Debian Configuration :: VPN PPTP Load On Start And Route All Traffic Through Ppp0?

Mar 28, 2016

I am in serious situation involving PPTP protocol VPN in Debian 8 Jessie stable. I recently became a paid VPN subscriber. Using PPTP; Is there a way to automatically route all traffic through ppp0? Im getting the vpn service killed (ip address goes back to normal unmasked state) whenever there is a power outage (modem reset) and there are alot of those where I live, Im going to get astabilizer and I need a software solution for the situation as well. Theres gotta be a way to route all traffic through the VPN route ppp0 . I tried adding persist and maxfail 0 to the pptp config file but it did not do what i wanted.

Here's my peer configuration file :

pty "pptp blabla.net --nolaunchpppd"
name blablabla
password blablabla
remotename PPTP
file /etc/ppp/options.pptp
require-mppe-128
refuse-eap noauth
persist
maxfail 0

On a second note, its clear to add that I basically need a way to also auto load the line

pppd call blabla.net
and
route add default dev ppp0

On system startup by default so the computer does not use "Wired" connection ^at all^ when not through ppp0. Any other way of not losing VPN anonymity ever due to hardware malfunction.

Is there a way to do this? Ive looked on the net and everything seems like its either from the nineties or can fry my pc , Im no debian expert, less than a year at linux..

Need it to use wired only if ppp0 is being used so if its no vpn, no connection at all period,

View 1 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Debian Configuration :: Tunnel All Traffic Through PPTP VPN

Dec 12, 2010

I installed the PPTP Client [URL] and can successfully connect to my VPN (creates interface ppp0). The problem is, I'm trying to tunnel all of my traffic on my system through the connection. I've seen conflicting howtos and scripts including pptpclient's documentation (the ip-up and ip-down scripts don't work). How does one simply (even if I type it manually) tunnel the traffic?

System Info:
OS: Debian Squeeze, Kernel 2.6.32-5-686
GUI: Gnome (standard one from netisnt unstable install)
Main interface: eth1
PPTP interface: ppp0

View 1 Replies View Related

Server :: PPTP Traffic - Gre Traffic Is Being Generated During The Browsing / Reduce Traffic

Sep 27, 2009

Recently I notice that when I'm connected to an vpn server (pptpd) and I'm using it as a default gateway my download and upload speed decreases almost to the half of the usual speed. I made a test using iptables in order to count how much GRE packets are generated (except the real traffic itself) in that way:

Code:
iptables -I INPUT -p gre -j ACCEPT
iptables -I OUTPUT -p gre -j ACCEPT

iptables -I FORWARD -s 172.16.10.101 -j ACCEPT
iptables -I FORWARD -d 172.16.10.101 -j ACCEPT
The first 2 rules match all GRE packets between the pptpd server and client, and the next rules - the traffic between the server and the client.

When I turn the counters to zero and begin to generate traffic (to browse, to download etc.) I see that the GRE packets are even more than these in the FORWARD chain.

So, my question is first of all is my test correct and is it true that so much gre traffic is being generated during the browsing (it becames clear that the traffic is double than if the pptpd wasn't used as a gateway) and if yes - can that traffic be reduced?

View 3 Replies View Related

OpenSUSE :: Unable To Connect PPTP (VPN) Over Ppp0 - 3G Modem (MMX 310G)?

Nov 23, 2010

I have installed and setup 3G which works perfectly fine. I use sakis3g scripts for connecting to 3G network. My VPN profile created with network manager (client/NetworkManager GUI) works well.

#cnetworkmanager --activate-connection=user,'XXXXX_vpn_singapore',wlan0,&

Now when I do the same with using using ppp0 (which is after connecting to VPN) I get the following error messages. #cnetworkmanager --activate-connection=user,'XXXXX_vpn_singapore',ppp0,&

[Code]...

View 9 Replies View Related

Server :: No Internet Traffic Through The PPTP VPN Connection?

Feb 21, 2011

everything works fine, clients can connect to the vpn server with no problems and they can ping local machines! but no internet access through the vpn connection unless i uncheck the default gateway option on my client machine which is not what i want. I want my clients to get my server's ip address. my server is behind a router (router's ip : 192.168.0.1 | server's local ip: 192.168.0.100) so i used localip 192.168.0.100 & remoteip 192.168.0.234-238 in pptpd.conf. it think there is something wrong with routing or firewall rules, because it seems that the DNS resolution works .. when i try to browse a website my browser says "Waiting for xxxxx.com..." and it stays on that stage forever ! the funny part is that google.com works fine (don't know how).

p.s :
* I have already opened the port in on my router. I even tried it locally to make sure that the router is not the problem here. * already added ms-dns 208.67.222.222 / ms-dns 208.67.220.220 to pptpd-options. (found another guide that suggested to do this, before adding these two lines even dns resolution was not working.)

View 1 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Networking :: Stop All Traffic If PPTP VPN Disconnects?

Feb 16, 2011

I use a PPTP VPN for privacy and bittorrent. I have been over all very happy, only taking about a 1/4 hit to my over all network speed. However, I recently downgraded my VPN package, and the new sever I connect through is sometimes unstable with a high throughput. Because of this I am trying to find a way to block ALL (HTTP, bittorrent, email, etc) outgoing network traffic when the VPN fails, and then resume the traffic when the VPN reconnects. Essentially forcing all data through the VPN, and creating the illusion of simply having no network connection to the outside world at all when the VPN is offline/re-connecting. This is opposed to the current situation when the VPN will fail, all my traffic will switch to direct (visible) access through my ISP, and the VPN will re-establish sometime later (2-3mins, normally. Unless I manually restart it sooner).

I have tried Google, but have only been finding information on configuring local web access outside of the VPN for the sake of speed. Information of which I cannot seem to find a way to apply to this.

View 1 Replies View Related

Networking :: How To Route Traffic To The Vpn

May 11, 2010

I've succesfullly connected to my vpn with kvpnc, but none of my traffic is going through the vpn! I dont know how to route traffic to the vpn. for instance, when I go to whatsmyip.com it still has my previous ip.

View 1 Replies View Related

Debian Configuration :: Traffic Shaping Per IP

Sep 19, 2010

I have a question regarding Traffic Shaping in Linux, Suppose I have a server on the internet (web, email or ftp) and I want to shape outgoing traffic per IP, say 256k for each destination IP. I've seen examples on the internet on how to shape traffic per IP by adding a queue for each IP, and some examples by using u32 hash if I have e.g. a /24 network, but if I have a server and I want to shape the traffic by destination IP, and of course... since it is a server on the internet I can't manually define any IPs of subnets. An example using the tc command?

View 2 Replies View Related

Networking :: Route Internet Traffic Over Second IP Address?

Mar 4, 2010

My ISP has given me 3 IP addresses to use for the internet (76.148.200.3, 76.148.200.4 and 76.148.200.5).

If I do a "wget whatismyip.com" or netcat into another server, I am appearing as 76.148.200.3.How do I change my route (command line) in linux to route internet traffic through 76.148.200.5?

Code:
# This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
# and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5).
# The loopback network interface
auto lo
code....

View 9 Replies View Related

Networking :: Route Internet Traffic Over Tun0?

Mar 28, 2010

I have eth0 and tun0. tun0 is a VPN tunnel going over eth0. Everything on the other end is setup and working fine, when I type Code: traceroute 4.2.2.1 I see my the ping is going over 192.168.2.99 (eth0). When I then type Code: route add -net 4.2.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.255 dev tun0 traceroute 4.2.2.1 I see ping is going over 10.8.0.1 (tun0) instead of eth0, so that is working

What does not work however is when I do Code: route add -net 0.0.0.0 netmask 0.0.0.0 dev tun0 traceroute 4.2.2.1 I get no ping! I believe the problem is because all traffic is routing over tun0, which means even the VPN tun0 needs to go through eth0, it can no longer do this. Is there a way around this where I can route everything except for 114.77.31.26 (which is my VPN gateway for tun0)?

View 18 Replies View Related

Networking :: Route All System Traffic To Localhost?

Mar 18, 2011

I just installed a fresh copy of debian (no GUI). I want all my traffic on bash (such as when I do ping or dig or wget, basically whatever) to be sent to localhost:8080. How can I do that? I've a ssh port forward setup that will forward all traffic arriving at my localhost:8080 to another server.

View 4 Replies View Related

Debian Configuration :: Complex Network Setup - RPI To Automatically Route Internet

Jan 26, 2016

I would like to update my network setup.

Today, I have an ADSL box which is my gateway to internet (192.168.0.1).

I have a Raspberry pi (RPI) which I use as a dhcp & dns server (192.168.0.2).

Recently my mobile phone operator installed a 4G antenna beside my home, and the bandwidth and latency are much better with my mobile phone than with my internet provider (ADSL).

I would like to install a wifi dongle on my RPI (I would get wlan0 & eth0 interfaces)

When RPI detect my shared phone connection (tethering) I would like RPI to automatically route internet:

- from authorized devices on my network to my mobile connexion (wlan0 -> mobile phone).
- from other devices to the standard ADSL internet (eth0 -> ADSL box).

I don't want any device to use the shared 4G connexion, best would be authorized devices to be selected by MAC address. How I should properly setup such a network ?

View 2 Replies View Related

Debian Configuration :: Traffic Bypasses OpenVPN

Sep 16, 2015

I'm running OpenVPN service on both debian server and client. When start connection between client and server, I expect all the computer traffic (except ARP and DHCP requests) go through created tunnel. However, when I capture packets on wlan0 on client (the only connection going outside host) using Wireshark, I can see DNS requests visible and sometimes incoming TCP traffic as well, but most of the traffic is going through tunnel as expected. I provide both configurations of client and server and client routing table for inspection. I changed server address to avoid server exploitation in the case of some big configuration mistake.

Commands to run OpenVPN services are:
Code: Select allFor client: sudo openvpn --config /etc/openvpn/client.conf &
For server: sudo openvpn --config /etc/openvpn/server.conf &

**Client routing table when VPN is OFF**
Code: Select allKernel IP routing table
Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
default         192.168.1.1     0.0.0.0         UG    1024   0        0 wlan0
192.168.1.0     *               255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 wlan0

[code]...

I searched through many forums and documentation and I found, that for all the traffic going via VPN is command: *push "redirect-gateway def1"* neccessary, however, I have leaks despite this command being in place. I already spent over 2 days with this and tried to configure it in many ways, now I have no clue what I'm missing.

View 0 Replies View Related

Debian Configuration :: Routing - Forward All Traffic To An Ip To Another Ip?

Jul 25, 2010

I need to be able to do the following: Physical Router located at 192.168.40.1 On Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid machine:

eth0 with static ip 192.168.40.2
eth1 with static ip 192.168.40.3
eth2 with static ip 192.168.40.4

Associate a virtual address to eth1 with an entirely different network address such as 192.168.50.1 Do the same (virtual address) for eth2 -- e.g. 192.168.60.1 In the application:

register phone number A at 192.168.40.1 (The application will automatically use eth0 for this)
register phone number B at 192.168.50.1
register phone number C at 192.168.60.1

Somehow forward all traffic (including the register request) sent to 192.168.50.1 to 192.168.40.1 as if the register had been made directly to 192.168.40.1. In other words, the app "sends" registration and traffic to 192.168.50.1 but then Ubuntu forwards it to 192.168.40.1 (but the app does not know that). Similarly, forward all traffic sent to 192.168.60.1 to the router at 192.168.40.1.

Do the same for the reverse, forward all traffic that the router sends back to 192.168.40.3 (eth1) to 192.168.50.1 (within the Ubuntu machine) so that the app knows it is for phone B. Similarly forward all traffic that the router sends back to 192.168.40.4 (eth2) to 192.168.60.1 so that the app knows it is for phone C. Thus, the application believes that it is registering at 3 completely separate routers on 3 completely separate networks via 3 separate network interfaces but in fact is really registering all three to the same router (but does not know that). Similarly, the router believes that it is receiving 3 separate registrations because it receives each registration request and traffic from 3 separate interfaces and thus 3 separate mac addresses (i.e., of eth0, eth1, and eth2). Traffic sent to and from the router for each of the 3 phone numbers (via eth0, eth1, and eth2) are not mixed because the translation happens in both directions.

View 10 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Networking :: Route Traffic From Wlan0 Through Eth0?

Dec 10, 2010

I'm running Linux Mint 10 . I have a wireless PCMCIA card (Linksys WPC 11 ver.3) that I've put into master mode, and I'm trying to set up my laptop as a wireless hotspot. I am very confident that I want to do this and have no interest in using a wireless router....I say that because that topic inevitably comes up with posts like this. The problem I'm having is I don't understand how to get wlan0 and eth0 to "talk" to each other...That is, I don't know how to set it up so that traffic from wlan0 goes through eth0, so that devices that connect to my hotspot can access the internet.I've seen a few guides about this, but they were either much broader in scope (i.e. much more complex), or for other distributions, etc, and it's too much for me to follow as a linux .

View 6 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Servers :: Securely Route All Traffic On The Client?

Mar 22, 2011

I am running Ubuntu Server 10.10. I have installed OpenVPN using this guide I have set up everything correctly as this guide says, but I am having problems with the config file. I want to securely route all traffic on the client to the server, how ever the server will not start. My config is below:

Quote:

#################################################
# Sample OpenVPN 2.0 config file for #
# multi-client server. #
# #
# This file is for the server side #

[Code]......

The servers ip is 10.0.0.65 and I want to assign the clients the ip range of 10.0.0.200 to 10.0.0.20 When I try to start the server I get the message Fail.

View 8 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Multiple NICs, Route Traffic Based On IP?

Apr 22, 2011

I have an Ubuntu server box with multiple NICs. I'd like to specify that all traffic bound for a certain IP range goes through one NIC, and everything else goes through the other. Does anyone know how to do that? I'm not a total newbie, but I'm also not a linux guru (but usually can google my way to a solution...usually).

ETA: Source and destination IP for routing.We have 1 NIC with a public IP, all public IP's should talk to it.Another NIC with a private IP, all private traffic should talk to this.In practice, I have some devices on a different subnet of the public IP range we have that will only talk to the private IP.

View 2 Replies View Related

Networking :: Using Route Tool To Forward Traffic Between Two Nics?

May 10, 2011

I am trying to set up a Linux box that can act as a router (and firewall later). I have a Debian 5 installation and it has two nics in it. I am trying to use the linux route command to set up a route between the two interfaces. I am finding it difficult to do. Let me explain how I am trying to set up my network: I have the ethernet cable from my modem connecting to eth0 of my Debian box, then I have eth1 connecting to a switch, which I connect all my computers and other devices to. I want to have two different ip address schemes for the devices. So here is my interfaces file:

Code:

#eth0 connects to modem
allow-hotplug eth0
iface eth0 inet static

[code]....

So I am wondering, to get my ethernet traffic from eth0 to eth1 and vice versa, do I need to make it so the Gateway for Destination 192.168.1.0 is 10.1.1.1, and for Destination 10.0.0.0, Gateway 192.168.1.0? I have looked at the linux manpage for route and I am still confused. I have also looked at the Debian networking page, but it is still unclear to me how to do this. how I am to use the route command to get this working? Or am I not even supposed to use the route command?

View 4 Replies View Related

Debian Configuration :: How To Modify Traffic Between Two Interfaces In Linux

Aug 8, 2015

I have a laptop connected to internet via wlan0. I also have eth0 interface and with it I share internet. I want to modify/filter all the traffic passing by the first laptop, something like this:

Code: Select all                    *---------------------------*
                    |        LAPTOP 1           |      *--------------* ?
                    |-----*    *------*    *----*      |              |
    INTERNET<------>|wlan0|<-->|MY_APP|<-->|eth0|<---->|ANOTHER LAPTOP|
                    |-----*    *------*    *----|      |              |
                    *---------------------------*      *--------------*

I know that in FreeBSD it is possible to use ipfw for that purpose, because it build-in into kernel. We set for example rule Code: Select allipfw add divert 2000 ip from any to 1.0.1.1

and we can use our own application to process those packets, reinject them forward etc. It will work also fast, because as I said, it build into kernel.

Is there any standart Linux-based solution to do the same? I found some info about netmap-ipfw. Is this a correct solution? Or I have to use for example IP-aliases and iptables to do that?

I need to process all the IP-packets, not only TCP/UDP/etc-protocol. Solution also must be very fast.

View 0 Replies View Related

Debian Configuration :: Redirecting Traffic Through SOCKS Proxy?

Aug 11, 2010

I would like to redirect traffic coming from a machine A through a SOCKS proxy (setted on machine B)Machine B run "ssh -D 4242". So that create a SOCKS proxy on machine B.Machine A would like to connect on the internet, but the only way is to use machine B SOCKS proxy. The problem is machine A don't know how to use SOCKS Proxy. (Actually, i can just set ip, netmask and gateway on machine A).So, I would like to set up something on machine B that will redirect all traffic coming from machine A throught the SOCKS proxy.

View 1 Replies View Related

Debian Configuration :: Torrent Traffic Very Slow / Make It Up?

Jul 10, 2011

I am running on debian squeeze 6.0.2. I have been using it for the last id say 3 weeks and really am enjoying it.

I generally use transmission-gtk to share files over the internet. Normally I seed torrents at 110-160kb/s for hours at a time. However after messing around with firestarter my upload speed for seeding torrents rarely peaks over 70kb/s. I have purged firestarter with no success of my regular upload speed, and am very confused as to what happened. I also notice sometimes when it will get to about 70kb/s it will immediately drop down to the 20-30kb/s range.

For incoming bittorrent connections I use port 37294. I have set port 37294 to be allowed in my firewall, and forwarded in my router (since purging firestarter did not help I just reinstalled it).

I have also read allowing ports 6881-6889 is important, but I have never done that in my history of using torrents, and I have never experienced a decrease in UL speed like this.

Have I done something incorrect? I have never had this issue on other machines?

View 2 Replies View Related

Networking :: Route Traffic From A Single Host Through A Specific Interface?

Aug 21, 2010

I have a linux router with 2 physical ISPs and a VPN tunnel that all my traffic passes through. I would like to setup a rule to redirect all traffic from one internal IP address (10.0.0.x) through the physical link only. My current script is as follows.

iptables -F
iptables -X
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward

[code]....

My goal is to do something similar to the mangle on the tor traffic, but for an entire host.

View 2 Replies View Related

Networking :: Route All Traffic Received By An Interface To Another And Vice Versa?

Mar 2, 2011

The task I am trying to complete is the virtualization of an IPv6 router created using two fedora machines. Here is the physical setup I have now...

PC1:eth0 <------> network
PC1:eth1 <------> PC2:eth0
PC1:eth2 <------> PC2:eth1

PC1 runs radvd to provide router advertisements to the network and a DHCPv6 server for stateful addresses.Each interface is configured on a separate subnet. PC2 runs a DNS server on eth0. PC2:eth1 is used as an IPv6 client for testing purposes. The connections from PC1 to PC2 are just crossover cables.I've created virtual machines of both PCs and have created 4 virtual adapters on the host machine for each of the local-only interfaces.Now I have this:

PC1:eth0 = HOST eth0
PC1:eth1 = HOST vboxnet0
PC1:eth2 = HOST vboxnet1

[code]....

View 2 Replies View Related

Networking :: Unable To Route Traffic Based On Packet Content

May 7, 2011

My linux machine is connected to the outside internet, and I have a minecraft server running on an internal machine (192.168.1.201). Right now, I am forwarding port 80 on the linux machine to 192.168.1.30, which is working.

iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -i eth0 -d 192.168.1.30 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.201
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE
iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 80 -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j DNAT --to 192.168.1.201

______________________________

I want to filter out the GET/POST requests and forward them to port 8080. I can't seem to get that working.

I've tried this:

iptables -A INPUT -d 192.168.1.30 -p tcp --dport 80 -m string --algo bm --string 'GET' -j REDIRECT --to-ports 8080

View 1 Replies View Related

Debian Configuration :: IPTABLES Protocol To Reject All Incoming Ssh Traffic

Apr 4, 2010

a good IPTABLES protocol to reject all incoming ssh trafiic except for a single IP or IP range?

View 4 Replies View Related

Debian Configuration :: IPTables - Local Host Cannot Get Returning Traffic

Sep 20, 2010

I have a strange iptables issues. I have just built a new Debian install and starting adding some real basic rules (see below) the problem seems to be that the localhost itself can't get any returning traffic. That is, it seems to be allowed outgoing traffic but not the connected, returning traffic. Ordinarily allowing Established Connections would resolve this, see the rule below, but it hasn't. Why this doesn't work. Removing the last DROP in the INPUT chains obviously makes the traffic work!

iptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
iptables -A INPUT -j ACCEPT -p tcp --dport 22
iptables -A INPUT -j ACCEPT -s x.x.x.x
iptables -A INPUT -j ACCEPT -s x.x.x.x
iptables -A INPUT -j ACCEPT -s x.x.x.x -p tcp --dport 80
iptables -A INPUT -j ACCEPT -s x.x.x.x -p tcp --dport 8080
iptables -I INPUT 1 -i lo -j ACCEPT
iptables -A INPUT -j DROP

View 3 Replies View Related

Debian Configuration :: Routng Traffic To A Website Via A Specific Interface

Jul 30, 2011

I am running Debian Squeeze on an old pc (AMD K62-500) which serves as my multiwan router and torrent box. Internet uplink is provided via a dsl line and 2 wireless canopy modules.

Setup has been generally fine except when connecting/downloading as free user from sites like rapidshare, hotfile, filesonic, etc. The problem arises when I am connected to these sites using the wireless uplinks because of the shared public ip. I don't really download that much using direct download methods so I don't really see myself being a premium user from these sites.

If these sites are on a specific ip or ip range, an entry on the static routing table would have been fine but when I tried using ping, a different ip would appear to reply each time.

I wonder if there can be a solution like using iptables where in traffic to and from these sites will only use the NIC connected to the dsl line.

View 1 Replies View Related

Networking :: Most Common Method To Route Network Traffic As A Router/proxy

Apr 22, 2011

I am using Debian 5 and I have some networking experience, however I want to learn to do this the best way possible. I have a Debian box with two nics and I want to connect that to a switch and use my Debian box as a router basically, as well as having a firewall setup within that too.

Should I use iptables to set up nat or the route command or what? I just want to know the group of tools to use in order to set up my network. Network diagram: Internet <------> Debian Box <----> switch <----> hosts I found some guides but they are for linux 2.4 and i'm not sure if they are right.

View 1 Replies View Related

Networking :: IPtables: Route Outgoing Traffic From Internal Host To Only Go A Internet Interface?

Nov 21, 2010

My Ubuntu Box has 3 interfaces. eth0 (Internal 192.168.1.0/24)eth1 (External ISP DHCP)eth2 (External ISP Static IP)I need the outgoing traffic to internet for 1 of the internal pc (192.168.1.10) to only go only go through eth2

View 4 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Networking :: PPTP Server Some Websites Don't Load?

Jun 24, 2011

Running Ubuntu 11.04 Server 32bit fresh install

I did this walk-through trying both iptables and ufw

I am able to connect to my VPN server using both windows 7 and Ubuntu desktop just fine, and using wireshark verify that all packets are being compressed and sent through the VPN tunnel.

Many sites work but there are several that will not load while using the VPN, one of them is ubuntu forums also sourceforge.

I can ping the servers while connected but the websites just will not load, and time out. The second I disconnect from the VPN they load instantly.

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved