I have an Apache, PureFTPd, PHP5, and MySQL server setup and running. I'm running several scripts that require folder access of "var/www" in order to accomplish the scripts duty. How do I remove and/or work around the security measure?
View 7 Replies
While saving a file I made a typo and performed the vi command ':w~' instead of ':w!' and I created a root '~' instance in one of my subdirectories. How do I remove this reference without wiping out the entire main /root /~ directory? Do I use unlink()?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am going to remove root access via SSH which seems fine but I don't know how to add a new user, do I have to create a group first or are there existing groups I can add a user to, and does it matter which group I add a user to if I want this user to have root access with sudo?
View 11 Replies View RelatedI took some videos off a usb flash drive, then went and selected " safely remove usb" and the light continued to blink on the flashdrive, I pulled it out any way, and the root folder turned red... everything seems ok, but how do you know when it's ok to safely remove a usb devise ?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI just noticed on my Ubuntu machine (ext3 filesystem) that removing write permissions from a file does not keep root from writing to it. Is this a general rule of UNIX file permissions? Or specific to Ubuntu? Or a misconfiguration on my machine? Writing to the file fails (as expected) if I do this from my normal user account.Is this normal behavior?Is there a way to prevent root from accidentally writing to a file (Preferably using normal filesystem mechanisms, not AppArmor, etc.)
I understand that root has total control over the system and can, eg, change the permissions on any file.My question is whether currently set permissions are enforced on code running as root. The idea is the root user preventing her/himself from accidentally writing to a file. also understand that one should not be logged in as root for normal operations.
what i did was, remove evolution mail from synaptic, what i wanted to do was just remove the indicator applet from the task bar. i read a bunch of bad stuff about removing evolution from synaptic vs just removing the applet.
im worried. did i break anything or put my security at risk. after, i used a command (older) (sudo apt-get install ubuntu-desktop)to install ubuntu desktop. because i thought that it would fix evolution. then i went to synaptic and installed a package called evolution. i rechecked evolution in applications menu. however, i notice that i have both a checkable evolution and two evolution icons. nothing 'seems' broken. im not sure if it ever was. and evolution calender pops up as normal, as does the the installed plain evolution. they both seems to be an exact copy of the other.
all i really wanted to do was remove the indicator applet. did i make a serious mistake. since ive had ubuntu, ive reformatted a lot because i was worried i made a mistake of some kind. however now im into the more "make a mistake and fix it stage' as im pretty happy with my current desktop and have worked hard to customize it. the command, sudo apt-get remove indicator-messages removed the mail icon. i still am worried that i broke something, or put my security at risk. also, now i have two mail icons. evolution mail and calendar, and another just called evolution.
I try to understand the reasons for restricting DVD and MP3. My conclusion so far is that DVD is restricted due to software patents (and the DMCA). The software decoding DVD is open software, though. What is the situation regarding MP3? It is also restricted. Is it due to the same kind of software patents? As I understand, the MP3 codecs are not free software (like DVD)?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI know a bunch of commands and I am comfortable using the terminal, I even set a powerpc server but I can't figure out how to remove epiphany on this new computer I'm setting up. I didn't install anything with tasksel. I installed gnome and xorg afterwards... I load it up and 'startx' just fine. then I check around for the programs that were installed. I lik'em gimp, lot's of utilities. gedit. anyway I find epiphany, which I have already established that I dislike, I immediately go to the root terminal (another nice program that comes with gnome) and type apt-get remove epiphany-browser-data the output says it will be deleting gnome... however I have researched and found these are simpy meta packages that don't really matter.... however under the section that states all the packages that will be removed by autoremove there is a huge list... I doubt these packages are safe to remove. how to remove epiphany without removing a huge amount of probably needed software
View 14 Replies View RelatedI have a server with two active network interfaces. On one, I need ssh open for all users (it's running LTSP, and as I learned the hard way today, blocking ssh kills LDM access).
On the other interface (which connects to the rest of the network), I only want to allow a few administrative users to connnect.
Is there a way to do this cleanly using sshd_config or PAM? I don't want to do something hacky like running dropbear.
These should be my last pleas for help with regard to Fedora 13. I've been unable to turn off the notifications that appear in the top right corner, despite a decent amount of searching on google. I can't remove any notifications package without removing a bunch of important software along with it. Also, F13 refuses to "Safely Remove" either of my external disks. I have to yank out the usb cord, touching wood each time.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI've got Ubuntu server 10.04 set up and I wanted to make a few restrictions. It's pretty much just acting as a VMware server at the moment, and there are some users I've created who I only want to be able to be able to log into the VMware infrastructure web interface. I want to make sure these users can't log in via SSH, FTP, or the console itself. I understand how to block them from logging in via SSH by using DenyUsers, and I added these users to the /etc/ftpusers file to lock them out of FTP, but how can I block them from logging in at the console itself?
I tried locking the user out by editing the /etc/passwd file, but the problem is that by doing this, it also prevents the user from being able to log into the VMware web interface.
The user's entry in /etc/passwd looks like this: bsmith:*:1005:1005:Bob Smith,,,:/home/bsmith:/bin/bash
does anyone know how to set restrictions on the commands a user can run as sudo? i want to make it so they can only halt the system.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHow can I get rid of all policykit restrictions that fedora 13 has? I just upgraded from fedora 10 and of course my freenx sessions are again unable to do anything useful like mounting a drive. Difference is no GUI now to help fix this. So I would like to get rid of all restrictions.
View 6 Replies View RelatedBeen trying for some time to get Postfix to not allow some internal users to send email externally. I have found some good resources online but none of them work. The user is still able to send email internally and externally.
I used the following web pages to assist me... [URL]
Below is my main.cf
# See /usr/share/postfix/main.cf.dist for a commented, more complete version
# Debian specific: Specifying a file name will cause the first
# line of that file to be used as the name. The Debian default
# is /etc/mailname.
[Code]....
Is there a program available that would allow me to create an index in a pdf file that has no security restrictions on it? I know people can lock there files so I am not worried about thise but if I have open permissions on a pdf file how do I go about creating an index. It seems that by default you get the thumbnail view but I like to be able to click on a index list to go to a page.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm working with Opensuse 11.2 and KDE 4.3.5. I tried to restrict the run command (with Alt-F2) in the kdeglobals file:
~/.kde4/share/config/kdeglobals
[KDE Action Restrictions]
run_command=false
But there is no effect. With Opensuse 10.3 and KDE 3.5 it works fine.
I usually use .htaccess to restrict access to directories. But what if I just wanted to secure a single php file? Is there some sort of code that would allow me to say ONLY THIS IP can access this PHP file?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI set some restrictions in /etc/pam.d/system-auth, but they don't seem to be affecting anything.
/etc/pam.d/passwd:
Code:
password required pam_cracklib.so retry=3 minlen=8
password required pam_unix.so md5 shadow use_authtok
/etc/pam.d/system-auth:
Code:
auth required pam_env.so
auth sufficient pam_unix.so likeauth nullok
auth required pam_deny.so
[code]....
I dont want to allow the user winny on saturday and sundays. I added the following line in the /etc/security/time.conf file.
login;*;winny;!SaSu0000-2400
Then i added the following line in the /etc/pam.d/login file.
account required pam_time.so
this is the first line of that login file. But if i tried to login with the username winny it allows me to get log in. Is anything has to be change?
i have jsut setup a kvm virtual machine on my server. to connect to the VM from outside of the network i use ssh tunneling. what i would liek to know is if there is any way to create a new user with jsut ssh access. i dont want people to be able to edit files in ~/ or such. jsut need the user to estabilish the connection to the server
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have searched for days on Google and can't find a clear answer to my question. I have a NT4 PDC which I am migrating to Samba 3 (Version 3.4.2-47.fc12) on FC12 with kernel(2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686). I am using tdbsam as my passdb backend.I setup Samba as a BDC and then joined to NT4 Domain succesfully. When I go to vampire the accounts I get lots of errors and some user accounts get transfered over. It turns that all the user accounts that transfer are those that don't have a capital letter in their username on the NT4 domain server. Most do and don't get transfered. There seems to be errors with my groups and Computer accounts.Is there a way to change the requirements in Fedora 12 for username, groups and computernames?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have Fedora 10 installed. I want my users to be able to use any password they want. So I edited /etc/pam.d/system-auth, the password section.
Was:
Code:
password requisite pam_cracklib.so try_first_pass retry=3
password sufficient pam_unix.so md5 shadow nullok try_first_pass use_authtok
password required pam_deny.so
Become:
[Code].....
I have a work network of about 20 boxes most of which are running Windows 7 and one of them is a file server using linux and another is Windows server 2003. Now the local IP is distributed by the router, and no regulation of internet access is done by any of the servers.What I need to do is restrict internet access to select domains, which would probably need DHCP through linux(I think, not really sure), and I need something simple like a 'blabla.conf' file with the allowed websites that I can edit. need to know how to regulate IP addresses through the linux box (all details if possible, I never tried to do that before), and how to restrict internet access also through linux.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a computer with two interfaces (eth0 and eth1), eth0 is connected with a local network and eth1 is connected to the internet, also it implements a NAT in the interface eth1. Nevertheless, I'm trying to create spoofed packets with sockets raw in the computer that runs the NAT and send the packets to the interface eth1. The problem is that the NAT is changing the IP source to the real one before send the packets. So, anyone have any idea how can I implements the NAT in eth1 but only apply the NAT to the packets that are from/to eth0? I was thinking in something like (I am really newbie with iptables):
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -i eth0 -j MASQUERADE
Well, it didn't work.
While I successfully configured an IPsec-VPN (I use a similar tho modified setup like this:[URL].. I am now stuck on the next steps. While I can connect to everything I want, I need to configure "access-groups" and/or "users".
The scenario is similar to this: Lets say Host A, B and C allow SSH-Connections and some weird non-standard UDP-Connection from Host-VPN, and are also accessible on other ports with public IP's (like http).
I now want to limit, that an admin-user has access to all of them, while trainee-admin only can access everything on Host B and C, and CEO only can connect via telnet to Host C - and all users can be roadwarriors
(I made this example up to give you an idea what i'm trying to do - hope it makes sense). Now my question is, if someone can point me towards a direction, as I'm quite clueless at the current moment as to what to try. I know that commercial IPsec-Implementations can do this, but can OpenSWAN/... give me something similar?
I am using internet web control through squid... All is working fine only some little bit issues.
(1) Sometime when i tried to open google.com or any site I got message (The requested URL could not be retrieved) Screen Shot Attached.) but again after sometimes same websites will open.
url
(2) I would like to block word 'sex'.. So I have edit squid.conf with the following acl
acl Blockword url_regex sex
http_access deny Blockword
but problem occur in some websites where 'sensex' word found in url. Then squid block 'sensex' url content website also..
I have a user that has already used up a demo 24hr trial on my website. At present, I only check the customer id and the IP address to search for duplicates. On the whole this works but it's not foolproof. We now have 1 user from China that is changing their IP address everyday to get access to the free trial. Any options on what to do? I thought of downloading a cookie to their computer that the website could pick up - again not foolproff but most people don't disable cookies. Any other options?
I could ban China temporarily until the user gives up but if they find another proxy to chain then their IP address will be different again.
I have searched other post on here and they appear to be relevant but when I enter in the exact same commands it denies relay access to everyone. I have also used the postmap command to refresh the database.
Feb 16 15:54:48 EMAIL2 postfix/smtpd[6512]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from localhost[127.0.0.1]: 554 5.7.1 <josh.dobs@gmail.com>: Recipient address rejected: Relay access denied; from=<msolis@EMAIL2.drewmedical.com> to=<josh.dobs@gmail.com> proto=ESMTP helo=<192.168.1.51>
I used this page as reference. [URL]
Below is my main.cf
# See /usr/share/postfix/main.cf.dist for a commented, more complete version
# Debian specific: Specifying a file name will cause the first
# line of that file to be used as the name. The Debian default
# is /etc/mailname.
[Code]....
I seem to be able to install / configure Postfix server in 10 minutes as an MTA for a single domain but my struggle is really understanding the maps / restrictions which even after reading "The Book of Postfix" is not very clear to me:
[Code]....
My question is between those commonly used three maps above, what are the difference between them and how do I know when to use one over the other? Can someone clearly explain them to me? Here's what I have in my 'main.cf' but honestly I couldn't tell you if they're correct or now:
[Code]....
I'm trying to configure notifying 'sys admins' cellulars about some events in clients IT infrastructure. In linux env it would be ease, just to use 'mail' cmd but need solution for windows env in this case.
I have RAID Controller running under windows xp and its raid array sotfware has feature to notify about events by email. I found some free solutions on the internet but most of them are shareware and if are freeware, they have limitations e.g. nr of sent emails per day.
Is there some free smtp server that I can use with no limitations?
