I am trying to set my gigabit NIC to 1000 MB setting using ethtool. The only way I can get it to register that way is to turn off auto negotiation and that just kills my signal. Below is the output of the current settings and the commands I have attempted with zero success.
[Code]....
I have two onboard gigabit connections and a PCI-E gigabit card, none of which seem to want to run beyond 100M. Everytime I issue the command to change speed to 1000M, it does nothing. I have tried modifying the interfaces file to make sure the command line for ethtool gets done automatically, but still no luck.
Below is the output from the use of ethtool to change speed. Since I am having performance issues with my local area networking (e.g. Samba transferring slower than the internet), I have been trying to figure out how to debug my network performance, and this was an obvious thing that stood out. The router and card are gigabit, yet don't use their full transfer rates.
[Code]...
I have fedora 12 installed in VMWare ESX on a Dell Optiplex machine with a Intel GBit lan.While transfering from fedora's vsftpd to my workstation trough a sitecom gbit switch i get a real bad performance, mostly not higher then 8mb/s. (btw on the same ESX i have Windows 2008 from which i get around 60mb/s)I have tried to set the eth0 to 1000Mb/s full duplex using ethtools but this fails (ethtool -s eth0 speed 1000 duplex full autoneg off). I keep recieving the following error:
Code:
Cannot get current device settings: Operation not supported
not setting speed
[code]....
have a " Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev 06)" NIC.I was unable to set it 1000bit and full duplexThe output lspci -v as below.Quote:
03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev 06)
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device 8432
[code]...
So I have tried looking on the web for a solution to this, but I can't find anything. I have only found 2 posts with the same problem and both went unanswered. So I want to set my ubuntu machine to WOL with both Magic Packet and Unicast (the g and u functions in ethtool wol) wol supported: pumbg (thus g and u are both supported) I use "sudo ethtool -s eth0 wol ug" and check to see if it changed, and it does
sudo ethtool eth0
"wol: ug"
After I suspend though, only magic packet will wake it up! I go back in and check with "sudo ethtool eth0" and low and behold, it is back to only being "wol g", which is the default. For some reason it must bump back to default before going into suspend. NOTE, this is with suspend, not even a reboot or a shutdown! Even suspend will reset it to default. I have worked on adding a script to /etc/init.d, adding lines to /etc/rc.local, and adding lines to /etc/networking/interfaces, all with no change.
Any idea what is going on and why it is resetting wol back to default?? I know I should be happy at LEAST it does magic packet, but I want to know why it wont change.
I have a router that is 1000 Base T and two computers each with ethernet cards that support 1000 Base T. All are equipped with Cat 5e cable. Before I had a router that only went up to 100 Base T and I would setup one box with linux running proftpd. On the other box,I would use win xp pro and use firefox to ftp into the other box and download a file. Download speeds went up to 11.2 MB/sec. Now when I switched routers, I expected something like 120 MB/sec but I'm only getting 5.3 MB/sec. What do I need to change?
View 12 Replies View RelatedI'm having problems enabling Wake-on-LAN using ethtool.I'm using ethtool 5.1 on Fedora 8. Ethtool reports that the card supports u,m,b,g for WOL modes. I can run "ethtool -s eth0 wol g", which completes without errors.If I run ethtool again, the Wake-on setting is changed to whatever I just set it to. However, when I actually shutdown the machine, the lights on the NIC don't stay on as they normally should, and any attempts to wake the machine have no effect. The machine dual-boot Windows XP, and I have enabled WOL in the driver there. When I shutdown the machine from XP, everything works just fine. The NIC lights remain on and the machine wakes up properly. So...I think I have my BIOS configured properly, and my WOL utility is working properly.
Hardware Info:
------------------------------------------------------------
Adapter: Intel Pro/1000 GT PCI (Vendor ID: 8086, Device ID: 107C
Motherboard: Asus P5Q Pro
lspci Output:
------------------------------------------------------------
Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82541PI Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 05)
ethtool Output:
------------------------------------------------------------
Settings for eth0:
Supported ports: [ TP ]
Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
[code]....
dmesg Output:
------------------------------------------------------------
e1000: eth0: e1000_probe: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
e1000: eth0: e1000_watchdog: NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
[code]....
Im trying to remote power on my debian machine with gnome with the wake on lan function. I enabled it on my mainboard and was configuring my ethtool. There i see:
root@lappy:~# ethtool eth0
Settings for eth0:
Supports Wake-on: g
Wake-on: d
Link detected: yes
and after this command ethtool -s eth0 wol g i get this:
root@lappy:~# ethtool eth0
Settings for eth0:
Supports Wake-on: g
Wake-on: g
Link detected: yes
So i enabled it on software and hardware. Now im trying to sent the magic packets with a windows tool "wake on lan" I see that the package has been sent but the pc wont turn on. So when i check the ethtool settings again i see that it turned to:
Wake-on: d
I just started learning network on linux platform. Today I came across two commands ethtool and miitool. Both of them seems to do similar kind of jobs. Now I am confused what is the difference between them.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have upgraded to 10.04 from 9.10 after that, i get this strange issue.I have acutally asingned static address in the network manager applet.
Code:
mahiti@mahiti-admin:~$ sudo mii-tool -vv eth4
Using SIOCGMIIPHY=0x8947
[code]....
I am running a test to determine when packet drops occur. I'm using a Spirent TestCenter through a switch (necessary to aggregate Ethernet traffic from 5 ports to one optical link) to a server using a Myricom card.While running my test, if the input rate is below a certain value, ethtool does not report any drop (except dropped_multicast_filtered which is incrementing at a very slow rate). However, tcpdump reports X number of packets "dropped by kernel". Then if I increase the input rate, ethtool reports drops but "ifconfig eth2" does not. In fact, ifconfig doesn't seem to report any packet drops at all. Do they all measure packet drops at different "levels", i.e. ethtool at the NIC level, tcpdump at the kernel level etc?nd am I right to say that in the journey of an incoming packet, the NIC level is the "so-called" first level, then the kernel, then the user application? So any packet drop is likely to happen first at the NIC, then the kernel, then the user application? So if there is no packet drop at the NIC, but packet drop at the kernel, then the bottleneck is not at the NIC?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a CentOS 5.5 machine (hosted at a remote hosting company) where "ethtool" reports that the eth0 device is currently in 10 Mbps mode, but the output indicates that it supports 100 Mbps. But if I try using ethtool to switch the device into 100 Mbps mode, it doesn't work; after running the command to switch it to 100 Mbps, ethtool reports the speed is still 10 Mbps:
[root@sls-eb5p17 network-scripts]# ethtool eth0
Settings for eth0:
Supported ports: [ TP MII ]
Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
[Code]...
The man page at [URL]..ethtool seems to suggest that this should have worked. Any reason why the reported speed of the device didn't change? Changing other settings doesn't appear to work either, e.g. if I specify "duplex half" instead of "speed 100", eth0 still reports "Duplex: Full".
I have a question regarding packet drops. I am running a test to determine when packet drops occur. I'm using a Spirent TestCenter through a switch (necessary to aggregate Ethernet traffic from 5 ports to one optical link) to a server using a Myricom card. While running my test, if the input rate is below a certain value, ethtool does not report any drop (except dropped_multicast_filtered which is incrementing at a very slow rate). However, tcpdump reports X number of packets "dropped by kernel". Then if I increase the input rate, ethtool reports drops but "ifconfig eth2" does not.
In fact, ifconfig doesn't seem to report any packet drops at all. Do they all measure packet drops at different "levels", i.e. ethtool at the NIC level, tcpdump at the kernel level etc? And am I right to say that in the journey of an incoming packet, the NIC level is the "so-called" first level, then the kernel, then the user application? So any packet drop is likely to happen first at the NIC, then the kernel, then the user application? So if there is no packet drop at the NIC, but packet drop at the kernel, then the bottleneck is not at the NIC?
I am fighting with the WOL settings of my Ubuntu box at the moment. The idea is to have an HTTP/SVN server to sleep while it's unused and wake up when it's accessed. So far, wake-on-LAN works and is activated on startup:
[Code]....
As you can see, I also set the wol p flag ('wake on physical activity'). My assumption was that I could convince the device to wake up not only on magic packets, but on any network access. This, however, seems to be wrong.
With the official release of Fedora 11, I decided to make an updated tutorial on how to install it and configure it on the Eee PC 901/1000. You can find the tutorial and packages on the fedora-eee website. I just started this thread for Eee PC-specific F11 troubleshooting and any questions or remarks regarding the procedure or packages.
View 14 Replies View RelatedI'm operating a server running Slackware 12.1 and I need to install a PCI-E 10/100/1000 NIC, im just wondering if anyone has any recommendations for a card that has solid support under linux or is otherwise known working.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm running a wired gigabit card using the atl1c driver. It works fine, but I don't get gigabit, only 100 Mbps. I have a gigabit switch and other Ubuntu machines on my network are gigabit. Is there any way this could be a software/configuration issue, or is the only likely explanation that my wires are of sub-par quality somewhere?
View 1 Replies View RelatedUsing the onboard gigabit ethernet interface on an Asus M2N-CM DVI motherboard (nVidia chipset) with CentOS 5.2 the ethtool utility recognises that the NIC is capable of gigabit:
# ethtool eth0
Settings for eth0:
Supported ports: [ MII ]
Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
[code]....
I am running CentOS 5.3.The NIC on my motherboard does not support gigabit, so I bought a gigabit network card. I installed the network card and configured it via system-config-network. Everything seems to work fine as long as I keep a cable plugged into the original NIC. The original NIC works just fine if it is the only one with a network connection, but as soon as I uplug the original NIC I can no longer ping nor connect to the server via the gigabit NIC.
The original NIC is eth0, the new NIC is eth1. Is there something I need to do to tell the system that eth0 is not required or something? I've never encountered an issue like this before...
Fedora 12 is nearly turnkey on my Asus EEE 1000 SSD netbook. I just needed a few tweaks to get the wireless and touchpad seutp. All of this info is scattered in various places including right here on the FedoraForum, but I thought if it would help just one more person to have it all in one place, then so be it.
1) I used the Fedora 12 i686 Live iso.
2) I installed it on a 1GB thumbdrive using my desktop Fedora 11 system:
sudo livecd-iso-to-disk Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso /dev/sdg1
3) While booting the EEE, hit the Esc key and select the USB device of the thumbdrive. Make sure a wired ethernet is plugged in. We will restore the wireless later.
4) Pick the defaults, except when it comes to the disk partitioning. I have the pair of SSD drives, one 8GB and the other 32GB. I reduced the swap volume size to 2GB to match the memory in the device rather than using the 4GB default (2x memory) and increased the / volume size to the max. I planned on turning off swapping and only intended to use the swap space for the sleep/hibernate functionality. Otherwise, I let the installation setup the layout. a /boot with 200MB of space, 2gb swap volume, and the rest under LVM covering both SSDs.
5) Finish the installation. Reboot and create your user.
6) Apply any patches that are available using SoftwareUpdate. Reboot if necessary.
7) Now time for setting up the wireless. We need the rt2860 driver. This is available in the rpmfusion.org repro. First we need to set it up. Bring up FF and use this url:
[Code]...
I am having trouble establishing a connection with my WPA wireless network at home. Other laptops at home can connect to this network and even the Eee PC can join free wifi networks. The problem seems to be only with WPA networks. When I enter the password for the WPA network, it tries to connect for a while and then shows me the password dialog box again. I don't get any IP during this time, its always 0.0.0.0 I reinstalled my Ubuntu netbook remix but that didn't help. This problem was occurring in the standard Ubuntu 10.04 too.
View 2 Replies View Relatedenv: debian kernel 2.6.31/ gcc 4.x/ hp6910p I encounter a problem whilst trying to connect online using Intel PRO/1000 nic, but fail. It seems the problem of nic (Intel PRO/1000 'e1000e').
dmesg | grep e10001 shows
Code:
Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - 1.0.2-k2
PCI INT A -> GSI 22 (level, low) -> IRQ 22
pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting failed 0xfffffffb
irq 29 for MSI/MSI-X
dmesg | grep eth0 shows
[Code]...
What should I do so that I am able to solve this issue or does any resource/ doc tell how to configure e1000e to enable Intel PRO/1000 nic?
I have a temlnet problem -telnet 192.168.0.4 1004 failed.
At 192.168.0.2, "telnet 192.168.0.4" make connection successfully at port 23, however "telnet 192.168.0.4 1000" does not make connection at port 1000.
I recently did a clean install of Ubuntu 10.04 on my machine. It previously had windows 7 on it and everything worked flawlessly. Now the gigabit LAN connection only connects at 10Mb/s under Ubuntu. I installed a virtual machine with windows 7 and there it connects at 1Gb/s.
[Code]...
I have a machine with an MSI motherboard and gigabit ethernet. However, it only reports being connected at 100Mb/s. I have tried using ethtool to force the speed to gigabit but it doesn't seem to have any effect. I'm using Ubuntu 11.04. Does anyone know a way other than ethtool to set the network speed?
View 9 Replies View RelatedFrom what I can see in mii-tool I should be getting 1000Mbit link but when I transfer files I only get 100mpbs?
Code:
morrow:~# mii-tool
eth0: no link
eth1: no link
eth2: negotiated 1000baseT-HD flow-control, link ok
eth3: negotiated 1000baseT-HD flow-control, link ok
morrow:~# lshw -C Network
*-network:0 .....
My kernal version is 2.6.32.10-90.fc12.i686.PAE
I'm running Fedora 12.
It auto-detected the card, but it's only operating at 100mb/s. It's connected to a gigabit switch. The driver auto-installed for the card is r8169. How do i get it up to the speed is should be at? Its kinda why i bought it...
We have a Linux box which acts a a file server. Currently, files and directories are exported using NFS.At the moment, we are a bit concern on its data transfer performance. FYI, we are using a embedded Gigabit Ethernet port on the file server. We ran a few simple write tests between NFS client (also utilizes GigE port) and the NFS server. In these tests, both NFS server and client are both connected directly to each other with a Cat5E cable. Unfortunately, the write/transfer speed results are not as per our expectation. It scores roughly about 11-12MByte/s, where as theoretically Gigabit Ethernet transfer rate is able to reach up to approximately 120MByte/s.I wouldn't expect to reach the theoretical max transfer rate (it would be great if we can , but I would appreciate if you guys can share with us in terms of the following :
1) What's the practical max data transfer rate which you guys managed to observe in a normal Gigabit based connection? What about jumbo frames configuration?
2) Is there any additional tuning/configuration we need to do within the OS to reach those practical max data transfer rate figure?
3) Does PCI-e / system bus plays a role in achieving this speed? For example, we are using the embedded GigE port and we heard some people says embedded ports are actually sharing the system bus and resources with other devices, which might adds into performance issue. Correct me if I'm wrong.
4) Does converting to Cat6 cabling will guarantee an increase in the data transfer performance?
5) In the future (once we are clear on how much single GigE transfer rate we can go) , we are looking into doing bonding since that the NFS server's shared directory/volume read-write speed is way much higher (i.e 400-600MByte/s). Will bonding allow us to achieve higher NFS read/write speed? What are the bonding modes best used for this purposes? Appreciate if anybody who has experience in doing bonding for NFS can share their experience.
I recently bought an HP mini 1030NR and wanted to get fedora on it. I found this and it pretty much guided me right through the process. I thought it might be helpful for others.[URL]..
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5754 NIC and I cannot seem to get the NIC to auto link at Gig speeds. It will only link @ 100/full.
View 1 Replies View Related