Ubuntu :: RAID5 Error: /dev/sdc1 Is To Small: 0k?

Mar 25, 2011

i've just triede setting up my new raid with 4 discs however it wont let me create the raid?

Running my harddrives through a

Quote:

Promise SATA300 TX4 interface/controller

Thats my create command:

Code:
sudo mdadm --create --verbose /dev/md0 --level=5
raid-devices=4 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1 /dev/sde1 /dev/sdf1
Error msg

Quote:

mdadm: layout defaults to left-symmetric
mdadm: chunk size defaults to 64K
mdadm: /dev/sdc1 is too small: 0K
mdadm: create aborted

if i try and do

Code:
sudo fdisk /dev/sdc
and tjek partitions with
code....

View 1 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Server :: Recreate A Raid5 MD0 Into A Raid5 MD3?

Jan 9, 2010

I have no drive failures but just need to recreate a raid5 set as the next free MD disk number. Originally I built a temp OS of debian on a single drive and had 4x2TB drives in a raid5 software array (MD0) this worked fine and allowed me to move all data to it, and remove our old fileserver. I have now pulled out the 4 x 2TB Raid 5 drives and created a new OS on two new 80GB drives, partioned as follows,

MD0 is now 250mb Raid1 as /boot
MD1 is 4GB Raid1 Swap
MD2 is 76GB Raid1 as /

If I turn off and push back in the 4x2TB drives I cannot see a MD3. I presume I would need to create a MD3 from these 4 drives but I dont want to mess things up as its live data. So im here asking for help, or a bit of hand holding to get it done right.

PS - Its a Debian Lenny 5.0.3 Raid1 fresh install replacing a Debian Lenny 5.0.3 on a single disk.

View 2 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Servers :: Convert Mdadm 6 Disk Raid5 To 5 Disk Raid5?

Jun 30, 2011

I know you can fail and then remove a drive from a RAID5 array. This leaves the array in a degraded state.

How can you remove a drive and convert the array to just a regular, clean array?

View 9 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: /dev/sdc1 Displaying / Contents After 1 Day?

May 11, 2010

I was running 9.10-64, upgraded from 9.04 on a 160GB separate boot drive with a 1TB drive for storage. I had mdadm software RAID on 3 500GB drives. I copied off the contents of the md0 RAID device, formatted from ext3 to ext4, then copied it all back. I operated for several weeks this way with enhanced performance and no issues.note: All drives are on MB SATA-II.I wiped out everything and reloaded the 160GB drive with 10.04-64. I removed dmraid and set up mdadm as before with no immediate problems.

The next day, when I pulled up the contents of the 1TB drive (mapped to /1000), it displayed the contents of the root instead. Curious, I attempted to tunnel down to the /1000 folder from within its own listing of /, and saw no files listed. I proceeded to delete the files in the /1000 folder, whereupon I found that my system became unstable. I must have somehow been deleting files from the root itself.I reloaded again. To check if the SATA connector to the 1TB drive may be somehow suddenly faulty, I reordered the connectors and set up the boot priority in the BIOS to match the new configuration. The next morning, I was once again able to see the contents of / when ls'ing /1000. I carefully checked the entry in fstab, the fdisk -l output, and made sure that the directory wasn't somehow showing as a link.

For the next attempt I decided to take ext4 and mdadm completely out of the equation, hoping it was a bug with some combination of the two under the new kernel or something else which could be corrected by replacing the software RAID with a physical controller at a later date. Instead of RAID, I simply formatted each of the 500's as ext3 and mapped them to /500-1 through /500-3 respectively. However, after a day of normal operation, I am now able to see the contents of / when I ls /500-3. The other 4 drives appear to continue operating normally.I have been unable to pull up a similar post prior to creating this one. Perhaps I don't know how to properly search for this issue. If anyone has seen something similar, please link me to the solution.

View 2 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Servers :: /dev/sdc1 Will Be Checked For Errors At Next Reboot

Feb 14, 2011

Everytime i log into my server, I get the message Displayed "/dev/sdc1 will be checked for errors at next reboot"

However, despite many reboots this message does not clear.

I cannot run FSCK on this partition as it is the boot partition.

I would like the device to get checked at reboot, any ideas how I can trigger this check , and that might clear the message

View 5 Replies View Related

Red Hat / Fedora :: F14 - Installation In External USB Drive - Put MBR In Sdc Instead Of Sdc1?

Nov 3, 2010

Installing in external drive at the point where to put the GRUB loader I have these choices :

1. Master Boot Record (MBR) at -dev/sda (internal HDD)

2. First Sector of boot partition - dev/sdc1 (external USB HDD)

How can I put MBR in sdc instead of sdc1?

View 2 Replies View Related

General :: How To Re-sync Disks (/dev/sdc1, /dev/sdc3, Etc)

Sep 29, 2010

Blank USB flash drive = /dev/sdc

#dd if=image_with_2_partitions.img of=/dev/sdc
#ls /dev/sd*
only shows "/dev/sdc"

How do I appear /dev/sdc1 and /dev/sdb2 WITHOUT unplugging and plugging back in the USB drive?

View 1 Replies View Related

Programming :: Proofread Prompt / Small Error Can't Find?

Jun 1, 2011

I've set the following as my prompt:... can't post the string due to the 15 post rule. how helpful....

Everything looks fine initially.
1- It sets the username and host in back on green text.
2- It then changes to an off-white an prints the command number for the terminal.
3- Next, it prints the working directory.
4- Finally is prints a ">" character and a space. it looks like this (hostname/un edited & image enlarged slightly to make it easier to read.)

The problem occurs when I try to "up arrow" to reuse and/or edit a prior command. It prints the prior command fine, but if I arrow over to edit the command sometimes the first character can not be deleted from displaying

I'd love to post 2 screen-shots I took to show the problem but.. 15 posts?

View 1 Replies View Related

General :: Damn Small Error: Mounting Cd-rom & Floppy (probably Also Usb)?

Jan 15, 2010

hi: I just installed damn small linux on a Dell 233 Pentium w/ Toshiba CD-ROM XM 6102B, it works fine except for mounting CD's & Floppies (and I assume, although I haven't tried USB-Drives)

when logged in as root, and typing in
mount dev/cdrom
w/ a cd in a the drive
the answer is
no medium found

when using X mount floppy command,
w/ a floppy in the drive, I get:
Error: mount: relocation error: mount: undefined symbol: blkid_known_fstype

also, my cd-rom drive won't stay closed, which is really annoying,

View 14 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Boot Stops At Splash Screen Waiting For Sdc1 10.04 / Undo It?

Jun 6, 2010

I recently installed Ubuntu 10.04. I'm trying to become familiar with the file system. I noticed my MP3 player (USB) is not mounted automatically when I plug it into the USB cable. I searched Google to find out how to auto mount this device and it worked. However, I didn't give this enough thought to what I was doing I guess. Now if the MP3 player is not connected to the USB cable the boot process stops at the splash screen waiting for the device. The window on the screen states the following:

The disk drive for /media/sdc1/ is not ready or not present. Continue to wait or press S to skip mounting or M to manual recovery.

I don't remember what I did to start this whole mess so I don't know how to undo it? Could someone please help me undo this? I would like the device to auto mount ONLY if it's plugged in if this is possible.

View 15 Replies View Related

General :: Failed To Mount '/dev/sdc1': Permission Denied

Aug 5, 2011

Quote:

Error mounting: mount exited with exit code 1: helper failed with:
Error opening '/dev/sdc1': Permission denied
Failed to mount '/dev/sdc1': Permission denied

[code]....

How do I get past this error?

View 1 Replies View Related

Programming :: Run Small Shell Script - Bash - Syntax Error Near Unexpected Token `('

Jul 9, 2010

I was trying to run small shell script, but could not run. I got the error like in subject.

This is exact way i was trying to do.

View 6 Replies View Related

Hardware :: External HDD - "/dev/sdc1 Is Not A Block Device"

Dec 25, 2010

I have an external WD drive (model WD800B015) that works fine under Windows. When I try to mount it under Slack 12.2 (kernel 2.6.27.7-smp), I get a message saying "/dev/sdc1 is not a block device." WD categorically does not support Linux. A google search has not produced any useful results.

View 7 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: 9TB RAID5 Only Showing 4.1TB?

May 23, 2011

I have created a 9TB raid from 4 1.5TB drives and 3 2TB drives (1.6 and .4 partition). I thought it would be a 9TB partition, and Ubuntu says it is a 9TB partition except when looking at what drive space is left.Nautilus' Properties and System Monitor both say that the raid is 4.1TB with 1TB free but Disk Utility and Nautilus say it is a 9TB RAID. very odd. I have tried checking the raid and the xfs file system. no errors.here is from watch cat /proc/mdstat

Code:
md1 : active raid5 sdg1[5] sdf1[6] sde1[4] sda[0] sdd[3] sdb[2] sdc[1]
8790830976 blocks level 5, 4k chunk, algorithm 2 [7/7] [UUUUUUU]

[code]....

View 9 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Servers :: Create A Raid5 With The Three New 1.5TB HD's?

Apr 15, 2010

Here is what I have and what I want to do.

3 new 1.5TB HD. 1 used 1.5TB hd with 980MB of data. I want to set up a raid 5 with a hot spare. I have music, pictures, videos, and movies (About 2.8TB worth). I have had a mismatch of drives previously, 250GB, 2 320GB, 500GB, 2 1TB and now a 1.5TB all with data. I have removed the one 250 and 2 320s and put the data on the 1.5TB that is currently installed.

What I would like to do is create a raid5 with the three new 1.5TB HD's, copy the data over from the currently installed 1.5TB and then grow or add that drive as a hot spare. Or just add it and then add another 1.5TB down the road as a hot spare don't know for sure.

In addition since I have 2 1 TB drives, I could add 2 more (Good deals on 1 TB drives right now) and have a total of 4 1TB drives. Could I have 2 raid5's (4-1TB's and 4-1.5TB's)in two separate arrays? I really do not know if that makes sense or not but here comes LVM. I am tired of managing my HD space and since i have multiple folders (Movies, music, pictures, videos) and within the movies folder I have R, G & PG folders for the ratings of the movies. (Pwd protect the R so the kids can't get to it) So with LVM installed with the Raid5 I should be able to create my folders and just keep adding data and not worry about moving folders around when I grow the storage by adding new drives. Is that correct? Maybe someone could point me to a how to.

Also, if I create 2 arrays (And I need to know so I can order the 2 additional 1TB drives), then I could put all the music, G and PG content on the one array and all the R and spicy stuff on the other and password protect it.

View 4 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Can't Add A New Disk To A RAID5 Array

Jun 10, 2011

I am trying to build a new array after adjusting TLER on my disks, which permanently changed some of the drives sizes. I am not sure if the following inconsistencies are related to the newly mismatched drive sizes.

Using:

Code:
mdadm --create --auto=md --verbose --chunk=64 --level=5 --raid-devices=4 /dev/md1 /dev/sdd /dev/sde /dev/sdf /dev/sdg
Nets me (build-time was two full days):

[Code]....

On a side note, since I'm recreating my array from scratch, I was wondering if anyone here knows of any optimized settings I could use. I've got 3Tb of data to transfer, so lots of test material.

These are Western Digital First Generation 2TB Green Drives (WD20EADS-00R6B0) with WDidle3 fix applied & TLER=ON. These are pre Advanced Format (aka not 4K).

Code:
mkfs.ext4 -E stripe-width=48,stride=16 /dev/md1

View 9 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Unmountable LuksContainer After RAID5 Resize

Jan 8, 2010

I used a raid 5 of 5*1TB via Kernel raid on md0. I then created a luks out of md0 -> /dev/mapper/md0. I formatted ext3 this container. That worked fine. Now I baught another Harddrive and grew the raid to now 6 Devices. The Raid is now running und bigger than before - great. The luksOpen still works BUT I can't mount the ext3 on it. It seems like the luks Volume also grew, it's now 1TB bigger without doing anything. The Problem: I can't mount the luks anymore, mapping it was no big deal so.. Always tells me that I should specify the filesystem type:

Code:
root@ubuntu:/home/ubuntu# mount /dev/mapper/md0 /mnt/tmp
mount: Sie missen den Dateisystemtyp angeben

If I do is then it continues to give me errors:
Code:
root@ubuntu:/home/ubuntu# mount /dev/mapper/md0 /mnt/tmp -t ext3
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/mapper/md0,
missing codepage or helper program, or other error
Manchmal liefert das Syslog wertvolle Informationen - versuchen
Sie dmesg | tail oder so

It seems as if the luks system doesnt know that the luks container isn't using the whole drive.

View 2 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Servers :: Software Raid5 - Very Low Performance?

Mar 5, 2010

I recently installed a new home backup server with Ubuntu 9.10 x86_64 using the alternate CD. I used the CD's installer to partition my disk and created a software RAID 5 array on 4 disks with no spares. The root file system is located outside the raid array.

At first the array performed nicely but as it started to fill up, the io performance dropped significantly to the point where I get a transfer rate of 1-2MB/s when writing!

[Code]...

View 9 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Servers :: Mdadm Raid5 Keeps Degrading?

May 3, 2010

Created my own file server/nas, but get stuck in a problem after couple of months. I have a server with 4x 1,5tb disks, all connected to sata ports and 1 40gb ata133 disk running ubuntu 9.10 x64 amd. I've created a raid5 array using mdadm. It all worked great for couple of months but lately the raid5 array is degraded. disk sdd1 is faulting every few days. I have checked the drive but it is fine. If I re-add the disk and wait for 6 hours my raid5 array is all fine again, but after a few shutdowns, it is degraded.

my mdadm detail:

Quote:

root@ubuntu: sudo mdadm --detail /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
Version : 00.90
Creation Time : Mon Dec 14 13:00:43 2009
Raid Level : raid5

[Code].....

View 9 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Servers :: Slow Raid5 Using Mdadm?

Nov 2, 2010

I have ubuntu server 10.04 on a server with 2.8ghz 1gb ddr2 with the os on a 2gb cf card attached to the IDE channel and a software raid5 with 4 x 750gb drives. On a samba share using these drives I am only getting around 5 MB/s connected via wireless N at 216mbps and my router and server both having gigabit ports. Is a raid 5 supposed to be that slow? I was seeing speeds of anywhere from 20-50MB/s from other people and am just wondering what i am doing wrong to be so far below that.

View 4 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Difficulties Building RAID5 Under 10.10 64bit

Dec 31, 2010

I recently went shopping at newegg for components for a new home server to fulfill multiple needs--chief amongst them to replace an aging old Athlon box which has been running a 4TB software raid for years now So I ordered an ASUS P7P55D-E LX mobo, 8GB DDR2, a core i5 quad-core, and 6 WD "green" 2TB drives (I'm more concerned with capacity than speed). I got it all assembled, using a 500GB 2.5" drive as the boot / host drive, a blu-ray reader, and splitting the 2TB drives amongst the 2 controllers (4 on the remaining ports of the x6 SATA controller and 2 on the x2 SATA-III controller, just not needing the SATA III capabilities). I plan to use Software RAID5 rather than the fakeraid that might be supported by the chipset. This affords maximum portability for the future.

At any rate, I installed 10.10 64-bit (Desktop), let it update, then installed mdadm and set about configuring the RAID5. I decided to use the nifty graphical tool. Last time I did this on my old Fedora box, it was all CLI.All seemed to be going well, and I was letting it fully recover / synchronize before setting up a filesystem (planning on ext4 this time). I kept an eye on it with cat /proc/mdstat.

After 20 hrs (averaging 25MB/sec on the sync...seems a bit slow, but who knows?)...it finishes and the RAID is immediately degraded with one volume (/dev/sdc1) marked as faulty and another volume marked as a spare. I replaced the SATA cables with brand new ones as long ago I ran into an issue like this due to a bad cable. Before trying again I ran the extensive SMART test and a read/write benchmark on each drive. They all checked out fine. So I started over and 20hrs later, same thing.So I shut down and removed the offending drive and started with only 5 drives. Another 19hrs go by and this one turns up /dev/sde1 faulty and another drive marked as a spare. That drive was fine before, and is on a different controller from the one that it was finding as faulty before.

Now I am suspicious that there is a larger underlying issue and that the drives are not bad at all. Should I have just gone with a 32-bit + PAE install? Does the 64-bit have known issues with the software RAID? Should I have just built it using the CLI? Looking online, it seems people are having success with the GUI tool. I don't think it is the GUI tool. Checking with mdadm, it seems everything is being configured right.

View 2 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Raid5 And Static Device Names?

May 17, 2011

I am setting up a Raid5 and torture testing it. I added two eSata ports to my machine. When a drive is installed in that eSata port and the machine then booted up the device name (e.g. /dev/sdc) is inserted in the middle of my Raid devices. And that is just one example of how the device names can change.I did a search on 'static device names' but I saw nothing directly related to Raid. What I did see were suggestions to create udev rules based on UUID. But that was for single disks, not Raid, where each drive/partition in the raid array appears to have the same UUID.I'm surprised this does not come up in the various Raid howtos because it is impossible to keep a Raid array intact without solving this problem unless the machine is never touched thereafter.

View 1 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Extend Raid5 Array With One Disk

Mar 6, 2011

I wanted to extend my raid array with one disk, but I made a major error. I forgot partition the new disk to utilize the full 640GB. I used the following commands to extend the array:

Code:
mdadm --add /dev/md0 /dev/sdf
mdadm --grow --raid-devices=6 /dev/md0
xfs_growfs /dev/md0

After noticing that something was wrong I used these commands to remove the new disk:

[Code]....

How can I repair this situation? Before starting this adventure I made a back-up of everything that was stored in the raid array.

View 1 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Reshaping RAID5 Array To RAID6?

May 30, 2011

I am running lucid and have a 4+1(spare) RAID5 array made up of 1TB disks. I upgraded my mdadm to version 3.1.4 and then performed the following operation:

$sudo mdadm --grow /dev/md3 --level=6 --read-device=5 --backup-file=/var/lib/mysql/md3backup

I have a 500GB drive mounted at /var/lib/mysql which is mostly empty and not part of any RAID array.The reshaping started and everything looked OK. The access lights on the 5 drives were all coming on at the same time on a regular basis. The status from /proc/mdstat showed the array being reshaped to RAID6, albeit slowly. The status showed an average speed of 4000KB and an estimated completion time of 4000 minutes. This all seemed reasonable. This was performed in late afternoon.

The next morning I checked the status and the average speed was down to 300->400KB and the estimated time to complete was 40,000 minutes. When I look at the drive lights, I have one drive whose access light is on solid and the other four drives come on intermittently. Running iotop doesn't show anything useful. mdadm and kjournal show up occasionally. The same is true for top (running on an i5 2500K Intel processor). Here is the output of cat /proc/mdstat:

Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [raid10]
md2 : active raid1 sde3[4](S) sda3[3] sdc3[1] sdd3[2] sdb3[0]
987904 blocks [4/4] [UUUU]

[code]....

My biggest concern is keeping this system running for 20+ days without any hiccups.

View 1 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Servers :: Hardware Requirements For (software) RAID5?

Mar 18, 2010

I've built a server with (intentionally) very low-power components. The motherboard uses a Via C3 CPU running at 700MHz. The server has 512MB of RAM and I'm running 8.04 Server Edition (no GUI). This is purely a file server - not a lot of daemons started (except the defaults) -- no web server, etc. Just NFS, Samba and Open SSH (for remote administration). I'm not sure how much free RAM it has (it's down at the moment).

Is the RAM/CPU going to be inadequate for running software RAID5? I've done some big rsyncs and even without RAID, this thing is pretty slow. I'm not terribly concerned about the write speed, but if the read performance is going to be inadequate for playing (not streaming - just playing) a 720p MKV movie over my LAN, then I need to rethink this.

View 2 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Lucid Upgrade Killed Raid5 Md Array?

Jun 7, 2010

I'm a bit sick to my stomach right now. I had a raid5 array (5x1.5TB drives) and I upgraded to lucid and now the array no longer works. Initially, on boot, it would try to mount it from fstab and that failed consistently as it wasn't assembling it.

then I tried to assemble it by hand (--scan) and that seemed to cause it to mount degraded (it seems md in the process tried to use on of the disks for something else!), but when I look at its partition table, it's empty. pretty pissed at the moment (somewhat at myself, didn't really need to upgrade), any ideas what went wrong?

View 2 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Mdadm RAID5 Array Wont Start?

Jul 27, 2010

after a failed upgrade from 9.10 to 10.04 I had to format my computer and do a clean install of 10.04, and now my mdadm raid5 array wont start.my array is called "The Library", and i believe the space between "The" and "Library" is causing the command disk utility uses to start the array to fail.The exact error isAn error occurred while performing an operation on "The Library" (RAID-5 Array): The operation failed

Error assembling array: mdadm exited with exit code 1: mdadm: unrecognised word on ARRAY line: Library
mdadm: unrecognised word on ARRAY line: Library

[code]....

View 1 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Rebuilding RAID5 Array From Failed Appliance?

Sep 16, 2010

This isn't exactly Ubuntu specific, but I do plan on using Ubuntu to try to recover this array. I've been using a Freedom9 freestor 4020 for the past few years and other than it totally blowing up last week it's been pretty good. I was on vacation for almost a month and a few days after I returned my NAS (freestor 4020) started acting up. I tried a few power cycles, but was dismayed to see that I could not log in via browser or SSH (SMB shares were no accessible either). A drive failure light is supposed to illuminate if a disk fails, but no dice.

I plugged all 4 drives from the NAS into an Ubutnu 9.04 Desktop system and one started throwing out all kinds of errors. Thinking that it would be a simple rebuild, I went to my local computer shop and picked up another 500GB drive (same manufacturer/part #), replaced the failed drive, and powered up the NAS again... Nothing. I left it for 12 hours then powered it down, plugged the new drive into my linux box again to see if it rebuilt... the drive was a virgin. What gives me hope that I can still recover the data is Ubuntu sees "RAID components" on the drives (through disk manager and parted), and gives me the option of initializing the array.

My plan of attack is to plug all of the drives back into my Ubuntu box, initialize the RAID array via LVM, and pretty much hope for the best. The data is not uber critical, but it would be a pretty big pain in the behind to rip/upload all the software that was on it (ripping hundreds of DVD/CD images is not fun). If my Ubuntu box can make sense of this newly initialized/mounted RAID set... I'll plug in a 2TB external drive, copy the data over, and rebuild the NAS from scratch, then put my data back on (perhaps a different unit, or something running openfiler).

View 2 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Servers :: Replacing A Failed RAID5 Drive?

Dec 7, 2010

As the title says, I have a failed RAID5 hard drive. What's the easiest way I can go by replacing it? I've seen many ways to do this, but I would like to know what other people are saying about this, and see how you would do it.

P.S. This is the one I found. [URL]

View 3 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Servers :: Growing Software RAID5 With MDADM

May 13, 2011

My fileserver initially had 3 1TB drives in RAID 5 configured with mdadm as /dev/md1. (System root is a mirrored raid on /dev/md0) I went to go add a 4th 1TB drive to /dev/md1 and grow the raid 5 accordingly. I was initially following this guide: [URL] but ran into issues on the 3rd and 4th commands. I've been trying a few things to remedy the issue since, but no luck. The drive seems to have been added to /dev/md1 properly, but I can't get the filesystem to resize to 3TB. I also am not entirely sure how /dev/md1p1 got created, but it appears to be the primary partition on the logical device /dev/md1.
Relevent information:

Code:
fdisk -l /dev/md1
Disk /dev/md1: 3000.6 GB, 3000606523392 bytes
2 heads, 4 sectors/track, 732569952 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 8 * 512 = 4096 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 65536 bytes / 196608 bytes
Disk identifier: 0xda4939fa .....

The filesystem originated as ext3, I believe its showing up as ext2 in some of these results because I disabled the journal when doing some initial troubleshooting. Not sure what the issue is, but I didn't want to blindly perform operations on the filesystem and risk losing my data.

View 9 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved