Looks like my firefox has been compromised and i have a packet sniffer. Not sure what to do.Should I just delete the suspicous files? here's the chkrootkit log:
ROOTDIR is `/'
Checking `amd'... not found
Checking `basename'... not infected
[code]....
this is the allert i got:Code:Summary:Your system may be seriously compromised! /usr/sbin/NetworkManager tried to loada kernel module.Detailed Description:SELinux has prevented NetworkManager from loading a kernel module. All confinedprograms that need to load kernel modules should have already had policy writtenfor them. If a compromised application tries to modify the kernel this AVC willbe generated. This is a serious issue.Your system may very well be compromised.Allowing Access:Contact your security administrator and report this issue.Additional Information:
Source Context system_u:system_r:NetworkManager_t:s0
Target Context system_u:system_r:NetworkManager_t:s0
Target Objects None [ capability ]
[code]....
What the best method is for checking for rootkits? I have heard that it is best not to install and run these programs on the distro itself. Would it be possible to install them on another distro/partition and then use them to check for rootkits on my main partition/distro (Ubuntu)?
View 9 Replies View RelatedToday any web browser I use has randomly been brining me to URL... at random intervals.I've run chkrootkit from a live cd, and rkhunter, clamav, f-prot, and bitdefender, nothing's unusual.All the definitions were up to date.I'm wondering if its possible that my router got hacked. I'm not sure this is even possible, but it's acting weird. Tried reflashing its firmware, didn't fix it.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI am going through the motions of testing the checkrootkit and rootkit hunter applications on one of our servers. I wanted to get feedback from those who know both as to which of the two is better at 'sniffing' out rootkits. Alternatively, can both be installed without their interfering with the other?
View 4 Replies View RelatedLet's say you have a host with some kind of locally installed root kit detector/scanner.
If someone managed to get root access to that box. Wouldn't the first thing to do, before installing a root kit, be to remove any kind root kit detector?
A site belonging to the Savannah GNU free software archive was attacked recently, leading to a compromise of encrypted passwords and enabling the attackers to access restricted project material.The compromise was the result of a SQL injection attack against the savannah.gnu.org site within the last couple of days and the site is still offline now. A notice on the site says that the group has finished the process of restoring all of the data from a clean backup and bringing up access to some resources, but is still in the middle of adjusting its security settings.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have an OpenSSH server running on Ubuntu 10.04, and it works fine.
I'm concerned that my SSH key may have been compromised and would like to replace it.
I tried replacing keys before and reinstalling OpenSSH and SSH before but ran into terrible trouble so I'm asking for instruction before touching anything this time.
Code:
laeg@skyrocket:~/.ssh$ ls
authorized_keys id_rsa id_rsa.ppk id_rsa.pub known_hosts
Code:
laeg@skyrocket:/etc/ssh$ ls
[Code]....
So can I just synpaptic 'fully' uninstall SHH (although probably even less necessary than..) and OpenSHH, backup sshd_config, delete the two dirs referenced above, reinstall both packages, insert my sshd_config backup, and then start from scratch following the guides linked below?
I ran a chkrootkit scan and found this: The following suspicious files and directories were found: /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/.path /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2.8/.autoreg /usr/lib/firefox 3.6.8/.autoreg /usr/lib/jvm/.java-6-openjdk.jinfo
How do I get rid of this suspicious file?
The infrastructure of the Fedora Project was compromised over the weekend and an account belonging to a Fedora contributor was taken over by an attacker. However, Fedora officials said they don't believe that the attacker was able to push any changes to the Fedora package system or make any actual changes to the infrastructure.
The attack appears to have targeted one specific user account, which had some high-value privileges. The attacker was able to compromise the account externally, and then had the ability to connect remotely to some Fedora systems. The attacker also changed the account's SSH key, Fedora officials said.
I have a server connected to the internet placed in a DMZ that was running ProFTPD. A couple of weeks ago there was a security threat uncovered that would grant access to external users through a buffer overflow. Of course I patched my ProFTPD quite often after that to secure my server. Now my problem is that the servers of ProFTPD were compromised and that source code with a back-door was released. To make matters worse compromised systems notify the hacker they are infected. is there any way to ensure I don't have a root-kit installed short of reinstalling the system?
View 4 Replies View RelatedTwo days ago we started to receive the following message:
/etc/cron.daily/chkrootkit:
The following suspicious files and directories were found:
/lib/init/rw/.mdadm /lib/init/rw/.ramfs
/lib/init/rw/.mdadm
INFECTED (PORTS: 4369)
You have 2 process hidden for ps command
chkproc: Warning: Possible LKM Trojan installed
And about at the same time (a day before that) we have set up new rules for the queueing disciplines using 'tc' on our Debian lenny box (these rules are for some of the experiments we are carrying out). I have ran the chkrootkit manually and this message (as above) keeps appearing, while the rkhunter tool does not complain about these items. Could there be a connection between setting up the new qdisc's and the chkrootkit "INFECTED" messages?
second time clamav detects the malware on laptop underubuntu:winnow.compromised.ts.jsexploit.5.UNOFFICIALwinnow.spam.ts.domains.158.UNOFFICIALgspace.js: winnow.malware.cm.miscspam.387929.UNOFFICIALwhat does this mean, is it serious and what is the origin of this infection?
View 9 Replies View RelatedI just noticed the results of the Honeynet Project's Challenge 7: Forensic Analysis of a Compromised Server have finally been posted today. Just got done reading one of the submissions and it's pretty good if anyone is interested in how to analyze a Linux incident involving evidence from memory and the file system.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhen installing these progs on Lucid it comes with exim4,I noticed this in the terminal output. What has exim4 to do with rkhunter and/or chkrootkit?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI just found these in my setroubleshoot logs and what the hell is going on:
Quote:
Summary:
Your system may be seriously compromised!
Detailed Description:
[SELinux is in permissive mode. This access was not denied.]
SELinux has prevented semodule from modifying $TARGET. This denial indicates semodule was trying to modify the selinux policy configuration. All applications that need this access should have already had policy written for them. If a compromised application tries to modify the SELinux policy this AVC will be generated. This is a serious issue. Your system may very well be compromised.
Allowing Access:
Contact your security administrator and report this issue.
Additional Information:
Source Context staff_u:staff_r:staff_t:s0
Target Context system_u:object_r:semanage_store_t:s0
Target Objects modules [ dir ]
[code]....
This isn't even the half of it either, there are other warnings in between them about netfilter_contexts unlink operations and /usr/sbin/semodule "rmdir" operations on modules.
All I can remember doing earlier was switching into permissive mode to change the type of a WINE application, the legitimacy of which - for system security purposes - I don't doubt. That, and generating policy for it which I tried running the install script for after changing the type didn't work. Neither of those actions seem like they'd try to remove the modules directory.
Suckit rootkit... Warning: /sbin/init INFECTED
How can I remove this guys? using fedora 15 64bits
how to install chkrootkit, rkhunter and zenmap in suse 11.2 kde
View 9 Replies View RelatedI run Ubuntu 9.04 and was recently told by my university that my computer is massively port scanning the network. I am interesting in learning more about figuring out what is happening to stop it, but I am lost at where to begin. What steps should I take (or files to look at) to figure out what is happening?
View 3 Replies View RelatedMy Linux server which is running my company website have been hacked. Today I saw a number of clients (customers) with some fun characters entries on my database. Access denial on really clients.
View 2 Replies View Relatedubuntu 9.10 login panel is worse with respect to ubuntu 8 since now all the users with names are shown without a way to hide them!Why don't keep the old way at least as an option?
View 5 Replies View RelatedTo avoid having to input a password for the keyring each time I connect to the net via wireless, I enabled the 'Available to all users' option in Network Manager. Now, my question is this. Are the 'users' it refers to just those created on this machine? Would a drive-by be able to use my network without entering the password?
View 3 Replies View Related1. I understand you can protect your files or directories in your website by setting file/directory permissions. The meaning of r w x is clear to me, but I'm not sure how to proceed... Starting with the index.html file, if I wanted to make it so that anyone in the world can read it but can't modify it, do I set its permissions to rwxr-xr-x? If I set it to rwxr--r--, would that mean the file couldn't be served? I mean, what does the x setting do on a .html file, how can a .html file be executable?
2. If file permissions work on the lines of owner-group-others, in the context of a website, who is 'group'? As far as I can tell, there's only the owner, which is me, and others, which is the world accessing the site. Am I correct in thinking that by default, say when creating a website on a shared hosting server, there is no group unless I specifically set one up?
3. My ISP allows the DynDNS.org service, meaning that I could serve a website from my home. It's too early to go that route just yet, but for future reference, I would like to ask about the server software called Hiawatha. It is said to be secure, but having read some evaluations of it, it doesn't seem to offer anything that couldn't be accomplished with Apache or Cherokee, it's just that its security settings are simpler and easier to configure. Am I right about this? Or does Hiawatha truly offer something that the other major server packages don't?
i updated both browsers i have and lost my secure log-in pages (no padlocks showing ) concerning different Web mail accounts.Just before i did these updates i checked an unrelated thing on-line regarding my sound card of which i kept a copy of and got this message below :
!!ALSA/HDA dmesg
!!------------------
[ 12.762633] cfg80211: Calling CRDA for country: AM
[code]....
Conky can be used to display a variety of information on the users desktop. I wanted to use Conky instead to display the current status of security as reported by:
SANS Internet Storm Center
IBM Internet Security Systems
Symantec Threatcon
McAfee Threat Center
I therefore created 4 small scripts which download the current status from these sites, and set the colour of those status's depending on the current value.The conky configuration allows for a semi-transparent background - though this is optional.Attached is an example image showing the 4 different colours.Also attached is an archive with the 4.sh files, .conkyrc and draw_bg.lua (from here http:[url].....
I just installed Ubuntu on a desktop. Can anyone give me some guidance on installing basic security software? In particular, I'm looking for a firewall, antivirus, and anti-spyware/malware utilities.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI already posted a topic similar to this concerning the Desktop OS version, but this deals with the Netbook because unlike the Desktop, the Netbook is less cooperative. Allow me to elaborate: Today (or rather yesterday since it's not after midnight where I am), I changed my password because I was hopelessly confounded about how to get my Wireless Network card up and running after it had been installed and I was allowing my dad to use it. This issue has since been resolved, however...
When I chose my password during the original installation, there was no mention of it being "too simple." This is where the Desktop OS and the Netbook OS differ. The desktop will let me change it in the terminal without any errors. The Netbook will not. When I've attempted to revert it back to the original, it will not let me do so in the User Profile or in the Terminal. The Passwords and Encryption Keys application also does not appear to help.
So now even after I've changed it to a different "complicated" password I am still prompted to insert two different passwords since I changed my user password but I am unable to change the password I input during the installation. A bit screwy methinks. This is extremely important. I'd like to know how to change the original installation password.
If I can't change the main password on my laptop then this is a serious potential security breach just waiting to happen (especially since it's on a laptop and I will be hauling it around with me) and I will most likely install a different OS if this isn't resolved --- It would be very unfortunate since I spent the whole day fixing it and I really enjoy the interface. Luckily I can live with this on my Desktop since I'm not going to be hauling it around with me everywhere when the school year starts.
As it stands I have a small home network operating behind my modem/router. Some of the ports on this are forwarded to my PS3 for gaming but I was looking at forward some for my file server.
At the moment I've forwarded port xxx22 to port 22 on my server for SSH for instance. ANd similarly 21 for FTP (although it doesnt seem to want to connect for any more than a few seconds using that). What I was thinking of doing was placing a small website for a handful of ppl to use on the server too and port forward again - xxx80 to 80. It works just fine but I'm a little concerned on the security front.
As I've moved the port to something different from the outside world I'm presuming I will have already cut the potential for malicious folks to wander in but is there anything else I should be doing? At the moment there's no firewall operating on the server, usually as its hidden behind the modem/router. But if I open this thign up more permanently what should I be doing? I've read a few articles on it but I'm always left with the overwhelming thought of "Thats if theres no firewall in my router" as they just seem to do the same.
When posting results from ifconfig, it shows the hardware address of etho, etc. Would you consider that to be a security risk ?
View 9 Replies View RelatedI'm concerned about security of having a LAMP server on my laptop as having any server makes the system less secure. However, if I were to create a new partition and install a lamp server on that and only use it when offline, would the security of my main partition be affected at all?
View 3 Replies View Related