I ran the LiveCD of Fedora SecurityLab and noticed these ports open, 111,631, 34526.How can I close them and what runs behind them. I know 111 is rpcbind, 631 ipp and 34526 is unknown.
View 4 RepliesI'm still new to PHP and SQL, but all the tutorials I've found connect to the database like this:
PHP Code:
Right now I'm just doing local network tests before exposing everything to the Internet.
Wouldn't leaving the password in there as plain text be a huge security issue? I tried downloading the php file off the server, and it just comes down blank. So does PHP already have a security feature that doesn't allow anyone to just nab PHP files off the server?
And for Postgre, I have pg_hba.conf set up to "trust" it's own IP address:
Code:
Would I need to use something like Kerberos, PAM, or ident authentication? Right now the only plan is to use it as login system for a website. The clients themselves won't be accessing the DB itself, because all the DB access will be through PHP.
I am creating an FTP server using VSFTP. It will be in the wild, initially at least only functioning as an FTP server. I have the iptables config from the previous box I set up 3-4 years ago. I have also got private/public key authentication running with SSH to eliminate brute force attacks.
Here is where is my specific question. On the old server I set up something that allowed my clients to log in using accounts that were not system accounts but would translate to a single system account that was limited to FTP. I remember setting up a passwd account that had username / password pairs that FTP used for authentication.
What app is this? Is it just part of VSFTP or maybe SELInux? I really want to utilize this.
I have to deploy a server to some customers that should not be given access to the server itself. I know that nothing is 100% secure but I've searched without finding a decent answer (maybe I googled for the wrong terms ?)I need some advice about encrypted filesystem. * The server must boot without asking for a passphrase (the server will be in a restricted access area so typing a password could take a while). I can't store the password for luks in an unencrypted file so it seems a loop to me. The only way out I can see is to store the passphrase in the boot binaries (better than nothing...) but this results in more work for me.* possibly the customer should not be able to move the hard disks to another pc, i.e. reading the passphrase from some unique hardware ID. This is risky but I could add a master passphrase to be used in case of hardware replacement
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am pretty new to the Fedora 11 world. I have maradns installed on it and I'm using it as my server. What is the best way to make my machine secure. This is just a project of mine so I can become familiar with sys admin on Fedora. It doesn't have to be ultra secure, just a decent level of security would be nice. Any links or information would be greatly appreciated. Btw, I currently have selinux disabled. I'm not familiar with it and it was giving me problems so I had to disable it.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am relatively new to linux having only used ubuntu 9.10. Trouble is for all the talk of how secure ubuntu is, truth is it kept getting remote hacked (I have a stalker who is messing with me) over and over so now I am going to try fedora in hopes of finally having a secure system. My question is, what steps do I need to take to try to secure Fedora 12?
View 9 Replies View RelatedI run Slackware 13.0 and I have an apache server 2.2.13 with a postgresql 8.4.1 database attached to it via php 5.3.0. Both the apache server and the postgresql database are on the same machine.
I have the apache server port 80 exposed to the WAN. It is not a fqdm, it's just a simple IP address. On my index page, a user can login with a user/password that encrypts to md5 via postgresql and takes them into the database.
Here is the vulnerability. Can't a hacker just scan port 80 and find my ip address running apache. Go to my index page, see that I accept user/password for authentication into my postgresql database. Then they could setup a script to simply inject html GET requests of random users and passwords and use those values on the php page(the one where the action link is pointing to in the form tag) that contains user login/password in php to login to my postgresql database. There's nothing stopping that. It would be a simple dictionary attack.
I checked out postgresql documentation and it suggested using ldap, kerberos, or md5 and not trust. I'm using md5 already. I currently use fail2ban for proftpd and sshd and it works great. After 6 failed user/pass attempts on either of these services, the IP gets banned via iptables for 24 hours. I love it. I was wondering if I could use that. Of course postgresql port is not exposed to the WAN which is a good thing. I know that when I put in a wrong user/pass from my index page, I get sent to a default postgresql pg_connect warning page. Perhaps I can increase the verbosity of postgresql's logger, find the phrase that it spits out when there's been a bad login and create a filter using that.
I understand that the way it is currently setup, my server is pretty secure, but where there's a will there's a way. I just feel that my postgresql database is unprotected even tho the postgresql port is not exposed to the WAN. They could just bruteforce from the apache server.
I am using a linux fedora 12.0 with L7 filter and proxy as the main firewall for my system composed of some several hundred pcs. The port 80 is open for certain mac addresses these computers, that is to say that , only a few of these computers have access to internet and others have been denied. However, they have access to two specific websites on internet .
I would like to know that if there is a virus attack through these websites in form of executable adwares or malwares, can this linux firewall detect any information that might be directed out of those computers to the attacking source? In other words, is there s tuning in L7 filter or any other filter that can detect transfer of files or some bites through port 80 unrelated to normal http requests?
I was looking for some help getting a good list of IP tables and other security measures on my new Linux Centos VPS.. I have some files I wan't no one other than myself to have access to.. I will be running some gameservers on it on ports 7777 and 7778 though and I want to have VSFTPD running for fast file transfers.
View 1 Replies View RelatedThere are multiple servers to be backed up. Different access rights exist in each server. There are two backup servers with plenty of disk space, one local, and one offsite. The local one feeds to the offsite one. The rsync command is being used to make a replica of backed up data. Deleted data is also being archived. There are two methods that have been considered: One is to have the individual servers run rsync which logs in to the backup server to push data. Two is to have the backup server run rsync which logs in to each individual server to pull data. Because system data is involved and meta information (like owning user) must be stored, root is required to access the data as well as to store it. That means everything runs as root both ends. So method one was quickly dismissed because each server would effectively have rights to access ALL the data on the backup server since it logs into the backup server as root. The security containment here involves different groups using different servers, and they need to be isolated from each other.
But even method two involves some risks that are a concern. This means one machine has access rights to every server. If the backup server were compromised, every machine could be compromised.What I'd like to find is some way to allow backups to be run without either machine granting root access to the other, while still running as root, or something equivalent, that allows accessing all data and storing all metadata. So I was looking at setting up an rsync daemon on each individual server (running as root so it can access what it is specified to access), and running an rsync client on the backup server (as root so it can store metadata). This opens network access issues. Any user on the network can connect to the rsync daemon. So password protection is needed. But this communication is also not encrypted, which exposes the password and the data should the network be sniffed.
So now I'm thinking about a non-root ssh login between machines. The backup server would login to a non-privileged user on each individual server and set up a secure forwarding channel to the rsync daemon. Is this the best that can be done? Is there a way to run rsync via SSL with key verification so it can all be done together? I'd like to have the rsync daemons configured to always talk SSL, and always verify the client's key against a list of authorized keys, and likewise the client verify the server's key against the known public key for that server.
I'm currently using Slackware 13.0 and have my machine behind a Linksys DD-WRT router. I believe the DD-WRT software has all ports blocked by default so opening up my machine for SSH login would only leave my system vulnerable at that port. To give an extra layer of security for that opened port, I've created the following script that would be invoked as the users' shell.
#!/bin/sh
#if SSH_CLIENT defined run nail with $SSH_CLIENT as an argument
if [[ -n ${SSH_CLIENT} ]]; then
[code]....
I have a mail server that accepts to relay from system in the trusted network. One of the systems in the trusted network is a webserver. On the webserver there are several scripts that send email.Let's focus on the PHP scripts. These use the mail() function for that.I am looking for means to reduce the potential abuse of the mail server when one of the PHP scripts is hacked.For the situation that the code is modified by a hacker or a new script is installed I would like to take this approach:
1) scan the system for scripts using the mail() function
2) generate a checksum list from these scripts
3) intercept email (being sent to sendmail) from these scripts
4) check if they match the checksum list
In theory (I will still have to implement it) this would take care of the situation in which new/modified scripts try to send email.
However, there is also the option of an exploit of some script. Are there any ideas on means to prevent email abuse for this situation (other that: make sure scripts cannot be exploited )?
iam working on mail server in redhat centos. i want to know how to secure my mail server for heavy loading , any monitoring tools in GUI or console , is any essential tool which is used in Like MNC for mail server..
i know few command in like top,netstat,etc through google but i willing to know some more
I'm running an SFPT server which my clients logon to using an FTP client. at the moment each client has a user name and password.
Thus far to improve security I've disabled root login but an looking for futrhrt ways to protect it from attack, having researched using google some of the security features suggested prevent the FPT clients from connecting.
Questions:
1- what further things can i do to secure my server that still allows it to be usable for FTP clients?
2- specifically is it possible to use non login pre-share key authentication?
How i set up the server is shown here: [url]
That's the title of article at[URL]Did ubuntu do all this already or is it that ubuntu isn't secure out of the box that it is assumed to be?explain if these steps are applicable to ubuntu and why/why not.
View 5 Replies View RelatedWe want to set up a Linux server (hosting Git or later SVN repositories) which should have all stored data strongly encrypted, so that if one steals the server the data cannot be read. For example, our notebooks have all important data stored on a "true-crypted" partition.
We plan to access it with SSH private keys and only after successful login should the data be readable. The server would be located in our office, shut down at night and not be connected to the Internet directly, but only accessible in our intranet.
I had some help via email from someone drafting my CV into the correct table format with open office. It's a .pdf file but now unfortunately lists the author in the document tab of properties as that person.
Is there anyway to change it to my own name, and also how do I 'secure' the document so that it's not easy for people viewing it to copy and paste, I've heard this is why many people now use .pdf for their CVs/rsums?
Quote:
ISC joined other key participants of the internet technical community in celebrating the achievement of a significant milestone for the Domain Name System today as the root zone was digitally signed for the first time. This marked the deployment of the DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC) at the top level of the DNS hierarchy and ushers the way forward for further roll-out of DNSSEC in the top level domains and DNS Service Providers.
love security/pentest tools. This script adds ALL the tools from the Security Spin, plus Metasploit. Feel free to modify it if need be.
View 12 Replies View Relatedthis is the allert i got:Code:Summary:Your system may be seriously compromised! /usr/sbin/NetworkManager tried to loada kernel module.Detailed Description:SELinux has prevented NetworkManager from loading a kernel module. All confinedprograms that need to load kernel modules should have already had policy writtenfor them. If a compromised application tries to modify the kernel this AVC willbe generated. This is a serious issue.Your system may very well be compromised.Allowing Access:Contact your security administrator and report this issue.Additional Information:
Source Context system_u:system_r:NetworkManager_t:s0
Target Context system_u:system_r:NetworkManager_t:s0
Target Objects None [ capability ]
[code]....
I'm just curious as to what security measure's I should be taking to make my box a little less vulnerable? I'm still experimenting/playing with Linux, use the net, IM, download this and that and was wondering how secure fedora 10 was out of the box?
View 12 Replies View RelatedDuring a recent install I made the leap to encryption,but /boot must remain unencrypted.Is there really any legitimate security risk to having an unencrypted /boot partition? I mean basically someone can just see what kernel you're running which they could see during boot anyways right? Oh I and keep all my financial documents in /boot/finances/ (haha ok not really, but I am serious about the first part).
View 5 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to install security lab menu on a normal Fedora 13 installation? I don't want to use security spin.
View 14 Replies View RelatedIf I leave the computer running for a few minutes without doing anything on it, this screen appears demanding that I enter my password, otherwise I can't get back to Fedora. I understand the necessity for this security feature in a work environment, but I'm just a home user and this security screen is just a nagging problem I don't know how to get rid of.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI just putup the fedora15 on my PC. there are several msg coming up from selinux saying permission denied, though I am not doing any administrative activity. the PC being a workstation for reaserch. how can I know the denial is for an security intrusion attempt. how can I set conditions to see the logs of all security intrusions. how can I set exclusive msg-ing from selinux that the denial is for a security intrusion attempt.
View 5 Replies View RelatedFirefox 3.5 has a critical java script vulnerability as noted in the recent news. I had to manually update to 3.5.1 using the mozilla tarball because there's still no Firefox 3.5.1 in Fedora Updates or even Fedora Updates Testing repositories. Is this normal? I didn't want to resort to using the mozilla one because now I can't use flash (my system is 64 bit and mozilla only seems to offer a 32bit tar file of Firefox) and having two Firefoxs means dealing with the ProfileManager, separate bookmarks and so on.
I'm trying to find out if I'm just looking in the wrong place, I tried the normal mirrors for "updates" for Fedora 11 and then updates-testing and also the baseurl for "updates" to get rid of the mirror update delay. None of them seem to have 3.5.1 ?
Problem that may require several tools available on Fedora. I don't know if its possible or not.
Given: Surveillance video box based on Fedora & Zoneminder. Internet connection is via a private 10.x.x.x network connection to the local phone company/ISP. That's the only connection available and they are the only ISP in the area. The ISP uses NAT to ultimately provide a routeable IP address, but that only works on outbound initiated traffic.
Problem: How can someone out on the Internet hit this box? i.e Is there any way to rig a method that will ultimately allow a connection initiated from the Internet to see the surveillance video that this box has stored via an http session?
I thought of one idea but don't have the tools to implement it. User sends an email to a server out on the Net somewhere. Surveillance box retrieves mail ever minute. The mail contains the users IP address. Surveillance box sends an outbound packet to that IP address to get NAT functional. The users box then uses that address to hit the box on the private network. The snag with this is that NAT is specific to ports, and I have no sway over the ISP's NAT capability.
Is there any way to push an http session outbound to the waiting end user? i.e. initiate a push of http traffic from the private box to the end user?
Does any one knows how to set an schedule for fire fox to terminate loading some IP. or restricting people to accessing some websites from your system..?I mean to set some restriction option to Fire Fox for third party..
View 4 Replies View RelatedI would like to maximise security on an FC 10 box. I had come across some scripts that perform a host of security tests and let me know recommendations on what all needs to be done. Dont seem to remember what they were called. Has any one tried any such stuff on FC10 recently? which scripts or suites you would recommend for this purpose...
View 2 Replies View RelatedI was reading that Arch does not provide security updates, but just provides security by keeping with up-to-date software...So what is in a security update and what does it patch? The kernel?
View 10 Replies View Related