help with testing a project and no matter what I've tried, every port under 1055 shows up as stealthed (with 1-71 closed) according to Shields Up! I'm happy to run it at a port > 1024, but whatever I try also shows up stealthed. I even tried (briefly) turning on DMZ and still the same thing. My ISP swears that they only block port 80, 21 and 25, none of which I'm trying to use. UFW status reports inactive and I'm not using firestarter. I'm not running any other server (apache, light speed etc). If it's not my router and it's not my ISP, and there's no other server apps running, then that kind of leaves Ubuntu as far as I can see,
View 8 Replies View RelatedIs there anyway i can ssh/rdp/telnet into my server from the outside bypassing comcast ALL blocked ports
View 1 Replies View Relatedhow to block all ports except pop,pop3,smtp in nat using iptables in squid on redhat A3
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhat ports does Firefox use to connect to the Internet?
View 9 Replies View Relatedmy ufw rules have been loaded and active yet using iptraf i see tcp connections on ports that were never allowed by ufw. can anyone explain this too me does ufw just not work?
View 6 Replies View RelatedWhat are the security implications of closed ports?
View 5 Replies View RelatedWhat is happening when I log in to my Ubuntu server machine via ssh and putty. trying to understand everything, primarily securing my server.
I have specified the ssh server to listen on port 5525, and can login without a problem.
When I look at the logs though it says I connected from xxx.xx.xx.xx on port 53602.
What is happening here and why is the logged connection a different port to the one specified in the config file?
i need to shred (or at least do a low/high level format) the drives before giving them to my parents (because they know about undelete and stuff). so, what apps can i use in ubuntu to do this?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have open ports on my computer for vsftpd, pptpd, and I need help to filter this ports because they aper as open ports on internet, and this is pretty risky
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe do NOT support samba on our Unbuntu servers but still zillions of windows machines are constantly trying to connect on the SMB ports. I've added a rule that drops access to destination ports 137-138 and that seems to work. But it creates many many log entries documenting that the packet has been dropped. I've been researching and cannot come up with a way to suppress logging for these drops.
View 4 Replies View Relatedlooking at my router logs i've noticed for the past while a range of source ports from 60000 to about 65000 from my source external ip to destination external ip always on port 80. I have 3 boxes on this network and this only seems to happen when i connect the one laptop. I even reinstalled the distro downloaded from trusted source but the router is still logging this.. netstat -ntulp shows nothing operating in this range. chkrootkit shows nothing.. Was thinking maybe someone was spoofing the external address but it's been happening on network startup for a month now
View 4 Replies View RelatedI enabled ufw yesterday, and am finding log entries like:
Jun 30 13:07:51 xxxx kernel: [15702368.296557] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eth1 OUT= MAC=00:22:19:5e:8f:23:00:0c:db:fc:8b:00:08:00 SRC=xx.xx.xx.xx DST=xx.xx.xx.xx LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=55 ID=47632 PROTO=TCP SPT=58875 DPT=80 WINDOW=65535 RES=0x00 ACK FIN URGP=0
What is puzzling is I did the command: ufw allow 80.
I am trying to configure Bittorando and iptables using Firestarter. I have got it working but am concerned about security holes.
Let me explain.
AIUI, the Bittornado program contacts the "tracker" on various ports which (from the previously blocked connections in Firestarter) ranged from 4664 to 65532. Therefore, currently I have set this range to be open to allow downloads of the torrent.
However, this seems, IMHO, to devalue to point of having a restrictive exit policy for Firestarter since now virtually all ports are open. I can see nothing on the Bittornado client to restrict the outgoing ports although the "listening" (incoming) ports can be restricted.
I would prefer to have my system locked-down so that the minimal number of ports are open to initiate external connections so is there any way to achieve this with Bittornado?
This morning I was looking at the router's log file and noticed a certain IP address was able to gain LAN access on port 2222. That just happens to be the port my SSH server is listening on! A whois search revealed that IP address is in Germany. As soon as I found this out I stopped forwarding all ports to this machine in my router.
how to tell what had happened, what information this person was able to obtain, and if he left any goodies behind that could hurt me? I've read through some of the logs on my computer and haven't been able to find much at all. I did have some personal information on the hard drives, but that information is encrypted. I'm thinking if they were able to get my SSH password then that information probably isn't safe either (assuming they have some of it).
How do you delete ufw rules which you didn't make?
I want to block the FTP ports (20 & 21) but even if I put in DENY rules, it appears that these rules are letting traffic through
Code:
9 400 ACCEPT tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:20
0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 multiport dports 21,20 state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
0 0 ACCEPT udp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 multiport dports 21,20 state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
How do I delete these rules? I've tried.
Code:
sudo ufw delete allow 20
sudo ufw delete proto tcp from any to any 20
but I get "Could not delete non-existent rule".
Since I didn't make those rules I have no idea what OpenBSD's PF syntax (what ufw uses) is for them.
Perhaps it is my misinterpretation of AppArmor, how can it be configured to restrict TCP or UDP traffic to/from specific ports?
The profile "abstractions/nameservice", under the section "# TCP/UDP network access", doesn't seem to lock the application to port 53. What am I missing? Restriction to specific ports is something that systrace can do so I'd expect nothing less from AppArmor.
have tried to close ports 443,80,22 & 23 without success.Does anybody have any idea how to do this. I close them in a terminal and their still opened. I closed them in services and their still open what am I not doing right?
View 14 Replies View RelatedI'm using mint 10 - ubuntu 10 derivative. I'm a programmer with 10 years experience with linux comfortable (but not a genius) with the command line. Adept with vim. My security knowledge is woefully low.
My bandwith usage has gone way up. To make a long story short, I am suspecting an intrusion of some sort on my machine. Currently I'm using a router with wireless turned off. I'm running iftop and the Rx total for today (still high) is showing 333MB.
For starters, I have two questions:
1)What should I be looking for in /var/log?
2)Any recommendations on software that might help here?
Well I'm kinda a paranoid person, and got bored and ran a port scan from 0 to 500000 and turned up some interesting results, I was wondering how I find the programs tied to each open port. Its my computer and I'd like to very well know what programs are needing these ports and for what usage.
View 7 Replies View RelatedQuote:
A year ago I blogged about how hackers managed to hijack hundreds of high-profile websites to make them promote online stores that sold pirated software at about 5-10% of a real cost. They used quite a standard scheme that involved cloaking (making spammy links visible only to search engine crawlers) and conditional redirects (visitors from search engines who clicked on specifically-crafted links on compromised sites got redirected to online stores of software pirates)
Despite of all my warnings, most of those site are still hacked and help sell pirated software and steal credit card numbers. This negligence of site/server administrators encouraged cyber criminals to step even further in abusing reputation and resources of compromised servers. This post will be about one of such steps.
i am having a problem that i would call a bit "important" with my server. so, from last 3 weeks the used space of my hard disk (RAID I) started growing up. i have 2 x 1 tb HDD working on RAID I and i did not install anything those weeks. the space just started changing from 90 GB till 580 GB. now the situation is stable there but i think it's not normal.
the bandwidth usage is low (like 120 gb in 2 months) and i am running 6 counter strike gameservers, a forum, a very little website and some local stuffs... a friend of mine told me that my server could have been hacked but i am afraid it did... some useful informations: when i reboot the server the used space goes down again to ~100 GB and then it starts going up again. i cant really find where all those files are located:
[Code]...