Networking :: Routing Incoming Traffic To NAT'ed VM On A Hired Dedicated Server?

May 21, 2010

I have set up a Virtual machine on a dedicated server from 1and1. I hoped to use a bridge to give the vm direct access to the internet but 1and1 do mac filtering and so the only option is to use NAT.

I used Virtual Machine Manager on my Ubuntu 10.04 machine at home to install Debain Lenny on the vm on the server using KVM and all went well. I put it on a virtual network 192.168.100.0 and i can access it from the host and i can access the internet from the guest using NAT that libvirt set-up.

I bought another ip address from 1and1 with the hope of forwarding packets to the new ip address 11.22.33.02 to the guest vm.

I have tried all sorts of routing rules using iptables without any success.

my virtual network is on virbr1 the guest ip is 192.168.100.50 my external network device is ip say 11.22.33.01 on eth0 with the secondary ip say 11.22.33.02 on eth0:1

Here are the latest rules i tried:

Quote:

iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -d 11.22.33.02 -i eth0 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.100.50
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.100.50 -o eth0 -j SNAT --to-source 11.22.33.02
iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -i eth0 -o virbr1 -d 192.168.100.50 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
iptables -A FORWARD -t filter -i eth0 -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT

[Code].....

View 2 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Ubuntu Networking :: Loads Of Incoming UDP Traffic?

Jun 29, 2011

My laptop has become very sluggish. So I loaded firestarter firewall. It is reporting loads of incoming UDP traffic. I only use this machine for Skype and Firefox based work as most of my stuff is kept on the cloud. Is it safe to stop all this UDP traffic? It would free up my CPU I guess. It seems port 56095 is getting hammered.

View 8 Replies View Related

Fedora Networking :: VLAN Not Recognizing Incoming Traffic?

May 29, 2011

Before explaining the problem, I have to draw the environment. Because of post size limitations, I'll have to break this post in more than one entry.

Physical view

Code:
+--------+ +---+
|storage1|-----| |
+--------+ | s |
| w |
+--------+ | i | +-------+
|router2 |-----| t |-----|router1|--->Internet
+--------+ | c | +-------+
| h |
+--------+ | 8 |
|router3 |-----| |
+--------+ +---+
Device details

[Code]....

View 14 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Networking :: Randomly Blocks Incoming Traffic?

Aug 5, 2010

I am running the latest ubuntu. Sometimes it randomly stops accepting ssh connections, afp/smb connections, and even stops responding to pinging. It is connected via WIFI.

I go over to the desktop and use the browser, and the internet still works fine. Then after a while, it starts accepting incoming traffic again.

View 3 Replies View Related

Networking :: Block All Incoming Mail Traffic Except Certain Addresses?

Jan 12, 2009

assist me in using the iptables firewall to block all incoming mail traffic (SMTP port 25) except that of a certain IP(s)? the situation is that we have a server that we only want to receive mail from a particular sender.

View 1 Replies View Related

General :: Redirect Incoming Traffic To An Other Port (ubuntu Openvpn Server)?

Dec 5, 2010

I have set up an openvpn server on ubuntu via port tcp 443. The server use a public network and almost every ports are blocked (not 443) So when a client connect to the server, if it send traffic needing a blocked port, the connection cannot been etablished of course. So i d like to know if it is possible to redirect all incoming traffic on the server to an other unblocked port (like 443) to bypass firewall.

I dont think openvpn offer this possibility but maybe with linux it is possible..

View 3 Replies View Related

Networking :: Routing All Traffic To Internet Through A Box?

Oct 6, 2010

I am sharing my DSL internet connection using a modem+wireless router (single device) to 5 systems. I want all my internet traffic to go through one of the linux boxes in my network.

The problem here is that wireless devices connect directly to the modem+wireless router.

Is such routing of traffic possible??

PS: I am not sure if i could convey my situation clearly...

View 2 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Networking :: Bridging Firewall - How To Block Incoming Traffic

May 2, 2010

I have a ubuntu computer set up as bridge between gateway and lan, with the lan connected to eth0 and gateway on eth1.

I'm trying to get it to basically block everything incoming except for the ports i specify, but also allow outgoing traffic. I've found, tried, modified som examples i found on the web, but still it wont block incoming traffic (ie, im still able to reach my webserver)

These are the rules, and i can't figure out why it wont block:

Code:
#!/bin/bash
iptables -F
iptables -X
iptables -I INPUT -i eth1 -j DROP

[Code].....

View 1 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Networking :: Iptables: Block Incoming And Allow Outgoing Traffic

Jan 6, 2011

I need to configure iptables to block incoming traffic (except specific ports), but allows all outgoing traffic.

I am able to block incoming traffic, but doing so also prevents outgoing traffic (tested by telnet [URL] 80)

The following was used:

iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport ssh -j ACCEPT
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
iptables -I INPUT 1 -i lo -j ACCEPT
iptables -A INPUT -j DROP

Also, even allowing NOT SYN requests still prevents outgoing traffic.

iptables -I INPUT 1 -p tcp ! --syn -j ACCEPT

Another point:

# modinfo ipt_state
modinfo: could not open /lib/modules/2.6.18-028stab070.14/modules.dep

How to install ipt_state module on ubuntu?

View 2 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Networking :: Routing - Forward All Traffic To An Ip To Another Ip

Jul 25, 2010

I need to be able to do the following: Physical Router located at 192.168.40.1

On Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid machine:
eth0 with static ip 192.168.40.2
eth1 with static ip 192.168.40.3
eth2 with static ip 192.168.40.4

Associate a virtual address to eth1 with an entirely different network address such as 192.168.50.1 Do the same (virtual address) for eth2 -- e.g. 192.168.60.1 In the application:

register phone number A at 192.168.40.1 (The application will automatically use eth0 for this)
register phone number B at 192.168.50.1
register phone number C at 192.168.60.1

Somehow forward all traffic (including the register request) sent to 192.168.50.1 to 192.168.40.1 as if the register had been made directly to 192.168.40.1. In other words, the app "sends" registration and traffic to 192.168.50.1 but then Ubuntu forwards it to 192.168.40.1 (but the app does not know that). Similarly, forward all traffic sent to 192.168.60.1 to the router at 192.168.40.1.

Do the same for the reverse, forward all traffic that the router sends back to 192.168.40.3 (eth1) to 192.168.50.1 (within the Ubuntu machine) so that the app knows it is for phone B. Similarly forward all traffic that the router sends back to 192.168.40.4 (eth2) to 192.168.60.1 so that the app knows it is for phone C. Thus, the application believes that it is registering at 3 completely separate routers on 3 completely separate networks via 3 separate network interfaces but in fact is really registering all three to the same router (but does not know that). Similarly, the router believes that it is receiving 3 separate registrations because it receives each registration request and traffic from 3 separate interfaces and thus 3 separate mac addresses (i.e., of eth0, eth1, and eth2). Traffic sent to and from the router for each of the 3 phone numbers (via eth0, eth1, and eth2) are not mixed because the translation happens in both directions.

View 9 Replies View Related

Networking :: Trace Incoming And Outgoing Network Traffic For A Give User?

Mar 14, 2010

OS : CentOS 5.3 64bit How to trace incoming and outgoing network traffic for a give user? User 'A' logs in to the system and does various network connectivity As root user need to find what are the outgoing and incoming connection that are related with user 'A'. basically need to check the connection flow. netstat will show ESTABLISHED, LISTEN etc.. need something like tcpdump

Eg:- --user option for tcpdump tcpdump -vv -nn -i eth0 host 10.200.2.1 and tcp dst port 8080 --user A Can someone tell me any tool which can do such thing? Even if it can show the process ID of the client application which is trying to establish network connectivity will do.

View 1 Replies View Related

Fedora Networking :: Advance Routing And Traffic Control

Feb 23, 2010

I'm currently reading through the Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control HOWTO from lartc.org, and I'm wondering whether anyone knows of a file where I could keep qos rules persistent across a reboot, similar to /etc/sysconfig/iptables for netfilter. Should I just write my own script, or does something already exist?
By the way, iproute-2.6.29-4.fc12.i686.

View 2 Replies View Related

Networking :: IPTables And Routing On Untangle Box - Traffic Not Returned

Aug 20, 2010

I have an Untangle Box - which for those that don't know is a modified Debian Lenny used as a router, proxy, filter and much more - It has three physical interfaces on it eht0 (incoming traffic), eth1 (Outgoing to LAN after traffic filtered), and eth2 (Called a DMZ NIC, as Untangle can be used as a router). There is also a tun0 interface setup by Untangle for VPN (Not using the Openvpn in Untangle because I need bridged a bridged VPN and this is not an option in Untangles offering), a br0.eth setup by untangle to bridge eth0 and eth1 for traffic flow through as it is inline from router to switch and not acting as the router itself, and a br0 interface that I have setup by bridge script bridging eth2 and tap0 to run OpenVPN as a bridged VPN.

The routes on the machine are as follow:
Code:
untangle:~# route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.100.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 br.eth0
192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 br0
192.0.2.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 dummy0
192.0.2.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 utun
untangle:~#

I don't see a default route listed here, however, I do have Internet connectivity on the Untangle box itself. I also know that by script to bridge the tap0 and eth2 interfaces adds a default route through the gateway on the network that eth2 is connected to. So the lack of a default route is somewhat puzzling to me, I do have the gateway set through the web based admin interface Untangle offers.

The iptables rules are as follow:
Code:
untangle:~# iptables --list-rules
-P INPUT ACCEPT
-P FORWARD ACCEPT
-P OUTPUT ACCEPT
-N alpaca-firewall .....

There was an addition output rule in the alpaca-nat-firewall rule that said DROP outgoing interface eth2, I removed that rule with no change. I can ping out from the Untangle server to the eth2 LAN, I can access resources in the eth2 subnet. But I cannot get any reply from the server from anything either in that subnet or not. If I run iftop I can see the incoming traffic form my ping but the Server sends out no reply. I think this is a firewall issue. I can access the server by connecting to the IP assigned to the eth0/br0.eth interface which is in my main LAN. I am also attaching a crude diagram of the previous setup and the new setup (Previous setup used a different server for my bridged VPN).

Is there a rule I can add to ensure that traffic coming in on an interface goes out the same interface? Do I have a rule blocking incoming traffic to eth2/br0? Do I have one blocking sending out on eth2/br0? Do I have a default rule that is killing the traffic on eth2/br0 and I need to add an accept rule for traffic coming in on eth2/br0? I tried adding an accept rule for traffic coming in on br0, but it didn't work. I tried an output rule, but that didn't work, but I may have been bungling these rules as I do not fully understand the syntax and function and body of an iptables rule. The exact original iptables information before I modified anything can be viewed at [URL].

View 4 Replies View Related

Networking :: Port Based Routing For Local Traffic?

May 24, 2009

I have problem with port based routing for local traffic. I can't use trick with iptables -t mangle, ip route table 1, ip rule fwmark table 1 because it works only with forwarded packets. I can't even use patch-o-matic because it's obsolete. And xtables-addons doesn't contain support for "-j ROUTE" yet.

View 2 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Networking :: Vpnc Traffic Routing - IPSec Target Network?

Nov 16, 2010

I just got vpnc setup to work with my VPN at work and now I am trying to figure out how to limit the traffic that is routed through the VPN while I'm connected to it. I only want traffic going to the local domain to be routed through the VPN.This is what my vpnc config file looks like:

Code:
IPSec gateway publicdomain.example.com
IPSec ID XXXX

[code]....

View 2 Replies View Related

Networking :: Server To Block All Traffic But US Only Traffic?

Mar 15, 2011

I wanted to tell my server to block all traffic but US only traffic. So i followed this guide:[URL].. Now I know, it's the best way to help prevent hackers/crackers (doesn't matter to me what they are called. I just have to stop them). My server only deals with US clients anyways so might as well just start right there for my server's security before getting into the brute force and injection preventions. So I got it all done compiled everything moved to the proper directory. I then started to setup my iptables. Like so

Code: iptables -F INPUT
iptables -F OUTPUT
iptables -I INPUT 1 -s *.*.*.* -p tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT
iptables -I INPUT 2 -s *.*.*.* -p tcp -j ACCEPT

[Code]...

After seeing that i went digging in the code and figured it was something todo with memory allocation.

View 1 Replies View Related

Debian Configuration :: IPTABLES Protocol To Reject All Incoming Ssh Traffic

Apr 4, 2010

a good IPTABLES protocol to reject all incoming ssh trafiic except for a single IP or IP range?

View 4 Replies View Related

Server :: PPTP Traffic - Gre Traffic Is Being Generated During The Browsing / Reduce Traffic

Sep 27, 2009

Recently I notice that when I'm connected to an vpn server (pptpd) and I'm using it as a default gateway my download and upload speed decreases almost to the half of the usual speed. I made a test using iptables in order to count how much GRE packets are generated (except the real traffic itself) in that way:

Code:
iptables -I INPUT -p gre -j ACCEPT
iptables -I OUTPUT -p gre -j ACCEPT

iptables -I FORWARD -s 172.16.10.101 -j ACCEPT
iptables -I FORWARD -d 172.16.10.101 -j ACCEPT
The first 2 rules match all GRE packets between the pptpd server and client, and the next rules - the traffic between the server and the client.

When I turn the counters to zero and begin to generate traffic (to browse, to download etc.) I see that the GRE packets are even more than these in the FORWARD chain.

So, my question is first of all is my test correct and is it true that so much gre traffic is being generated during the browsing (it becames clear that the traffic is double than if the pptpd wasn't used as a gateway) and if yes - can that traffic be reduced?

View 3 Replies View Related

Debian Configuration :: Routing - Forward All Traffic To An Ip To Another Ip?

Jul 25, 2010

I need to be able to do the following: Physical Router located at 192.168.40.1 On Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid machine:

eth0 with static ip 192.168.40.2
eth1 with static ip 192.168.40.3
eth2 with static ip 192.168.40.4

Associate a virtual address to eth1 with an entirely different network address such as 192.168.50.1 Do the same (virtual address) for eth2 -- e.g. 192.168.60.1 In the application:

register phone number A at 192.168.40.1 (The application will automatically use eth0 for this)
register phone number B at 192.168.50.1
register phone number C at 192.168.60.1

Somehow forward all traffic (including the register request) sent to 192.168.50.1 to 192.168.40.1 as if the register had been made directly to 192.168.40.1. In other words, the app "sends" registration and traffic to 192.168.50.1 but then Ubuntu forwards it to 192.168.40.1 (but the app does not know that). Similarly, forward all traffic sent to 192.168.60.1 to the router at 192.168.40.1.

Do the same for the reverse, forward all traffic that the router sends back to 192.168.40.3 (eth1) to 192.168.50.1 (within the Ubuntu machine) so that the app knows it is for phone B. Similarly forward all traffic that the router sends back to 192.168.40.4 (eth2) to 192.168.60.1 so that the app knows it is for phone C. Thus, the application believes that it is registering at 3 completely separate routers on 3 completely separate networks via 3 separate network interfaces but in fact is really registering all three to the same router (but does not know that). Similarly, the router believes that it is receiving 3 separate registrations because it receives each registration request and traffic from 3 separate interfaces and thus 3 separate mac addresses (i.e., of eth0, eth1, and eth2). Traffic sent to and from the router for each of the 3 phone numbers (via eth0, eth1, and eth2) are not mixed because the translation happens in both directions.

View 10 Replies View Related

Networking :: Run Windows Server 2003 With KVM On Slackware 13.1, Two Dedicated IP

Feb 4, 2011

I have a server running slackware 13.1, and it is running windows server 2003 with QEMU-KVM. I followed [URL , now two system can connect each other.

The problem is: I bought two dedicated IPs, and I wanna know how to setup these two system to be Internet Servers.(Nginx in slackware, IIS in 2003) I found some subjects but I can't find what I want.

View 2 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Networking :: Set Up Dedicated Server For Source Games - Port Closed?

Jun 23, 2011

I am currently having an issue attempting to set up a dedicated server for source games (TF2, CS:S, L4D2). The required port (27015), along with most others, appears closed to the rest of the world and upon a port scan with DMZ hosting on (therefore no router interference between the internet and my computer) only a few ports are open (80, 139, 443, 445). My ISP does not block ports so therefore the only issue I can find is with my computer running Ubuntu 11.04. I have ensured that all traffic is allowed via iptables and I can't think of anything else that would have ports closed.

View 9 Replies View Related

Networking :: Insert Routing Data Into The Routing Table Doesn't Work?

Apr 6, 2010

I have a firewall, this consists of three NIC's:

Code: eth0[192.168.0.2] eth1[192.168.1.2] and eth2[10.10.165.2]

I am trying to ping eth0 from eth2, but I am not able to succesfully get a response from pinging the device, I am using:

Code: ping 192.168.0.2 -I eth2

I have tried to insert routing data into the routing table, but it still doesn't work

View 2 Replies View Related

Networking :: Re-route Https To Incoming Server?

Dec 26, 2010

i'm attemping to re-route incoming traffic of https to one of my servers. (a windows xp with subversion on it)

problem is if i do that ALL https traffic from other pc's is stopped. meaning i can't get any reply from any url with https;

View 6 Replies View Related

Networking :: Networking Routing \ Use The Terminal To Assign Server Eth0 A Proper IP Address?

Jun 8, 2010

i know exactly what i need to do, im just not familiar enough with command line to do it properly.i have 7 computers.the first 4 are connected to a router via wireless at one end of the house. of the last 3 only 1 will be able to access the router via wireless, so it needs to share it's one wireless connection via ethernet. this computer i'm going to call 'server'server will have two IP'swlan0 192.168.1.6 this connects to the router that has internet access.eth0 i intend to have the following settingsip:192.168.0.1sub: 255.255.0eth0 will connect to a second router, where the cat5 cable goes from the server, into the internet port of the router where i will define the router's static IP:IP: 192.168.0.100sub: 255.255.255.0gateway 192.168.0.1i have then set the router IP for LAN handling as 192.168.27.1 and all ethernet connections will have a 192.168.27.x IP.

so i need to know how to, without a gui application, use the terminal to assign server eth0 a proper IP address, and tell the server to take the connection it has and share it through eth0 to supply internet for the last 2 computers via ethernet.i had it set up in this way with a windows machine being the one that had the wifi access, but i'd rather have it setup for the ubuntu server to do this task. security is imperative for these 3 remaining machines, so just getting 2 more wifi adapters for a connection to the initial router isn't an option.the 2 that connect to server do so through SSH and though server IS connected via wireless it only makes outward connections through

View 1 Replies View Related

Networking :: Ubuntu Server Does Not Accept Incoming Network Connections Like SSH?

Feb 25, 2011

I have a bunch of Ubuntu boxes on one subnet, 192.168.1.0. I have a Windows 7 box on another subnet, 192.168.2.0. I am able to ping and SSH to all servers on the .1 subnet except for one server, which I will call PITA. I will attempt to SSH to PITA, and it won't respond, nor does it respond to pings. I will the SSH to PITA from another of the test servers, successfully connect, and then when I SSH from my Windows 7 machine I can connect successfully. If I first connect via console to PITA and send some pings out (to anywhere, like 4.2.2.2), I can also connect from my Windows 7 machine. I've never seen anything like this.

One of the weird things is that I used PITA to create an image that I then used to create many of the other test servers, and they work fine, so I'm not sure what the problem is. I've checked /var/log/messages and syslog and there's nothing in them that indicates a problem. I've rebooted this server, restarted SSH, changed the IP in case it was conflicting with something else, forced an ARP update in case it was cached (since I had bonded the interfaces), cleared the ARP cache on my own machine, verified Network Manager is not installed...and I still have this issue.

Here are some network-related config:

/etc/network/interfaces

Quote:

# This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
# and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5).
# The loopback network interface

[code]....

View 3 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Networking :: Two NIC Routing From Laptop To Server?

Feb 27, 2011

I have a server that has two NIC cards installed eth0 and eth1 we use a linksys router (192.168.2.1) which runs DNS for our LAN. I have installed Squid on the server which runs Ubuntu server (8.04 Hardy) w/ GUI. I can surf the net on the server with google chrome configured to use proxy server localhost:3128...works good. The router is wire directly to eth0. I have my laptop (running Ubuntu Hardy) wired to eth1 and I want to be able to surf the Internet through my server. From my laptop, I can ping 192.168.2.100 which is the IP address assigned to eth1[?] by my router. I assume I need to establish a route from my laptop to my server. I would like to archive this via the CLI and I am not having any luck thus far. If I add static IP addresses to eth1on the server and eth0 on my laptop will this simplify the process? How can I add a route which will allow me access to the Internet via my laptop?

Server:
Code:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1000 0 0 eth1
0.0.0.0 192.168.2.1 0.0.0.0 UG 100 0 0 eth1
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 U 1000 0 0 eth0

ifconfig eth1 on the server:
Code:
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:30:48:85:cc:1b
inet addr:192.168.2.100 Bcast:192.168.2.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::230:48ff:fe85:cc1b/64 Scope:Link
Up Broadcast running Multicast MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:7701 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:7898 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:5572718 (5.3 MB) TX bytes:1506869 (1.4 MB)
Base address:0x9000 Memory:ef400000-ef420000

View 7 Replies View Related

Networking :: NFS Server Serving 3 Subnets And Routing ?

Apr 23, 2010

I have one main subnet 192.168.50.0/24 with a defaultrouter 192.168.50.1 connected to the internet. I have an NFS server on that network. Everything is working as desired and machines are able to see each other and access the internet.

Now, I would like to add two more interfaces to the NFS server (running Slackware Linux), each on its own different subnet, say 192.168.51.0/24 and 192.168.52.0/24. The clients on those new subnets should also be able to access the internet (through the router 192.168.50.1). how to setup routing? Do I need any additional hardware router in between, or just a software configuration on the NFS server?

On a side note I have VLAN capable switches (couple of ProCurve 1800-24G) and would like to separate the three subnets using VLANs instead of using three separate switches.

View 1 Replies View Related

Networking :: Re Routing IP Address - Without Having To Make Changes On The DNS Server

Feb 9, 2010

I have the following setup:

Location A:
Internet -> ISP 1 -> Firewall 1 (external IP address) -> Web Server 1 (internal IP address)
Location B:
Internet -> ISP 1 -> ISP 2 -> Firewall 2 (external IP address) -> Web Server 2 (internal IP address)

I want to find out if I can failover to another location without having to make changes on the DNS server. Just by redirecting traffic from ISP 1 router to ISP 2 router.

View 1 Replies View Related

Networking :: Iptables - Allow Http And Https Together With Mail Server (incoming And Outgoing) And Ftp - Ftps And Ssh

Apr 28, 2010

i need is to have http and https allowed, together with mail server (incoming and outgoing) and ftp, ftps and ssh. all other ports have to be closed.

View 3 Replies View Related

Fedora Networking :: Routing: 2 HW-Routers, 2 Nics On 1 Server?

Mar 19, 2011

i have a Server, which has 2 nics installed. Each of those is connected to a router, which is connected to internet. On the server, i have apache, maillserver and im-server running. On the other hand, also squid, dansguardian and clam are running. so now: via eth0 i would like to have just the traffic, which is requested from outside (the big bad internet..) to my server (apache, mail, etc). via eth1 i would like to have all OUTGOING (also to the big bad internet) from the server, which is requested by a internal client. And of course all requests to my own server

both nics shall route their traffic to their own router. For better comprehension please consult the enclosed graph. Until now, i did not find a good solution, the default route is set to the traffic from eth0, if not, no external request will find back to a client do you have a idea how to handle this the easiest way?

View 4 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved