Security :: Centos 5.5 / Rkhunter Result In Logwatch Mail
Apr 20, 2011
I have a server, running Centos 5.5. It runs daily rkhunter and logwatch. From both I get a daily mail.
I have a desktop computer, running Fedora 13 (almost 14...). It runs also a daily rkhunter and logwatch. But I get ONE mail from logwatch, which contains the result of rkhunter.
On the server, I want also only mail from logwatch, containing the rkhunter results. But so far, no luck.
How can I get the rkhunter results in the logwatch mail on my Centos server?
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Nov 4, 2009
My ISP blocks outgoing email if it does not login properly with a valid account. I successfully configured sendmail to use SMART_HOST and confAUTH_OPTIONS with confAUTH_MECHANISM set to LOGIN PLAIN.
It successfully sends email because I tested it with evolution sending through 127.0.0.1, but I need to specify myacount@mydomain.com as the email address for root.
But it doesn't work for logwatch because it sends as from root@localhost.localdomain, and my ISP's smtp server rejects it. The message I get back in root@localhost account is the following:
----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to smtp.mydomain.com.:
>>> MAIL From:<root@localhost.localdomain> SIZE=581 AUTH=<>
<<< 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender
554 5.0.0 Service unavailable
I thought that I should masquerade all emails from this domain, so I configured sendmail as specified in [1] section "24.3.1.4. Masquerading", but it doesn't work. It seems that masquerading in sendmail is broken or something is wrong in the documentation.
[1] [URL]
I have sendmail 8.13.8-2 and centos-release-5-4.el5.centos.1.
Is there a way to specify the "From:myacount@mydomain.com" in logwatch ? or Is there a way to make it work the masquerading in sendmail so I can masquerade everything as coming from a specific account?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 11, 2009
I am receving emails from logwatch but when I setup my own mail script using mutt, the script succeeds but no email is received.Any ideas what the difference is between the two mail methods?
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jun 8, 2010
I'm trying to get logwatch to email me. I think my logwatch.conf file is okay. I have postfix installed. The mailer as far as I can tell is set correctly ("usr/bin/mail"). When I run logwatch - I get "no mail for aubrey"
Heres my logwatch.conf file:
Code:
linux-qwkb:/home/aubrey # edit /usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/logwatch.conf
########################################################
# This was written and is maintained by:
# Kirk Bauer <kirk@kaybee.org>
#
# Please send all comments, suggestions, bug reports,
# etc, to kirk@kaybee.org.
#
######################################################## .....
View 13 Replies
View Related
Feb 28, 2011
We have following setup,
1. Webserver (Centos 5.5)
2. Mail server (Centos 5.5)
We have configured autossh successfully to create/manage the ssh tunnel into mail server in order to dump all emails to localhost port.
To auto start autossh in boot time we have included following into /etc/rc.d/rc.local,
Quote:
So whenever our web application wants to send out emails it dump all emails to localhost:33465 port, easy piecy, all are working great
Now we have a requirement that logwatch reports should get delivered via the same ssh tunnel rather than installing postfix and configuring as a relay.
In logwatch is there a way to achieve that?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 4, 2010
how to configure Logwatch? where can I find its config file? I never configure it but I received email everyday from Logwatch@mydomain.com..
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 11, 2011
You should be running a firewall. I would also periodically check for rootkits with rkhunter and chkrootkit. Antivirus is usually optional, but it depends on your network ... if you have Window$ machines, do use clamav or something.Hope I'm not distorting the thread but just ran rkhunter and got a lot of red warnings, especially worrying seems:
Quote:
Applications checks...
Applications checked: 4
Suspect applications: 3
View 11 Replies
View Related
Nov 28, 2010
According to the rkhunter home page, rkhunter is tested on Slackware up to version 10.1. Does this mean it is not useful on Slackware 13.1?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 14, 2010
What the best method is for checking for rootkits? I have heard that it is best not to install and run these programs on the distro itself. Would it be possible to install them on another distro/partition and then use them to check for rootkits on my main partition/distro (Ubuntu)?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jul 13, 2011
Just I install the rkhunter tool via apt-get install rkhunter. When I had run the rkhunter check, rkhunter comes with a warning about "GasKit Rootkit", i dont understand what it is
This server is install new last and maby 1 week old, so i don't understand why this happends.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 5, 2010
I have just been checking one of my machines with rkhunter and got the following result:
Code:
[17:50:08] Warning: Checking for possible rootkit strings [ Warning ]
[17:50:09] Found string 'hdparm' in file '/etc/init.d/checkroot.sh'. Possible rootkit: Xzibit Rootkit
[17:50:09] Found string 'hdparm' in file '/etc/init.d/bootlogd'. Possible rootkit: Xzibit Rootkit
Using a well known search engine shows that others have come across this before: [URL] I have installed the current version of rkhunter from Debian's Unstable repo,but i still have the same result as above. I now check the rkhunter wiki,which mentions the same problem: [URL]
Quote: Here is an example on my system to remove a false positive for a certain rootkit that hit hdparm.
[Code]....
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2010
Is this a false positive from rkhunter?
/usr/bin/curl [ Warning ]
/usr/bin/ldd [ Warning ]
Chkrootkit came back ok. Running ClamAV and will only add that here if it finds anything. I just neve remember seeing these before. This is in Ubuntu 10.10
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 23, 2010
Last night I received the classic rkhunter's email with several warnings inside:
Quote:
Warning:
Warning:
Warning:
and so on..
Why rkhunter isn't able to calculate the hash of those files and compare it with the stored one?
Other strange thing: for the "good" file, the hash is often different!
For example, in the last rkhunter.log, /bin/awk is "good".
But:
Quote:
Quote:
So, if the sha1sum is different, why rkhunter tell me that awk is secure?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 11, 2010
I was advised by a fellow forum owner to install logwatch as a security precaution. Our forum runs on a dedicated server. CentOS 5.5. I ran "yum install logwatch" and got the following:
Code:
Examining logwatch-7.3.6-1.noarch.rpm: logwatch-7.3.6-1.noarch
Marking logwatch-7.3.6-1.noarch.rpm to be installed
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package logwatch.noarch 0:7.3.6-1 set to be updated
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
[Code]...
View 15 Replies
View Related
Mar 17, 2011
i get this warning from selinux :
"SELinux is preventing /bin/mailx from append access on the file /var/lib/rkhunter/rkhcronlog.OmRFCZOynG."
I tried to fix it by "# /sbin/restorecon -v /var/lib/rkhunter/rkhcronlog.OmRFCZOynG" as suggested by SELinux but it comes back with another warning, but with a different /rkhcronlog.xxxxxxxxx...
i think its just a way of rkhunter logging issue -. attached here is the actual error message by selinux.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Oct 6, 2010
I've got rkhunter installed and regularly do scans immediately before & after updates & if I get warnings about 'file property updates' after the update I use 'rkhunter --propupd' to give me a clean run.I'm about to setup a ubuntu computer for my nan, I want to enable automatic security updates so she doesn't have to do anything to keep her system secure. I was planning on running rkhunter when I go to her house (about once a month) and check the dates in the resulting rkhunter.log warnings with those in the var/log/apt/history.log to see if legitimate updates caused any rkhunter warnings. I've noticed though that the 'Current file modifiation time:' in the rkhunter.log warnings are incorrect.
My system seems to be about 15 days behind the actual date, I've now run rkhunter --propupd so I have no warnings but got this one off another forum post to show what I mean:
Current file modification time: 1283341157 (01-Sep-2010 06:39:17)
I believe that the '1283341157' is the time in some strange format and the date in brackets is what rkhunter thinks it might be in human format.
1) How to interpret the 'strange date format' (1283341157 in the line above)?
2) If there's a way of configuring the date in rkhunter so that they're correct in rkhunter.log?
3) If there's a better way of keeping her system up-to-date & secure, it's her first computer & she's 86 so I think setting up automatic security updates is the way to go, it'll be one less thing to overwhelm her!
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 1, 2011
When I scanned my Ubuntu 10.04 with rkhunter a root kit hunter toolkit, it gave following warning:
Is there something that I have to worry about.
Code:
View 7 Replies
View Related
Feb 16, 2011
Let's say you have a host with some kind of locally installed root kit detector/scanner.
If someone managed to get root access to that box. Wouldn't the first thing to do, before installing a root kit, be to remove any kind root kit detector?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 10, 2010
I got this warning in the log of rkhunter:Quote:
Checking /dev for suspicious file types [ Warning ]
[13:37:16] Warning: Suspicious file types found in /dev:
[13:37:16] /dev/shm/pulse-shm-43136623: data
[code]....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 15, 2011
I have set logwatch to report daily the logs, somehow since last week i get below message. A total of 1 possible successful probes were detected (the following URLs contain strings that match one or more of a listing of strings that indicate a possible exploit):
/cgi-bin/blocked.cgi?clientaddr=192.168.1.108&clientname=&clientident=&clientgroup=limitedaccess&targetclass= untrusted&url=http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/fm/9608-84171-8772-2?
[code]...
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jun 4, 2009
why I can't open this file.
[root@localhost fedora]# gedit /etc/var/log/rkhunter/rkhunter.log No protocol specified (gedit:24869): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: :0.0 [root@localhost fedora]# gedit /var/log/rkhunter/rkhunter.log No protocol specified
There is absolutely no reason why it can't be opened. I opened it just fine earlier and now it won't open up for inspection.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jun 15, 2011
I had been receiving a rkhunter warning on my Fedora 14 server for quite some time now. Attempts to fix the error via information from Google searches have failed. I decided to have a look at bugzilla and what do you know, a fix. The warning:
Quote:
[03:29:08] Warning: The SSH and rkhunter configuration options should be the same:
Warning: The SSH and rkhunter configuration options should be the same:
The fix, according to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596775 is to change
PHP Code:
ALLOW_SSH_PROT_V1=2
to
PHP Code:
ALLOW_SSH_PROT_V1=0
I made the change and ran rkhunter again. No more error. I know everyone was wondering about this.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 1, 2010
I have been running rkhunter but how do i view the /var/log/rkhunter.log? I have tried using: sudo /var/log/rkhunter.log but all i got was "Command not found?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2010
Rkhunter file properties changed
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 8, 2010
I recently ran a rkhunter check and in my log i have found some very odd (to me at least) reports.
/usr/bin/last [ Warning ]
Warning: The file properties have changed:
File: /usr/bin/last
[code]....
View 9 Replies
View Related
Mar 8, 2010
Something really nasty happened to my Arch Linux just now and I don't know why. I was switching through Xfwm4 themes when suddenly Kate crashed and brought down X with it. I started X back up, and Xfwm got hung up, I had to switch to another VT and run "killall X". I tried replacing xfwm4 with pekwm (but still with xfce4-panel) in .xinitrc, same thing. I deleted all my Xfce config files and tried again. The mouse didn't even move. The keyboard didn't work, not even the keyboard light would come on and I couldn't switch to another VT. I was forced to use the Reset button and hope it wouldn't ruin my hard drive.
It booted up fine, I purged all xfce4-related packages just in case while still in CLI mode, and I ran "xinit /usr/bin/pekwm" and I got into a working GUI. I closed a window and X froze again! The window's close button just stayed presses after I let go of it! I killed X from another VT. So I installed and ran "rkhunter" form AUR (I wonder why they don't have it in the arch repos, it's so much better that chkrootkit) and it warned that I might have Adore Rootkit. What should I do? If it helps, I recently installed a few packages from the Arch Linux AUR, including "ooc-git", "ooc-gtksourceview-git", "libpng12", and "virtualbox_bin".
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 14, 2010
I'm not concerned about this since this traffic is generated from the loopback address, but would like to find out what it is.
[code]...
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 29, 2009
I like to keep top/htop running rkhunter showed up randomly. I didn't launch this. f11, 2 day old install, fully updated.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 22, 2011
Like Jackp27, I am reacting to a transient warning from rkhunter, indicating a possible LKM trojan, which may or may not be a false positive. Running chkrootkit and rkhunter repeatedly, including older versions running under live CDs like INSERT, indicated nothing wrong, but two runs of rkhunter running under the possibly compromised system itself did seem to suggest rkhunter thought it might have found elements of trojan code in RAM.
Like Jackp27, I can't give details right now because I do not currently have access to my logs, but I did find one webpage (can't give link because I do not currently have access to my detailed notes) suggesting that rkhunter may have thought it found a signature of the adore trojan in RAM by looking at /proc/kallsymms which is not a file I ordinary look at. I did look at it very closely yesterday, repeatedly, and it seems to be mostly empty, but occasionaly seems to contain what might be a sequence of calls to various kernel modules--- right now I only recall that some had the form ??_guest_? and that x_tables might be involved.
Can anyone give me a rough indication of what /proc/kallsymms is supposed to do, whether it should normally be empty, and when it is not, what kind of lines are supposed to show up in that "file" when I cat it? I also saw something about ?_logdrop? which may have had something to do with with rotating logs (I rebooted several times) rather than a trojan keylogger. But maybe some trojans rotate logs to try to hide their presence?
I know I am not giving enough information--- I hope to come back later with more details after I have managed to access my logs and notes, so feel free to say what kind of details would be most helpful in helping me decide whether or not this was a false positive.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Aug 31, 2010
When I installed Cent before I got my logwatch messages sent to me. for somreason this new server I built I am not getting them. can mail off the server and there is no mail in the Q or in root. I also put in a .forward file in my root to mail to my external account and it works fine. I get mail from fail2ban and denyhosts but not the logwatch.Thoughts on what I could be missing? I check the link and the files are all there. I changed the config file to give me a High level of detail. Thats about it. If I use the command line for logwatch it sends mail fine. logwatch --detail high --logfile messages --mailto yourname@domain.com
View 6 Replies
View Related
