I wonder if SELinux really are necessary for a home desktop ?
It only makes my computer use more problematic than it already is.
What can happend if I uninstall it on my Fedora 13 dist ?
Is the hole Internet going to come in to my computer and destroy it ?
If I uninstall SELinux, is the firewall uninstalled also ?
I get spammed with this message by the troubleshooter, is the audit-libs package related to this ? there was an update today.
View 2 Replies View Relatedthis is the allert i got:Code:Summary:Your system may be seriously compromised! /usr/sbin/NetworkManager tried to loada kernel module.Detailed Description:SELinux has prevented NetworkManager from loading a kernel module. All confinedprograms that need to load kernel modules should have already had policy writtenfor them. If a compromised application tries to modify the kernel this AVC willbe generated. This is a serious issue.Your system may very well be compromised.Allowing Access:Contact your security administrator and report this issue.Additional Information:
Source Context system_u:system_r:NetworkManager_t:s0
Target Context system_u:system_r:NetworkManager_t:s0
Target Objects None [ capability ]
[code]....
I was setting up a Samba server and I ran into some problems with SELinux related to the context of the home directories. I made a user account, say "UserAccount", with a default home directory "home/UserAccount". Afterwards I realized that I needed to move the home directory of this particular user to another location, say "/home2/UserAccount". So I created the new directory, changed the permissions, and used Gnome's system-config-user to change the user's home directory.
I then set-up the Samba server, activated samba_run_unconfined and samba_enable_home_dirs in SELinux, and made an account for UserAccount. When testing the Samba account for UserAccount SELinux denied read access. I checked the context and the new home directory did not appeared to have been updated. I had to manually run:
restorecon -R -v /home2/UserAccount
to set the context on the new home directory. I'm not very familiar with SELinux, so my question is this: is this normal security policy or is a bug in the system-config-user tool? If it's normal policy can someone explain why? I'm always ready to learn Distro: Fedora 12 (kernel: 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686) System: Dual Intel Xeon @ 3.2 GHz, 1 GB RAM
I'm attempting to get MapServer running on my Fedora 13 computer. I was able to install with the package manager, and the executable (mapserv) was originally placed in /usr/sbin. But I need it in /var/www/cgi-bin to work on the webserver. So I copied the file to the right location. Unfortunately, it doesn't have the correct SELinux context. Here's the message from the troubleshooter:
SELinux denied access requested by /var/www/cgi-bin/mapserv. /var/www/cgi-bin/mapserv is mislabeled. /var/www/cgi-bin/mapserv default type is httpd_sys_script_exec_t, but its current type is httpd_sys_script_exec_t. Changing this file back to the default type, may fix your problem.
How's that for circular logic? Does anyone have an idea what the correct SELinux context for a cgi-bin executable might be?
Trying to keep selinux enabled. When I start SeLinux Troubleshooter from the menu, which is inautostart as well, It tells me SELinux not enabled, sealert will not run on nonSELinus systems".How do I get SELinux permanently started then
View 10 Replies View RelatedMy newly installed Fedora-14 (64-bit) has SELinux disabled. I can't find any way to enable it. I tried to set it manually in /etc/selinux/config to enforcing or permissive but nothing happens after reboot. In GUI configuration tool it is set to disabled and grayed out so that there is no way to enable it there. Is there another way to enable SELinux?
View 11 Replies View RelatedI tried to log in to my xguest account and it asked for a password, which it shouldn't, so there's a problem with SELinux.When I type getenforce it says it is disabled, yet when I go to /etc/selinux and look at the config, it is in enforcing mode and not commented out, type is strict.When I go to the SELinux management GUI I can't change the current enforcing mode and it's set to disabled and default to enforcing.
View 2 Replies View RelatedMy Fedora box is giving me an SELinux security error:
Code: Summary:
SELinux is preventing the samba daemon from reading users' home directories.
Detailed Description:
SELinux has denied the samba daemon access to users' home directories. Someone
is attempting to access your home directories via your samba daemon. If you only
setup samba to share non-home directories, this probably signals an intrusion
attempt. For more information on SELinux integration with samba, look at the
samba_selinux man page. (man samba_selinux)
Allowing Access: If you want samba to share home directories you need to turn on the
samba_enable_home_dirs boolean: "setsebool -P samba_enable_home_dirs=1"
Fix Command:
setsebool -P samba_enable_home_dirs=1
Additional Information:
Source Context system_u:system_r:smbd_t:s0
Target Context unconfined_u:object_r:user_home_dir_t:s0
Target Objects /home/micah [ dir ]
Source smbd
[code]....
I am new to Fedora 10, and to SELinux too.
I would like to know how can I prevent from users with role user_r to connect to Internet with firefox.
I am running Fedora 11 and every time i plug in my iPod it tells me... SELinux is preventing mkdir (podsleuth_t) "read" security_t ... I have no idea on how to create a policy module to allow access.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI get a SELinux relabel often even without changing stuff. SELinux troubleshoot doesn't show any error nor are there any messages in /log/messages that give any clue. Where should I look to see whats happening ?
2.6.31.12-174.2.22.fc12.x86_64
selinux-policy-3.6.32-103.fc12
I have recently upgraded from FC12 to FC13, and last week I updated all packages using YUM. The system is running as a VM inside CentOS 5.5 using KVM. SELinux is enforcing, using the targeted policy. Bugzilla is version 3.6.1 and was NOT installed using RPM or YUM.
Bugzilla was working OK on this machine until SELinux was upgraded last week from 3.7.19-28 to 3.7.19-33, and is still broken after testing 3.7.19-37 from the testing repo. With SELinux in enforcing mode, apache returns error 500 when I browse to the main bugzilla page. The apache error log shows this:-
Code:
[Mon Jul 19 13:15:08 2010] [error] [client 192.168.40.1] (13)Permission denied: exec of '/var/www/html/bugzilla/index.cgi' failed
Nothing, and I mean absolutely nothing, is recorded in /var/log/audit/audit.log, /var/log/messages or /var/log/secure.
[Code]....
i get this warning from selinux :
"SELinux is preventing /bin/mailx from append access on the file /var/lib/rkhunter/rkhcronlog.OmRFCZOynG."
I tried to fix it by "# /sbin/restorecon -v /var/lib/rkhunter/rkhcronlog.OmRFCZOynG" as suggested by SELinux but it comes back with another warning, but with a different /rkhcronlog.xxxxxxxxx...
i think its just a way of rkhunter logging issue -. attached here is the actual error message by selinux.
I just install Fedora 15 and I see the SELinux Policy Genertation Tool and the SELinux Administration application in the app launcher but I do not see the SELinux Troubleshooter app. I seems to be missing. How do I get it on my system?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI need to change SELinux policy to permissive and then back to enforced for an installation. I understand that I should be able to do that through the SELinux Administration window accessed through System -> Administration ->SELinux Management. But I do not have any real sysadmin tools available in my Fedora 15 Gnome Gui interface. Am I missing something, or should I use some sort of similar command line tool to do this?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI know very little about SE Linux and I've heard that in some situations it's better to disable it. For a home user, is it important? Does it improve your life ? or does it get in the way ?
Last week some update stopped my printing and I had to install the new hplip from HP because it wasn't in the Fedora repos to correct the problem. I don't know if SELinux had anything to do with it, but today when I disabled SELinux a few minutes later I get a star up on the toolbar and when I clicked on it it mentioned something about hplip. It wouldn't make any sense to me but maybe this has happened to others.
SElinux is blocking my internet connection and every time when I connect t the internet (pppoe connection) I ge message.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCurrently working on the targeted policy, I need a help in doing the following things as quick as possible:
1- How to create a totally new SELinux user (not mapping new linux user to SELinux user) I want a new user with no roles or with a maximum of 1 role. I also need how to compile the new user so I can used it for mapping users. At the time, I've tried creating a new file inside /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/users similar to the other users inside this directory, but it did not actually seem to appear when using the command semanage to list SELinux users : semanage user -l
2- How to create a totally new SELinux role (empty for now) ? and how to make the relation between this new role and domains or types.
3- How to create new domain, actually following some old instructions I created the .fc and .te files, but not the .if file, which is more complicated than the other 2 file.
I've got a question about chattr command. is it possible to restrict a root access for this command. what i want is something similar to freebsd behaviour aka the kernel secure level. setting a particular security level results in limiting some operations (i.e changing immutable flags on files) by root. well, if someone gained an access to a machine in some way, nothing would stop him changing the file's flags. so the question is if it can be achieved with selinux?
View 2 Replies View Relatedwell after spending most of the morning getting help with my internet connection hanging when I dial up we discover that SELinux is causing it so when I set it to passive I can connect so how can I get it to allow me to connect while being set to enforcing?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI plan to install vmware but I had some problems...So I looked over the internet and I found that I must disable selinux....is this true? It means that I must have to disable the selinux for ever? And then, will my System be safe?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI want to be able to created directories and upload files (images mostly) via a php web page. The directory structure is a throwback to windows and I really really don't want to have to change it because there are so many files/links already there.
/cust/cust_name/site/version/web (all html/php files go here)
I want to be able to edit the files with a 3rd party tool (SSH based). These are small orgs, like my church, local community club, sports team, etc., so file ownership needs to sync with the editor, not apache.
[Code].....
I sue Fedora 13. Since a few times ago, every time when I start the computer, it appears a message of SELinux trouble shooter about a security alert. But most of times there are no errors to show.
View 9 Replies View RelatedI have a removable USB drive formated with NTFS. I enabled all the samba boolians in the SElinux GUI but it still doesn't seem to work. If i put it on permissive it will work. What more is there that i need to do to get my directories to show up on samba with selinux enabled?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm suspicious that the context of /etc/sudoers is wrong. During the last upgrade to Fedora 14, RPM dropped /etc/sudoers.rpmnew, which had a different context than the real sudoers file. But, when I try to get SELinux to relabel the file (using restorecon or fixfiles), it refuses to make a change.
> ls -lZ /etc/sudoers
-r--r-----. root root unconfined_u:object_r:etc_t:s0 /etc/sudoers
> matchpathcon /etc/sudoers
[code]....
After I do a recommended SELinux change from an alert:
'grep blender /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow -M mypol'
the next time I boot, I have to add the rule again. How would I make this permanent? Can this only be done with the SELinux Policy Generation Tool? I've tried making bug reports for some SELinux warnings.
I decided that I'd torture myself and try to get a server up and running with SELinux fully enabled. I so far have figured out virtual hosting, vsftpd, and SSH to work with it nicely, but I can't figure out what to do to get AWstats to be viewable through a browser with SELinux enabled. This is what I get from /var/log/messages:
Code:
Mar 19 15:09:34 localhost kernel: type=1400 audit(1237496974.987:69): avc: denied { getattr } for pid=4769 comm="httpd" path="/usr/share/awstats/wwwroot/cgi-bin/awstats.pl" dev=sda1 ino=1267968 scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:httpd_awstats_script_exec_t:s0 tclass=file
Mar 19 15:09:34 localhost kernel: type=1400 audit(1237496974.987:70): avc: denied { getattr } for pid=4769 comm="httpd" path="/usr/share/awstats/wwwroot/cgi-bin/awstats.pl" dev=sda1 ino=1267968 scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:httpd_awstats_script_exec_t:s0 tclass=file
Could someone explain to me what I should be looking for in these messages? Or what I would need to do to fix it?
I have gotten over my inability to add SELinux users and am trying to write an SELinux module on my Fedora 10 machine, standard SELinux distribution. Most of it works just fine, but I've been having strange troubles with some policy interfaces--m4 expands them to numbers rather than valid SELinux policy language. Here's what I'm getting:
seutil_read_config($1_t) ---> 679
seutil_read_src_policy($1_t) ---> 1021
files_search_etc($1_t) ---> 1875
As far as I know all of these are valid policy interfaces (I've checked them up in their respective files, and they do exist and contain what appears to be valid policy). The last one I know because I went into seutil_read_src_policy and put its contents into the module rather than the macro itself. Now, I could do the same with files_search_etc, but really I'd like the top-level macro to just work. Does anyone know what is causing this problem? I'm certain I'm using correct syntax, unless there's a whitespace rule I'm not familiar with.
A secondary problem I have, generating warnings rather than errors, is that for some reason ' s are popping up in my expanded module, right after the end of expansions of some (but not all) macros that I've defined.
I recently made a custom spin of fedora on 29th August 2009. It initially failed to go past the slash screen but a solution was found here on fedora forum. It included adding the following to kernel line in grub.
enforcing=0
I later checked SElinux and found the option to do a filesystem relabel at next boot was enabled. I rebooted the system without adding the above words "enforcing=o" and it got stuck after the the splash screen (the blue screen with a fedora bubble). I then did some more research on SElinux and filesystem relabelling. There were several comments that said that a notice is given in the event of a filesystem relabel. I went to the konsole and as root I wrote the following commands:
touch /.autorelabel
reboot
I gave my pc 20Hrs 48min and nothing happened. My HDD is 80GB but it only had 7.5GB of data. There were no messages that indicated that the filesystem relabel was in progress or even if it had started. I also tried the following command but failed:
make relabel
I have now had to edit grub.conf and added the words "enforcing=0" as it is the only way the system will go passed the splash screen.